Hays contracts not IR35 friendly, right hassle to get them to alter it. They do pay weekly though.
qh
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Which agency?
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Which agency?"
Collapse
-
I had a similar position last year. I had negotiated a rate inclusive of margin. Ended up with Hays who charged 5% (which was the Framework cost). They were pretty good to deal with. I understand some aren't happy with Hays contracts and perhaps they can comment.
Leave a comment:
-
Wasn't a 'hot lunch' was itOriginally posted by DirtyDog View PostRang Parity and the agent was out. She rang me back within 5 minutes, we chatted, she explained their margin. Negotiated on that a bit, and I ended up working through them for another 18 months. She took me to lunch the first week as well, to check that I was settling in OK.
Leave a comment:
-
I should add to my post that Parity modified the contract slightly based on a Qdos review - it was about reciprocal notice periods which at the time Qdos were suggesting they should be reciprocal.Originally posted by b0redom View PostThanks for that. Were they both amenable to contract review changes from QDOS/B&C?
Leave a comment:
-
I had the same kind of list a few years back.
Crossed out all the male name of the agents first, obviously.
Rang B&C and got such a rude response that I gave up on them - client had asked me to apply, and re-opened the role specially for me. Rang B&C and was told "we haven't got the role yet, we may have farmed it out to a third party if it was a low payer" - client rate was £600 a day.
Rang Parity and the agent was out. She rang me back within 5 minutes, we chatted, she explained their margin. Negotiated on that a bit, and I ended up working through them for another 18 months. She took me to lunch the first week as well, to check that I was settling in OK.
Hopefully, they have improved their systems a bit - the timesheet was on paper, in triplicate that I had to send over to them by post every month. They paid quickly though, and were nice enough to deal with.
Leave a comment:
-
OK, who are you, and what have you done with the real NLUK? I expected at least an 'Are you sure you're cut out for this?' comment.Originally posted by northernladuk View PostPick the one that is going to take the least commission and possibly give you a kick back for you landing your business on their doorstep IMO. Also maybe see which one you can push weekly billing/pay schedule rather than a month.
Hays had a problem with their contracts being particularly IR35 unfriendly. The search below returns quite a few threads on this topic. It could have changed now though.
https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=ha...ntractoruk.com
I also worked through Sping and from what I remember they did everything they should have without a problem.
Couple of names on there I don't recognise so I would personally try the big names first. Saying that there is the argument a smaller set up might look after you better.
HTH
Leave a comment:
-
Thanks for that. Were they both amenable to contract review changes from QDOS/B&C?
Leave a comment:
-
Pick the one that is going to take the least commission and possibly give you a kick back for you landing your business on their doorstep IMO. Also maybe see which one you can push weekly billing/pay schedule rather than a month.
Hays had a problem with their contracts being particularly IR35 unfriendly. The search below returns quite a few threads on this topic. It could have changed now though.
https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=ha...ntractoruk.com
I also worked through Sping and from what I remember they did everything they should have without a problem.
Couple of names on there I don't recognise so I would personally try the big names first. Saying that there is the argument a smaller set up might look after you better.
HTH
Leave a comment:
-
I have contracted through Spring and they were reliable weekly payers.
Capita I have used to source contractors, they charged me £35/day for any contractor we sent their way regardless of the source. That way we got non-PSL agency resources in.
Leave a comment:
-
Which agency?
Hi,
I've been approached by an end client out of the blue (I've previously worked with them before). I've been told I can pick my own agency from the following list, but I have to pick one.
Anyone have any views on the IR35ness of the contract and/or their flexibility?
- CERTES COMPUTING LTD
- L.A. INTERNATIONAL COMPUTER CONSULTANTS LTD
- MAGNETIC IT LTD
- PARITY GROUP PLC
- BADENOCH AND CLARK LTD
- CAPITA RESOURCING LTD
- HAYS SPECIALIST RECRUITMENT LTD
- NETWORKERS INTERNATIONAL (UK) LTD
- SPRING TECHNOLOGY STAFFING SERVICES LTD
Cheers....
b0redomTags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers

Leave a comment: