Originally posted by tractor
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Training?
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Training?"
Collapse
-
Why would a client send you on a course for a skill that you have been contracted to provide? If you have lied about a skill they will bin you and find someone else not train you up.
-
....
If your client wants to send you on a course for something that you have been charging them for 6 years or more then you should be worried.Originally posted by TheLordDave View PostNo course I have ever done has ever added £100 a day to my rate. Although I'm just a Dev your milage may vary if your higher up the chain. Saying 'I have been on a .net course' adds nothing over 6 years using it.
What if the course was effectively free to you and covered required conversion to a completely new version?
Leave a comment:
-
No course I have ever done has ever added £100 a day to my rate. Although I'm just a Dev your milage may vary if your higher up the chain. Saying 'I have been on a .net course' adds nothing over 6 years using it.
Leave a comment:
-
Hmm. Interesting one. Depends on how much the good the course would do for me I guess.
If it was useless for me and just good for client then nope.
If it was a brill course that was expensive and would look for me, then maybe.
Also depends if client is paying for hotels etc as well. Wouldnt want to be even furhter out of pocket for sure.
One intangible also. So client gets to save a weeks billing, they get you on the course they want you to go on. Quite a bit of good will there given by contractor....
Leave a comment:
-
I think that wins the award for the most shortsighted ridiculous POTD. Maybe a course in trolling is required.Originally posted by TheLordDave View PostI was asked to do this my answer was 'if I'm not invoicing I'm at home' I have no interest in losing a day's pay to 'up skill' for my 'employer'.
Quite why anyone goes on training courses these days is beyond me.
Leave a comment:
-
To be able to charge an extra £100pd.Originally posted by TheLordDave View PostI was asked to do this my answer was 'if I'm not invoicing I'm at home' I have no interest in losing a day's pay to 'up skill' for my 'employer'.
Quite why anyone goes on training courses these days is beyond me.
HTH.
Leave a comment:
-
If you do Java and it's a python course, that's fine. If it's a bakery course then you aren't.Originally posted by MicrosoftBob View PostFor it to be an allowable expense doesn't it needs to be training in something you already know ???
Leave a comment:
-
For it to be an allowable expense doesn't it needs to be training in something you already know ???Originally posted by vwdan View PostFrom an IR35 perspective that's fine and from a training perspective its okay if its useful training, but other than that I'm filing it in pisstake territory.
Leave a comment:
-
I was asked to do this my answer was 'if I'm not invoicing I'm at home' I have no interest in losing a day's pay to 'up skill' for my 'employer'.
Quite why anyone goes on training courses these days is beyond me.
Leave a comment:
-
I'd be a little more worried about why you being asked to do this? Has then work you are contracted to do changed to the extent you need more knowledge or is it something new you are being asked to do? Is the manager treating you as part and parcel of the organization so lumping you in etc. All very bad pointers and I would say going on the course is the least of your concerns.
Leave a comment:
-
Don't know about that but I'm just asking from an IR35 perspective.
Leave a comment:
-
Dunno what the course is, but that sounds likely to be significantly more expensive - especially on flate rate VAT.Originally posted by zappakat View PostHow about the other way round?
Paying for the course through the business but the client arranging the course letting you claim your day rate...
Leave a comment:
-
How about the other way round?
Paying for the course through the business but the client arranging the course letting you claim your day rate...
Leave a comment:
-
I prob wouldn't have an issue with it if it was me as I'd come out the contract with qualifiable experience putting what I had learned on the course into practice. In my view would be something very valuable when the contract ends and looking for the next gig.Originally posted by tl97 View PostAsked to do training as part of a contract, and not be paid for the days doing the training - any views on this? And also from an IR35 perspective?
Any thoughts?
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- How a buyer’s market in UK property for 2026 is contractors’ double-edge sword Today 07:12
- Why PAYE overcharging by HMRC is every contractor’s problem Yesterday 06:26
- Government unveils ‘Umbrella Company Regulations consultation’ Feb 9 05:55
- JSL rules ‘are HMRC’s way to make contractor umbrella company clients give a sh*t where their money goes’ Feb 8 07:42
- Contractors warned over HMRC charging £3.5 billion too much Feb 6 03:18
- Statutory Sick Pay (SSP) for umbrella company contractors: an April 2026 explainer Feb 5 07:19
- IR35: IT contractors ‘most concerned about off-payroll working rules’ Feb 4 07:11
- Labour’s near-silence on its employment status shakeup is telling, and disappointing Feb 3 07:47
- Business expenses: What IT contractors can and cannot claim from HMRC Jan 30 08:44
- April’s umbrella PAYE risk: how contractors’ end-clients are prepping Jan 29 05:45

Leave a comment: