• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Client making me a director"

Collapse

  • Andy Hallett
    replied
    Are you going to be a (a) Company Director eg named at Companies House, or (b) a Director in title / level?

    If A, make sure you take some proper advice around conflict of interest / liabilities etc.

    If B, no problems

    For both A&B I believe you will be caught by IR35.

    Leave a comment:


  • quackhandle
    replied
    Cheers Mal, thanks for clarifying that.

    qh

    Leave a comment:


  • malvolio
    replied
    It is a long-standing requirement that a person holding a director's position in another company must receive any remuneration for that position net of PAYE and NICs. Who pays them is irrelevant, be it the client via their payroll or YourCO, but they must be paid. The Controlling Persons garbage is about closing off an anomaly for , ermm, controlling persons* who aren't necssarily directors. IR35 isn't a consideration, it's standard payroll, pure and simple.


    * "Controlling persons" are those holding an enduring post in an organisation such as CEO, Head of HR or whatever wher the post is an inherent part ofhe structure of the company no matter who sits behind the desk.

    Leave a comment:


  • quackhandle
    replied
    okay, so expecting a few face palms but the "office holder/controlling persons" only applies to positions in your client's company?

    Mentioned this to a fellow contractor in the office and he thought the same, ie it was our own ltd.

    Makes sense when you realise what Ed Lester was up to.

    Sorry, carry on.

    qh

    Leave a comment:


  • Goatfell
    replied
    Originally posted by SarahL2012 View Post
    I know 2 people who currently do interim director roles & consider them outside IR35. Depends on your interpretation of office holder - the company doesn't HAVE to have a finance director, COO etc, but it does HAVE to have a company secretary so only Co Sec is an office holder (that's their opinion BTW, not mine).

    But this doesn't sound like an interim role.....
    Not for limited companies now, unless there are different rules for PLCs etc?

    Leave a comment:


  • SarahL2012
    replied
    Originally posted by Mehmeh View Post
    Hey guys,

    Been contracting with my client for a while...They have now offered me a role as a director there.

    But I will continue to bill through my own LTD (at least for now, until other stuff is sorted and I get dividends etc from them).

    Is it cut and dry inside IR35?
    I know 2 people who currently do interim director roles & consider them outside IR35. Depends on your interpretation of office holder - the company doesn't HAVE to have a finance director, COO etc, but it does HAVE to have a company secretary so only Co Sec is an office holder (that's their opinion BTW, not mine).

    But this doesn't sound like an interim role.....

    Leave a comment:


  • northernladuk
    replied
    Well the controlling persons seems pretty cut and dried. As a director it would be assumed you have the power to direct the company so falls straight in to that.

    There is also the issues that a directors role can't really be put down to a set of deliverables and the fact that you are moving within the client showing D&C and permiesq traits of promotion.

    To be honest though, if you are working at that level in the company surely you have the nouse to negotiate yourself a better deal. I can't imagine the are offering you more money to do this so why not put a 6 figure salary+benefits on the table and go perm? A contractor in a directors position surely should be looking at billing £800+ a day which I am betting you are not. I would stick my neck out and say anyone capable of being a director would not be asking questions like this. You have to drive a company stragegy forward so if you can't work out a simple contractor situation I would wonder what is going on.

    Don't want to be rude to your client but appointing a contractor as a director also appears to be a pretty daft thing to do.

    Something doesn't sound right here but yes I would say you are pretty screwed IR35wise.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mehmeh
    replied
    Yes, when I was reading the "office holders" / controlled persons thing I thought exactly the same...

    But I'm not too sure?

    Leave a comment:


  • MyUserName
    replied
    Isn't this covered by the new change for 'controlling persons' or something?

    Leave a comment:


  • Mehmeh
    started a topic Client making me a director

    Client making me a director

    Hey guys,

    Been contracting with my client for a while...They have now offered me a role as a director there.

    But I will continue to bill through my own LTD (at least for now, until other stuff is sorted and I get dividends etc from them).

    Is it cut and dry inside IR35?

Working...
X