• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Allegis/Tek: Interesting Contract Term"

Collapse

  • eek
    replied
    Originally posted by malvolio View Post
    But does it reflect reality..?
    As no HR department would risk employing him on a permanent basis, yes....

    Leave a comment:


  • malvolio
    replied
    Originally posted by FatLazyContractor View Post
    I have the same contract from Allegis on my current gig. Been through QDOS and it passed with flying colours.
    But does it reflect reality..?

    Leave a comment:


  • FatLazyContractor
    replied
    Originally posted by northernladuk View Post
    That's nice. Just make sure you put it through QDOS and get a pass for contract and working practices. That would make me feel better.
    I have the same contract from Allegis on my current gig. Been through QDOS and it passed with flying colours.

    Leave a comment:


  • northernladuk
    replied
    Originally posted by Cirrus View Post
    I agree these are all sham clauses but my accountant always says "But the point is an employee contract would never ever have those words in - so you are not an employee".

    Well, it makes me feel better...
    That's nice. Just make sure you put it through QDOS and get a pass for contract and working practices. That would make me feel better.

    Leave a comment:


  • Cirrus
    replied
    Originally posted by northernladuk View Post
    You know many contracts are worded just to be IR35 friendly so I wouldn't get over excited when another sham clause appears that looks good.
    I agree these are all sham clauses but my accountant always says "But the point is an employee contract would never ever have those words in - so you are not an employee".

    Well, it makes me feel better...

    Leave a comment:


  • northernladuk
    replied
    What you should be is how often. Someone might have but in a vast majority they won't have. You know many contracts are worded just to be IR35 friendly so I wouldn't get over excited when another sham clause appears that looks good.

    Leave a comment:


  • Cirrus
    started a topic Allegis/Tek: Interesting Contract Term

    Allegis/Tek: Interesting Contract Term

    Just got an extension in the form of a new Schedule: Project Details.

    The wording includes

    The Company shall provide the following, non-exclusive resources in support of the Specified Services:
    • One or more Consultants will lead the project on behalf of the Company.
    • One or more Personal Computer systems ...
      etc


    I must ask my agent whether anyone has ever brought along other consultants under such a contract

Working...
X