Originally posted by jamesbrown
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Transferring Contract to Inside IR35
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Transferring Contract to Inside IR35"
Collapse
-
Last edited by mogga71; 5 May 2021, 13:01.
-
Originally posted by RobScott View Post
You don't have scare people, while most of them do this.
Nothing wrong with pointing out the situation to people. If they are clueless to what they do then making them aware of the possible outcomes isn't a bad thing. Nothing untrue in the what he said and I've no doubt it will start to happen so it's a lottery but still knowing what you are letting yourself in for is good advice. Up to whoever it is reading to go away and looking to the levels or risk and making a decision themselves.
You could argue it's the same people that don't know this that kinda caught the attention of HMRC so getting people to pull their finger out their asses in general isn't a bad thing either.
To sit there and say screw it just carry on is the wrong way. IMO anyway.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by yorkshirespud View Post
C. Neither - you ideally need to leave or put yourself in danger of retroactive action from HMRC (regardless of what they say).
If this month you are "outside", and then next month "inside" for exactly the same role, then your "outside-ness" of all the time you have so far already spent working for the client becomes hard to defend.
Even if your next role at a different client is inside IR35, that would be a better position to be in - you worked for the current client outside, you work for the next client inside - the two roles are different clients and not connected.
A lot of people will no doubt be going down this same road - better to get on the merry go round of contractors changing roles, even if they are inside.
You don't want to be at the same role next month with a switch from outside to inside.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by CountryGirl View PostHi Guys,
Thanks a lot for your input.
There were quite a few aspects here involved in the switch that I haven't been aware of (part of my wishful thinking I guess).
Much appreciate your help.
You've got a week to leave so better buck up.
Leave a comment:
-
Hi Guys,
Thanks a lot for your input.
There were quite a few aspects here involved in the switch that I haven't been aware of (part of my wishful thinking I guess).
Much appreciate your help.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by michaelC View Post
then he does MVL. is that an issue? - apart from having to wait 2 yrs before going outside ir35 again.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by northernladuk View PostAnd if they have too much in so have to MVL?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by michaelC View PostJust accept the inside contract whatever max rate they give, and quickly close the LTD company down - takes only 6 months.
Leave a comment:
-
Just accept the inside contract whatever max rate they give, and quickly close the LTD company down - takes only 6 months.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Lance View Post
we should celebrate every MVL query with a or 3. Thinning out the numbers
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Lance View Post
we should celebrate every MVL query with a or 3. Thinning out the numbers
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Streamline Your Retirement with iSIPP: A Solution for Contractor Pensions Sep 1 09:13
- Making the most of pension lump sums: overview for contractors Sep 1 08:36
- Umbrella company tribunal cases are opening up; are your wages subject to unlawful deductions, too? Aug 31 08:38
- Contractors, relabelling 'labour' as 'services' to appear 'fully contracted out' won't dupe IR35 inspectors Aug 31 08:30
- How often does HMRC check tax returns? Aug 30 08:27
- Work-life balance as an IT contractor: 5 top tips from a tech recruiter Aug 30 08:20
- Autumn Statement 2023 tipped to prioritise mental health, in a boost for UK workplaces Aug 29 08:33
- Final reminder for contractors to respond to the umbrella consultation (closing today) Aug 29 08:09
- Top 5 most in demand cyber security contract roles Aug 25 08:38
- Changes to the right to request flexible working are incoming, but how will contractors be affected? Aug 24 08:25
Leave a comment: