Originally posted by garethevans1986
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Phoenix Company - Serious thread
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Phoenix Company - Serious thread"
Collapse
-
the sheriff
-
Originally posted by vwdan View PostWhy should he? I'd be doing what I could to destroy them, personally.
Originally posted by Safe Collections View PostCompany A (your debtor company) is an entirely separate legal entity from Company B and generally speaking you can not pursue Company B for the debts of Company A.
It does not matter if the name is almost identical or if the directors/shareholders/registered office are the same as the company number will be different and that is the sole identifier that will be relevant.
However, if assets are transferred from Company A to Company B at less than market value and to the detriment of the creditors then technically this breaches company insolvency laws. The problem is proving that this has happened.
We suspect Company A will soon "cease trading" and Company B will launch. If that is the case the only way to force an investigation is to wind up Company A and ask the Official Receiver to look in to the asset transfer.
The likely cost of this is in the region of £2k to wind the company up with a further £1.5-2k in having the accounts audited/investigated and even then, there is no guarantee that the Official Receiver will take any action against the company or its directors.
In fact recent statistics would suggest you have a 95% chance of not being disqualified as a director even if you are reported to the Insolvency Service!
Given the situation you describe above, it would not seem to make commercial sense to wind up Company A as you would likely just double your losses.
Banks often use a personal guarantee but this has to be drawn up properly by a reputable solicitor that specialises in contractual work, it is not as simple as getting the Director to say "I personally guarantee this sum". Just so you know
I learnt that years ago at boo.com.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by garethevans1986 View PostAll,
Right then, bit a of a long story. Ill try and keep it short.
Was subcontract some development work 14 months ago, no contracts but verbal agreements and confirmed via email, did the work, delivered on time, website went live.....client then said "not got the money to pay you", loads of excuses, push came to shove, started Small Claims Court action in Feb 2014, went to court in Sept, client turned up unrepresented, was ripped apart by our barrister and Judge even tore the client a new one too lol. We won outright Client must pay us the full sum owed, plus fees, plus travel expenses, plus loss of earnings (up to £90) etc etc Note to newbies - emails proved alot and helped in court.
Anyway, client still didnt pay, so we kicked the case up to the High court who sent the sheriffs in. Client has assets (bearing in mind they are an IT company developing software/websites) one laptop and one printer to roughly £250. The total debt is roughly £3500.
The client has now agreed to pay £100 per month.
It turns out that this client also owes HMRC £5k+ and where their offices are £2k (behind 6 months on their rent) which we only found out in August this year.
I've just looked tonight and this client has setup a brand new Limited Company in November, it has a different name but same single director. There is no SIC code on the new company yet.
We will be speaking to our solicitor next week but was wondering whether anybody else has had the same experience and/or what routes we could potentially go down.
Thanks in advanced.
GE
It does not matter if the name is almost identical or if the directors/shareholders/registered office are the same as the company number will be different and that is the sole identifier that will be relevant.
However, if assets are transferred from Company A to Company B at less than market value and to the detriment of the creditors then technically this breaches company insolvency laws. The problem is proving that this has happened.
We suspect Company A will soon "cease trading" and Company B will launch. If that is the case the only way to force an investigation is to wind up Company A and ask the Official Receiver to look in to the asset transfer.
The likely cost of this is in the region of £2k to wind the company up with a further £1.5-2k in having the accounts audited/investigated and even then, there is no guarantee that the Official Receiver will take any action against the company or its directors.
In fact recent statistics would suggest you have a 95% chance of not being disqualified as a director even if you are reported to the Insolvency Service!
Given the situation you describe above, it would not seem to make commercial sense to wind up Company A as you would likely just double your losses.
Originally posted by Scratch It View Post/
Do you have a personal guarantee from the director? If not you are stuck unfortunately - unless HMRC pursue legal action though as a civil matter you are very unlikely to see your fees paid unfortunately.
For reference, a personal guarantee places the financial liability with the director rather than the limited company. Banks use this all of the time with credit for new companies with no credit history.
This is also a lesson for checking the credit worthiness of companies prior to completing work. A lot of smaller companies have recommended credit limits of less than £500. I am flabbergasted that contractors don't do this more often (not to say that the OP didnt, talking generally here).Last edited by Safe Collections; 23 December 2014, 11:41.
Leave a comment:
-
I would have talked to a collections company before a solicitor.
There is little point taking a company to court if they have no assets and a debt to HMRC. (As you are finding.)
A few lawyers I know and met always advocate making a private arrangement with any debtor then only enforcing the payment plan in court when they stray from this arrangement.
Also I'm puzzled why you used a solicitor for a small claim as you can't claim the fees back and this adds to your losses.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by garethevans1986 View PostAll,
Right then, bit a of a long story. Ill try and keep it short.
Was subcontract some development work 14 months ago, no contracts but verbal agreements and confirmed via email, did the work, delivered on time, website went live.....client then said "not got the money to pay you", loads of excuses, push came to shove, started Small Claims Court action in Feb 2014, went to court in Sept, client turned up unrepresented, was ripped apart by our barrister and Judge even tore the client a new one too lol. We won outright Client must pay us the full sum owed, plus fees, plus travel expenses, plus loss of earnings (up to £90) etc etc Note to newbies - emails proved alot and helped in court.
Anyway, client still didnt pay, so we kicked the case up to the High court who sent the sheriffs in. Client has assets (bearing in mind they are an IT company developing software/websites) one laptop and one printer to roughly £250. The total debt is roughly £3500.
The client has now agreed to pay £100 per month.
It turns out that this client also owes HMRC £5k+ and where their offices are £2k (behind 6 months on their rent) which we only found out in August this year.
I've just looked tonight and this client has setup a brand new Limited Company in November, it has a different name but same single director. There is no SIC code on the new company yet.
We will be speaking to our solicitor next week but was wondering whether anybody else has had the same experience and/or what routes we could potentially go down.
Thanks in advanced.
GE
Do you have a personal guarantee from the director? If not you are stuck unfortunately - unless HMRC pursue legal action though as a civil matter you are very unlikely to see your fees paid unfortunately.
For reference, a personal guarantee places the financial liability with the director rather than the limited company. Banks use this all of the time with credit for new companies with no credit history.
This is also a lesson for checking the credit worthiness of companies prior to completing work. A lot of smaller companies have recommended credit limits of less than £500. I am flabbergasted that contractors don't do this more often (not to say that the OP didnt, talking generally here).
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by FarmerPalmer View PostThis is what "limited liability" company structures, and serial entrepreneurship is all about. If your business fails, you shut it down, at no personal loss to the directors unless they can be proven to be grossly negligent, and then free to try again.
You can always bankrupt the original company, but since there's no money there's not a lot of point. If you can prove the guy was trading while knowingly insolvent - a big IF - you can sue him personally and at least bugger up his new business.
If all else fails, you can write the debt off and at least get the CT relief on it.
Leave a comment:
-
This is what "limited liability" company structures, and serial entrepreneurship is all about. If your business fails, you shut it down, at no personal loss to the directors unless they can be proven to be grossly negligent, and then free to try again.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by garethevans1986 View PostAll,
Right then, bit a of a long story. Ill try and keep it short.
Was subcontract some development work 14 months ago, no contracts but verbal agreements and confirmed via email, did the work, delivered on time, website went live.....client then said "not got the money to pay you", loads of excuses, push came to shove, started Small Claims Court action in Feb 2014, went to court in Sept, client turned up unrepresented, was ripped apart by our barrister and Judge even tore the client a new one too lol. We won outright Client must pay us the full sum owed, plus fees, plus travel expenses, plus loss of earnings (up to £90) etc etc Note to newbies - emails proved alot and helped in court.
Anyway, client still didnt pay, so we kicked the case up to the High court who sent the sheriffs in. Client has assets (bearing in mind they are an IT company developing software/websites) one laptop and one printer to roughly £250. The total debt is roughly £3500.
The client has now agreed to pay £100 per month.
It turns out that this client also owes HMRC £5k+ and where their offices are £2k (behind 6 months on their rent) which we only found out in August this year.
I've just looked tonight and this client has setup a brand new Limited Company in November, it has a different name but same single director. There is no SIC code on the new company yet.
We will be speaking to our solicitor next week but was wondering whether anybody else has had the same experience and/or what routes we could potentially go down.
Thanks in advanced.
GE
Leave a comment:
-
Phoenix Company - Serious thread
All,
Right then, bit a of a long story. Ill try and keep it short.
Was subcontract some development work 14 months ago, no contracts but verbal agreements and confirmed via email, did the work, delivered on time, website went live.....client then said "not got the money to pay you", loads of excuses, push came to shove, started Small Claims Court action in Feb 2014, went to court in Sept, client turned up unrepresented, was ripped apart by our barrister and Judge even tore the client a new one too lol. We won outright Client must pay us the full sum owed, plus fees, plus travel expenses, plus loss of earnings (up to £90) etc etc Note to newbies - emails proved alot and helped in court.
Anyway, client still didnt pay, so we kicked the case up to the High court who sent the sheriffs in. Client has assets (bearing in mind they are an IT company developing software/websites) one laptop and one printer to roughly £250. The total debt is roughly £3500.
The client has now agreed to pay £100 per month.
It turns out that this client also owes HMRC £5k+ and where their offices are £2k (behind 6 months on their rent) which we only found out in August this year.
I've just looked tonight and this client has setup a brand new Limited Company in November, it has a different name but same single director. There is no SIC code on the new company yet.
TL;DR:
Company owes us money, started Small Claims Court action, ended up in court, won court case, still didnt pay, High Court sheriffs managed to get them to pay us £100 a month on debt of ~£3500. Director of client company has setup a new company with different name.
Thanks in advanced.
GETags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Spot the hidden contractor Dec 20 10:43
- Accounting for Contractors Dec 19 15:30
- Chartered Accountants with MarchMutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants with March Mutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants Dec 19 15:05
- Unfairly barred from contracting? Petrofac just paid the price Dec 19 09:43
- An IR35 case law look back: contractor must-knows for 2025-26 Dec 18 09:30
- A contractor’s Autumn Budget financial review Dec 17 10:59
- Why limited company working could be back in vogue in 2025 Dec 16 09:45
- Expert Accounting for Contractors: Trusted by thousands Dec 12 14:47
Leave a comment: