• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "SC Clearance Question"

Collapse

  • LondonManc
    replied
    Originally posted by clearedforlanding View Post
    Whatever next? "I am on the sex offenders register*, should I prepare the local school prior to my background check for a gig setting up their IT lab"?

    *I am not.
    At least you'd be safer if you were* because you'd drive slower near the school.

    *You're not.

    Leave a comment:


  • clearedforlanding
    replied
    Whatever next? "I am on the sex offenders register*, should I prepare the local school prior to my background check for a gig setting up their IT lab"?

    *I am not.

    Leave a comment:


  • SueEllen
    replied
    Originally posted by SlipTheJab View Post
    With a rap sheet like that have you thought of joining the police?
    Since that case of the newspaper seller a policeman killed they have got more selective. So the harassment charge is a no no.

    Leave a comment:


  • LondonManc
    replied
    Originally posted by SlipTheJab View Post
    With a rap sheet like that have you thought of joining the police?
    Better chance of becoming an MP.

    Leave a comment:


  • SlipTheJab
    replied
    Originally posted by drap View Post
    Having read the Q&A pinned thread and through several other posts, i would like to ask what is the likelihood of me passing the SC clearance.

    The convictions were:

    Theft from an employer - i stole a laptop (1992)
    Fraud - My girlfriend stole some money from me, so i replaced it from her credit card (2005)
    Harassement - I sent her a bunch of flowers, to her work, to say thanks! (2005)

    A lot of the work that i'm involved in requires SC clearance now and several jobs that i have been put forward for are asking to put me through it. Should i tell them prior to being put forwarded or should i wait to be employed and apply?
    With a rap sheet like that have you thought of joining the police?

    Leave a comment:


  • clearedforlanding
    replied
    Originally posted by SueEllen View Post
    Not having a credit history is different from having a bad credit history.

    A young person who lives in their parents' home in the UK, has no credit cards, is not on the electoral roll and has just left full-time education has no credit history. Someone who has county court judgements against them, or has missed mobile phone payments, or missed credit card payments has a bad credit history.

    The first person can work in a bank if they have sufficient records to prove they are just out of education. If they are older they need to create one by getting on the electoral roll then signing up for a credit card and use it for small purchases paying it off in full and on time every month.

    With a bad credit history depending on the cause you either have to behaviour yourself for a year or 6 years.

    Since you have no credit history and are older then you should have created one especially as EU and some Commonwealth citizens are allowed on the electoral roll even if they can't vote in all elections.

    +1 I would add in the UK if your bank will not issue you a credit card (for example no proof of UK income) a SIM only mobile contract is the way to go. We will dish them out to anyone as in Y1 our exposure (your credit limit) is capped at c£100*, which is an acceptable risk of default/price for new client acquisition.

    *actually it works out as more at retail (and on your credit report), 'cause we calculate exposure at wholesale prices.
    Last edited by clearedforlanding; 17 February 2016, 09:52. Reason: clarification of butter (ghee)

    Leave a comment:


  • SueEllen
    replied
    Originally posted by gixxer View Post
    I somehow want to believe that the OP is a hoax, and likely it is. I got binned for a bank contract after having worked long years in the financial sector just because my credit history is not good...or better not exsitent as I have never been resident in the UK...goes without saying that I could provide clean records for all the countries where I lived.
    Not having a credit history is different from having a bad credit history.

    A young person who lives in their parents' home in the UK, has no credit cards, is not on the electoral roll and has just left full-time education has no credit history. Someone who has county court judgements against them, or has missed mobile phone payments, or missed credit card payments has a bad credit history.

    The first person can work in a bank if they have sufficient records to prove they are just out of education. If they are older they need to create one by getting on the electoral roll then signing up for a credit card and use it for small purchases paying it off in full and on time every month.

    With a bad credit history depending on the cause you either have to behaviour yourself for a year or 6 years.

    Since you have no credit history and are older then you should have created one especially as EU and some Commonwealth citizens are allowed on the electoral roll even if they can't vote in all elections.

    Leave a comment:


  • clearedforlanding
    replied
    Originally posted by northernladuk View Post
    You've not thought this through very well. Having a bad credit history and working with money are potentially the worst combination. So many news articles on people working with finances fiddling it because they can't pay the mortgage. Happens on a weekly basis.
    To put the OP in a similar situation to yours would be him having a conviction for selling company data.

    If you'd assaulted someone (outside of work) you wouldnt have been binned. It's about what makes you a risk to what you are doing.
    Having a bad credit history != Not having a credit history != Having a credit history overseas.

    1 & 3 amount to the same for most practical purposes. With freedom of movement & employment, I wish the EU had sorted out a common framework for sharing credit records.

    Leave a comment:


  • PurpleGorilla
    replied
    OP don't know if the SC check will pick you out.

    But I hope so.

    You don't deserve the privilege.

    Leave a comment:


  • northernladuk
    replied
    Originally posted by gixxer View Post
    I somehow want to believe that the OP is a hoax, and likely it is. I got binned for a bank contract after having worked long years in the financial sector just because my credit history is not good...or better not exsitent as I have never been resident in the UK...goes without saying that I could provide clean records for all the countries where I lived.
    You've not thought this through very well. Having a bad credit history and working with money are potentially the worst combination. So many news articles on people working with finances fiddling it because they can't pay the mortgage. Happens on a weekly basis.
    To put the OP in a similar situation to yours would be him having a conviction for selling company data.

    If you'd assaulted someone (outside of work) you wouldnt have been binned. It's about what makes you a risk to what you are doing.

    Leave a comment:


  • gixxer
    replied
    Originally posted by northernladuk View Post
    Oddly enough they don't really. That's the recruitment side to sort that out. SC is just looking in to whether you are trustworthy enough to get access to sensitive data. Beating the crap out of someone doesn't really change that but dishonesty, fraud and possibly money problems does.
    I somehow want to believe that the OP is a hoax, and likely it is. I got binned for a bank contract after having worked long years in the financial sector just because my credit history is not good...or better not exsitent as I have never been resident in the UK...goes without saying that I could provide clean records for all the countries where I lived.

    Leave a comment:


  • northernladuk
    replied
    Originally posted by FrontEnder View Post
    So you're a thief and a liar and have some sort of harassment charge on top of that. I wouldn't trust you with a regular job, let alone one that might require you to handle sensitive data or government secrets.

    I'm no expert in SC clearance though, so maybe they don't give a tulipe about this sort of stuff.
    Oddly enough they don't really. That's the recruitment side to sort that out. SC is just looking in to whether you are trustworthy enough to get access to sensitive data. Beating the crap out of someone doesn't really change that but dishonesty, fraud and possibly money problems does.

    Leave a comment:


  • FrontEnder
    replied
    So you're a thief and a liar and have some sort of harassment charge on top of that. I wouldn't trust you with a regular job, let alone one that might require you to handle sensitive data or government secrets.

    I'm no expert in SC clearance though, so maybe they don't give a tulipe about this sort of stuff.

    Leave a comment:


  • clearedforlanding
    replied
    The convictions are:

    Theft from an employer of a laptop (and possibly information theft). (1992)
    Fraud committed using or involving a payment card to obtain unauthorised funds from an account. (2005)
    Harassment of a previous partner at her workplace. (2005)

    Your reasons did not convince the court not to convict you and will not form part of an assessment of the risk you present. They are irrelevant.

    In black and white it doesn't look good to a prospective client.

    should i wait to be employed
    This is a contractor forum so employment is irrelevant. Mostly your SC will be performed before you are allowed on site.

    Leave a comment:


  • SueEllen
    replied
    How hard are you finding it to get jobs in other areas such as NHS, government and financial services? If you don't have problems getting roles in those areas then you should get security clearance.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X