Originally posted by Eirikur
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "End client asks me to do a IR35 determination"
Collapse
-
By Government Portal do you mean CEST, something that even HMRC ignore when it comes to going to court?
-
Two threads currently running discussion getting your own IR35 review even though it's the clients risk. Some say get one anyway, others say don't bother
https://forums.contractoruk.com/acco...e-by-qdos.html
https://forums.contractoruk.com/busi...uses-ir35.html
Leave a comment:
-
See it as an opportunity to embrace further the things that can make it outside. Client should support.
Leave a comment:
-
If it's borderline, then you should probably avoid it, doubly so if there are claw-back clauses in the contract. But, even if there aren't, it isn't completely risk free. Better to stick with contracts that are very clearly outside and that do not have any claw-back clauses. As to whether it's common, it certainly isn't unheard of that a client will ask you to foot the cost of a review, and I personally wouldn't accept that either (not because of the cost, per se, but because you're being asked to participate on their behalf, which is a dubious blurring of responsibilities and potentially increases risk too - different than making an assessment independently for your own due diligence).
Leave a comment:
-
End client asks me to do a IR35 determination
Got offer on the table, outside of IR35 (they say) showed me a QDOS assessment which confirms it is. However in my opinion it's borderline and they haven't done a full assessment on the Government portal, where there are many more questions and options to answer then in the QDOS assessment.
Now they ask me to do an assessment with QDOS as well, is this normal in the new IR35 world?Tags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Should a new limited company not making much money pay a salary/dividend? Feb 13 08:43
- Blocking the 2025 Loan Charge settlement opportunity from being a genuine opportunity is… HMRC Feb 12 07:41
- How a buyer’s market in UK property for 2026 is contractors’ double-edge sword Feb 11 07:12
- Why PAYE overcharging by HMRC is every contractor’s problem Feb 10 06:26
- Government unveils ‘Umbrella Company Regulations consultation’ Feb 9 05:55
- JSL rules ‘are HMRC’s way to make contractor umbrella company clients give a sh*t where their money goes’ Feb 8 07:42
- Contractors warned over HMRC charging £3.5 billion too much Feb 6 03:18
- Statutory Sick Pay (SSP) for umbrella company contractors: an April 2026 explainer Feb 5 07:19
- IR35: IT contractors ‘most concerned about off-payroll working rules’ Feb 4 07:11
- Labour’s near-silence on its employment status shakeup is telling, and disappointing Feb 3 07:47

Leave a comment: