Do you think I will get a reply?

Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

quackhandle replied

18 November 2014, 16:51
Originally posted by TheFaQQer View Post

If you didn't send a CV, they won't have even read it.

+1. Remember chatting to one rather hostile Rullion agent lady last year, after 5 mins trying to get some details of the role from her:

Her: And also all our potential candidates must sign the Opt Out agreement before going forward...
Me: <click> brrrrrrrrrrr

qh
Leave a comment:
TheFaQQer replied

18 November 2014, 16:33
Originally posted by kevpuk View Post

So, got an email from a Rullion pimp today for a role (actually not too bad, but not looking...) and so I politely replied to the effect of not currently looking....but could not resist throwing in "Out of curiosity, what is Rullion’s current stance on the Conduct of Employment Agencies 2003 (Opt-Out) rules? Are you now considering candidates on merit and not their opt in/out stance?"

Place your bets.....

If you didn't send a CV, they won't have even read it.
Leave a comment:
northernladuk replied

18 November 2014, 16:22
Originally posted by SimonMac View Post

They would have hit delete after reading you're not looking so wouldn't even get down to the question

+1
Leave a comment:
Project Monkey replied

18 November 2014, 16:22
Originally posted by kevpuk View Post

So, got an email from a Rullion pimp today for a role (actually not too bad, but not looking...) and so I politely replied to the effect of not currently looking....but could not resist throwing in "Out of curiosity, what is Rullion’s current stance on the Conduct of Employment Agencies 2003 (Opt-Out) rules? Are you now considering candidates on merit and not their opt in/out stance?"

Place your bets.....

They wouldn't even understand the question.
Leave a comment:
SimonMac replied

18 November 2014, 16:10
Originally posted by kevpuk View Post

So, got an email from a Rullion pimp today for a role (actually not too bad, but not looking...) and so I politely replied to the effect of not currently looking....but could not resist throwing in "Out of curiosity, what is Rullion’s current stance on the Conduct of Employment Agencies 2003 (Opt-Out) rules? Are you now considering candidates on merit and not their opt in/out stance?"

Place your bets.....

They would have hit delete after reading you're not looking so wouldn't even get down to the question
Leave a comment:
kevpuk started a topic Do you think I will get a reply?

18 November 2014, 16:04
Do you think I will get a reply?

So, got an email from a Rullion pimp today for a role (actually not too bad, but not looking...) and so I politely replied to the effect of not currently looking....but could not resist throwing in "Out of curiosity, what is Rullion’s current stance on the Conduct of Employment Agencies 2003 (Opt-Out) rules? Are you now considering candidates on merit and not their opt in/out stance?"

Place your bets.....
Tags: None