• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Any reason not to take a permie job at current client?"

Collapse

  • Notascooby
    replied
    It's like looking for the can opener - asked for link to thread, then immediately found it

    *edited for stupidity*

    Leave a comment:


  • Bronco Billy
    replied
    Originally posted by eek View Post
    I don't think kingcook is clear enough here. If the permie job is the same as your previous contract role then you would be very hard pushed to pretend that you weren't under IR35 for the entirety of that contract period.

    So work out how much tax you saved by pretending you weren't under IR35 and start saving

    This is not an issue if you are were working under an umbrella otherwise think very carefully.
    Not sure I see why the whole of the previous contract would be inside IR35, if there was a genuine lack of MOO.

    If the client had been aware of a better (cheaper ?) resource, would it have carried on extending the OP's contract ?

    Likewise, if the OP had come across a better contract opportunity then would he have carried on extending in his current role ? (Or would he have not even bothered looking for work on the run-up to contract expiry date, on the assumption he would keep getting extended ?)

    Leave a comment:


  • BolshieBastard
    replied
    Originally posted by bobspud View Post
    Doesn't matter about what the contract says, it's the end client breaking it, and they will either pay the agent or warn them to wind their neck in. So do your maths and decide what you want to do.
    WBSS.

    The client should take all \ any flak over this not the contractor. If the OP does decide to take up the offer, he must make it clear to the client that it is wholly their responsibility to square this with the agency and in no way, should he, the contractor or his ltd, get drawn into discussions about fees or handcuffs etc.

    My last client asked me to go permie but I politely declined as I've done my (22 year) stint.

    Leave a comment:


  • eek
    replied
    Originally posted by quackhandle View Post


    qh
    I don't think kingcook is clear enough here. If the permie job is the same as your previous contract role then you would be very hard pushed to pretend that you weren't under IR35 for the entirety of that contract period.

    So work out how much tax you saved by pretending you weren't under IR35 and start saving

    This is not an issue if you are were working under an umbrella otherwise think very carefully.

    Leave a comment:


  • quackhandle
    replied
    Originally posted by kingcook View Post
    Yes, it's very bad - you'll be paying tax


    qh

    Leave a comment:


  • kingcook
    replied
    Originally posted by neilh111 View Post
    Sorry this has probably been done to death, but I got offered what sounds like will be a senior and reasonably lucrative permie job at my current client, and I'm considering whether to take it or not.

    Are there any reasons why this would be a bad idea from a tax / IR35 perspective?
    Yes, it's very bad - you'll be paying tax

    Leave a comment:


  • ELBBUBKUNPS
    replied
    If the permie role offer is doing the same thing you contracted for Im pretty sure you might have to accept your time as a contractor there actually failed IR35. If it were me and permy role was same as contract I wouldnt accept it..

    Leave a comment:


  • bobspud
    replied
    Doesn't matter about what the contract says, it's the end client breaking it, and they will either pay the agent or warn them to wind their neck in. So do your maths and decide what you want to do.

    Leave a comment:


  • Wanderer
    replied
    Originally posted by oracleslave View Post
    I'd be amazed if the agent doesn't have additional clauses in the contract, either in the contract with your limited company and in the upper contract with the client specifying a "finders fee" of some sort should you enter into a business relationship with the client in any form that removes their income stream.
    They will do, but it's in their contract with the client not the contractor.

    Leave a comment:


  • northernladuk
    replied
    Did you opt in or out at time of taking the contract and what does your contract say.

    Is the new role doing something connected to what you are doing now?

    Leave a comment:


  • oracleslave
    replied
    I'd be amazed if the agent doesn't have additional clauses in the contract, either in the contract with your limited company and in the upper contract with the client specifying a "finders fee" of some sort should you enter into a business relationship with the client in any form that removes their income stream.

    Leave a comment:


  • Any reason not to take a permie job at current client?

    Sorry this has probably been done to death, but I got offered what sounds like will be a senior and reasonably lucrative permie job at my current client, and I'm considering whether to take it or not.

    Are there any reasons why this would be a bad idea from a tax / IR35 perspective?

    Also I have reviewed my agent's contract for restrictions - there is one saying "the consultancy" can't provide services to the client via other organisations for a period of 6 months. I take "the consultancy" to mean the Ltd company, which would not be providing services if I was entering into a contract of employment, and thus my reading is that there is no issue.

    Has anyone seen a clause like this, gone permie, and had any problems as a result?

    Thanks in advance for any advice.
Working...
X