• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "SDC Worries Re. Travel and Subsistence"

Collapse

  • northernladuk
    replied
    Originally posted by The Only Way Is Keynsham View Post
    Not wanting to throw in a curveball but, if that is the case, wtf would you bother going through a brolly?
    Can't be a director, too newbie to want to jump straight in to LTDs, already on an inside IR35 contract so dont need a LTD, a whole host of personal reasons etc. No one said they were ideal but can suit some people's needs

    Leave a comment:


  • eek
    replied
    Originally posted by The Only Way Is Keynsham View Post
    Not wanting to throw in a curveball but, if that is the case, wtf would you bother going through a brolly?
    One reason would be that you don't have many expenses.
    Another reason is that come next April in the public sector you may as well as it won't make any difference...

    Leave a comment:


  • The Only Way Is Keynsham
    replied
    Originally posted by northernladuk View Post
    Brollies already got their T&S stopped April just gone. TCP made that clear in the 2nd post on this thread.
    Not wanting to throw in a curveball but, if that is the case, wtf would you bother going through a brolly?
    Last edited by The Only Way Is Keynsham; 12 September 2016, 20:22.

    Leave a comment:


  • northernladuk
    replied
    Originally posted by The Only Way Is Keynsham View Post
    What if you go through a brolly ?
    Brollies already got their T&S stopped April just gone. TCP made that clear in the 2nd post on this thread.

    Leave a comment:


  • The Only Way Is Keynsham
    replied
    Originally posted by jamesbrown View Post
    TCP is correct. When IR35 is the relevant legislation, it is also the relevant legislation for T&S, not SDC alone.
    What if you go through a brolly ?

    Leave a comment:


  • jamesbrown
    replied
    TCP is correct. When IR35 is the relevant legislation, it is also the relevant legislation for T&S, not SDC alone.

    Leave a comment:


  • LondonManc
    replied
    Originally posted by The Only Way Is Keynsham View Post
    I have been offered a contract that has been passed by QDOS as being outside of IR35.

    I know about working practices etc with respect to IR35 but the thing that worries me here is the Superviosion, Direction OR Control aspect of the new rules on claiming T&S.

    This is the scenario - I'll be working for a Japanese car manufacturer who impose the same working conditions on everybody across the board; i.e. Fixed working hours and break times.

    This time last year if I'd been offered it I'd have no qualms about accepting because there's some IR35 friendly stuff in there like having to work from home on my own kit when the factory shuts down over Christmas and summer.

    Now these new T&S rules are in place I'm tempted to turn this one down as fixed working hours to me demonstrates that I'm subject to control.

    I think I've answered my own question but I'd be interested to hear other views.

    Fixed working hours isn't a biggie if they're fixed for everyone, including other consultants, as that simply indicates the availability of the other people.

    Leave a comment:


  • The Only Way Is Keynsham
    replied
    Originally posted by northernladuk View Post
    Just for the OP, those normal rules would include the 24 month rule and expectation to be working in the same geographic area for a long period of time. Plenty of links on the right if you are new to the 24 month rule.
    I rarely stay anywhere longer than 6 months to be honest.

    I get bored easily & it reduces my exposure should the worst happen.

    Leave a comment:


  • The Only Way Is Keynsham
    replied
    Originally posted by TheCyclingProgrammer View Post
    IIRC the new rules for T&S (supervision, direction OR control) do not apply to PSCs, they apply to umbrella contractors. PSCs ability to claim T&S is still dictated by IR35 status. If you're confident that you are outside IR35 then you can claim T&S subject to the normal rules.
    Ah, didn't know that.

    That makes all the difference then.

    Thanks.

    Leave a comment:


  • northernladuk
    replied
    Originally posted by TheCyclingProgrammer View Post
    IIRC the new rules for T&S (supervision, direction OR control) do not apply to PSCs, they apply to umbrella contractors. PSCs ability to claim T&S is still dictated by IR35 status. If you're confident that you are outside IR35 then you can claim T&S subject to the normal rules.
    Just for the OP, those normal rules would include the 24 month rule and expectation to be working in the same geographic area for a long period of time. Plenty of links on the right if you are new to the 24 month rule.

    Leave a comment:


  • TheCyclingProgrammer
    replied
    IIRC the new rules for T&S (supervision, direction OR control) do not apply to PSCs, they apply to umbrella contractors. PSCs ability to claim T&S is still dictated by IR35 status. If you're confident that you are outside IR35 then you can claim T&S subject to the normal rules.

    Leave a comment:


  • The Only Way Is Keynsham
    started a topic SDC Worries Re. Travel and Subsistence

    SDC Worries Re. Travel and Subsistence

    I have been offered a contract that has been passed by QDOS as being outside of IR35.

    I know about working practices etc with respect to IR35 but the thing that worries me here is the Superviosion, Direction OR Control aspect of the new rules on claiming T&S.

    This is the scenario - I'll be working for a Japanese car manufacturer who impose the same working conditions on everybody across the board; i.e. Fixed working hours and break times.

    This time last year if I'd been offered it I'd have no qualms about accepting because there's some IR35 friendly stuff in there like having to work from home on my own kit when the factory shuts down over Christmas and summer.

    Now these new T&S rules are in place I'm tempted to turn this one down as fixed working hours to me demonstrates that I'm subject to control.

    I think I've answered my own question but I'd be interested to hear other views.
Working...
X