thank you all for your recommendations. I do agree that I don't want to work without a written contract. I will be polite and respectful but firm. I'll tell them I'll be happy to take a break between the end of this contract and the start of the new one should they need some time to get the new contract signed. I do understand there is a risk that they might choose to replace me, but:
1) I take the risk (I have started looking elsewhere)
2) I don't want to work without a contract because it puts in a very weak and uncomfortable position
3) if i accept to work without a contract, they will probably jump to the conclusion that I am desperate, can't go anywhere... and they will probably think they can bully me as they wish
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "continue working on a fixed term contract without a signed extension"
Collapse
-
continue working on a fixed term contract without a signed extension
Originally posted by malvolio View PostDidn't realise it was a competition. DGAS if it is, it won't alter my argument
However, which has the stronger bargaining position: an employee you want to keep or an unemployed new job applicant needing a whole new FTC?
The correct answer is for the OP to get an extension to his existing FTC, but that does require some work from the employer. And the option of continuing to work still stands except that the existing FTC won't still be in effect, so it is not clear on what basis the OP will be working, which is why it's a bad idea to walk out and try to come back. It needs resolving before the FTC expires.
In case no one has said this you should start looking for another role, if you get and don't want it then you have more leverage in your negotiationsLast edited by VillageContractor; 20 February 2018, 11:44.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by northernladuk View PostKeep going.. You've got him on the back foot. I think you can win this one.
However, which has the stronger bargaining position: an employee you want to keep or an unemployed new job applicant needing a whole new FTC?
The correct answer is for the OP to get an extension to his existing FTC, but that does require some work from the employer. And the option of continuing to work still stands except that the existing FTC won't still be in effect, so it is not clear on what basis the OP will be working, which is why it's a bad idea to walk out and try to come back. It needs resolving before the FTC expires.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by VillageContractor View PostOf course you have bargaining power. If they need you then you have some power - maybe not a lot though, only OP will know
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by malvolio View PostAgreed, but I was trying to clarify the position in response to those who seem to have no proper understanding of FTCs and are advocating the conventional withdrawal of labour approach.
And if you don't renew an FTC, you're no longer employed so don't have a lot of bargaining power...
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by VillageContractor View PostBut if he's at the end of his FTC then he's not bound by any of the rules, unless they extend. But I agree play hard ball otherwise you're left open to risk
And if you don't renew an FTC, you're no longer employed so don't have a lot of bargaining power...
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by malvolio View PostIt's an FTC. That's a conventional permie employment contract with a set end date and restrictions on access to things like pension rights and redundancy payments (i.e. there aren't any) You cannot treat it like a freelance contract.
So, for example, you can't simply decide to take time off, you have a limited holiday allocation and beyond that you don't get paid. Stretch that too far and you are dismissed for gross misconduct. And so on.
Also, it's a while since I looked but various employment rights accrue after two years anyway. Meaning the OP will probably need a whole new contract. It may look exactly the same as the current one.
Finally, if he continues working without a new contract, normally the terms of the old one will still apply by default. However, one of those terms is that the employment stops at a set date.
I don't know the answer but I suspect playing hardball with the OP's employer is a necessary step.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Hobosapien View PostNot sure how fixed term differentiates from 'normal' but under normal circumstances I'd be letting the client know that I'd be taking time off at the end of the current contract until the new contract/extension is in place.
If client is bothered about that it's up to them to get their paperwork sorted in time.
The risk with working without a contract in place is that even though those you work with want to keep you on, until it's in writing then higher management may have other ideas.
So, for example, you can't simply decide to take time off, you have a limited holiday allocation and beyond that you don't get paid. Stretch that too far and you are dismissed for gross misconduct. And so on.
Also, it's a while since I looked but various employment rights accrue after two years anyway. Meaning the OP will probably need a whole new contract. It may look exactly the same as the current one.
Finally, if he continues working without a new contract, normally the terms of the old one will still apply by default. However, one of those terms is that the employment stops at a set date.
I don't know the answer but I suspect playing hardball with the OP's employer is a necessary step.
Leave a comment:
-
Not sure how fixed term differentiates from 'normal' but under normal circumstances I'd be letting the client know that I'd be taking time off at the end of the current contract until the new contract/extension is in place.
If client is bothered about that it's up to them to get their paperwork sorted in time.
The risk with working without a contract in place is that even though those you work with want to keep you on, until it's in writing then higher management may have other ideas.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by calder View PostMy employer wants to extend me for a further 6 months but they told me it will take another few weeks before they can send me the extension contract.
Leave a comment:
-
-
Originally posted by ladymuck View PostNever a good idea to work without a contract. You are at real risk of not being paid.
There are also insurance considerations - some clients are in breach of their liability insurances if someone is working on site without a contract in place to be there. Double check with your contact whether they have considered this.
Similarly, some clients have IT systems that kick in to disable building and system access when a fixed term contract expires - will you still be able to deliver?
You could get a letter of intent from the client, confirming that they will pay any invoices raised during the gap. However, if that's something the manager knocks up without their legal team's consent, you have to wonder if it's enforceable and, if it is, why they can't knock up a full on contract instead.
I've not seen any evidence either way but I wonder if working outside of a contract is a MOO indicator? My gut says that it is a different matter entirely but it popped into my head as something else to check out.
It’s an employment contract with a definite end date though. So I would be wary about working without something written down. Best to discuss with the manager. If you’ve been there 2 years you have a good relationship with them.
Leave a comment:
-
Never a good idea to work without a contract. You are at real risk of not being paid.
There are also insurance considerations - some clients are in breach of their liability insurances if someone is working on site without a contract in place to be there. Double check with your contact whether they have considered this.
Similarly, some clients have IT systems that kick in to disable building and system access when a fixed term contract expires - will you still be able to deliver?
You could get a letter of intent from the client, confirming that they will pay any invoices raised during the gap. However, if that's something the manager knocks up without their legal team's consent, you have to wonder if it's enforceable and, if it is, why they can't knock up a full on contract instead.
I've not seen any evidence either way but I wonder if working outside of a contract is a MOO indicator? My gut says that it is a different matter entirely but it popped into my head as something else to check out.
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Streamline Your Retirement with iSIPP: A Solution for Contractor Pensions Sep 1 09:13
- Making the most of pension lump sums: overview for contractors Sep 1 08:36
- Umbrella company tribunal cases are opening up; are your wages subject to unlawful deductions, too? Aug 31 08:38
- Contractors, relabelling 'labour' as 'services' to appear 'fully contracted out' won't dupe IR35 inspectors Aug 31 08:30
- How often does HMRC check tax returns? Aug 30 08:27
- Work-life balance as an IT contractor: 5 top tips from a tech recruiter Aug 30 08:20
- Autumn Statement 2023 tipped to prioritise mental health, in a boost for UK workplaces Aug 29 08:33
- Final reminder for contractors to respond to the umbrella consultation (closing today) Aug 29 08:09
- Top 5 most in demand cyber security contract roles Aug 25 08:38
- Changes to the right to request flexible working are incoming, but how will contractors be affected? Aug 24 08:25
Leave a comment: