Reply to: Incompetent EU retailers not ready for brexit.

[Whorty]

Who gives a tulip about overpriced clothes?

Prices going up by a third is a benefit of brexit, do you still not see that stupid remainer? It will encourage UK companies to manufacture clothes so that this country can actually look after itself instead of relying on exports for everything.

[darmstadt]

I have as explained above, do try to keep up.

The british aren't complaining about it, its a consequence of Brexit and its therefore news.

You mean the EU has an Ambassador but no central tax authority? Seems a bit cart before the horse.

Do try to keep up with your own posting...

[darmstadt]

I have as explained above, do try to keep up.

Are you worried about something? You keep starting threads n the Brexit forum about trading with the EU? Why does this concern you, the UK has left, you should concern yourself with making Britain great again with all the benefits that this has brought instead of moaning about the little bit of red tape. Perhaps, though, you are getting a little bit squeaky bottom...

[vetran]

Once again vetran hasn't read an article he posted:

I have as explained above, do try to keep up.

[darmstadt]

The british aren't complaining about it, its a consequence of Brexit and its therefore news.

You mean the EU has an Ambassador but no central tax authority? Seems a bit cart before the horse.

Once again vetran hasn't read an article he posted:

British shoppers today complained about being hit with punishing 'Brexit fees' on purchases from Europe, which could add more than third to the cost of a new outfit.

[vetran]

No tulip sherlock, we're laughing at you as it seems to be only British people moaning about this. It's what you voted for. You do realise that UK companies have to register with 27 different extra countries now

The british aren't complaining about it, its a consequence of Brexit and its therefore news.

You mean the EU has an Ambassador but no central tax authority? Seems a bit cart before the horse.

[vetran]

Prices going up is a fecking benefit? and you are calling other stupid? Have you ever bought clothes made entirely in the UK? Lets say made from Scottish wool and actually put together in the UK? Next thing you'll be telling others how a diet made up entirely of British potatoes is the best thing ever. I think you are confusing the UK with China who can manufacture whatever they want fairly cheaply. And sure, yes, now all manufacturing will simply kick off magically in the UK overnight for everything and you'll have your great sovereign Britain yet again.

Most low end retail clothes are made in low cost countries such as India & Bangladesh though Boohoo & so on allegedly like to pay low wages in the UK.

Strangely most high end clothes are also made in low cost countries but sometimes have finishing touches attached in a European country a bit like cars where the seats are fitted in the UK being called made in Britain.

Where do you think You NIKE, Addidas, Peter storm, Levis etc are made?

We do make some clothes in the UK I have some Gortex Jackets and wool jumpers marked made in the UK but they aren't from Primark or Burton. But their stuff normally comes from low cost countries direct.

Clothing

Why just potatoes we can grow lots of vegetables in our climate. With Hydroponics you can grow most things. Other parts of the world also supply fruit & veg.

[darmstadt]

Actually Barmy has it half right, it is both ways despite the opening of the story being one sided. Imagine not being able to understand a Wail story. It is about not being in a single market and its obvious to anyone with half a brain. The British side is mainly about returns being too costly to repatriate as they are still goods.

1. UK people ordering from the EU retailers are being asked to pay additional customs fees, handling and VAT because EU retailers are not properly registered with HMRC (that is a UK body). These companies will also have to file the correct paperwork and possibly pay fees to repatriate their goods.

2. EU people ordering from the UK are being asked to pay vat and handling fees when they buy goods from the UK. On assumes the UK retailers haven't registered with the EU's equivalent of HMRC. These companies will have to file the correct paperwork and fees to repatriate the goods just as you would if you sell to all the other countries.

This is normal when you don't have a customs union. If you order something from Australia or Mexico exactly the same applies. This is the brexit we voted for. I just thought I would have a laugh at you remoaners and present detail number 1 as a one sided part of the argument, in your usual triumphant style and you get all confused.

This quote may be helpful

See incompetent EU orgs don't register with HMRC. You cherry picked the argument that supported you just like you normally do.

No tulip sherlock, we're laughing at you as it seems to be only British people moaning about this. It's what you voted for. You do realise that UK companies have to register with 27 different extra countries now

[TestMangler]

Actually Barmy has it half right, it is both ways despite the opening of the story being one sided. Imagine not being able to understand a Wail story. It is about not being in a single market and its obvious to anyone with half a brain. The British side is mainly about returns being too costly to repatriate as they are still goods.

1. UK people ordering from the EU retailers are being asked to pay additional customs fees, handling and VAT because EU retailers are not properly registered with HMRC (that is a UK body). These companies will also have to file the correct paperwork and possibly pay fees to repatriate their goods.

2. EU people ordering from the UK are being asked to pay vat and handling fees when they buy goods from the UK. On assumes the UK retailers haven't registered with the EU's equivalent of HMRC. These companies will have to file the correct paperwork and fees to repatriate the goods just as you would if you sell to all the other countries.

This is normal when you don't have a customs union. If you order something from Australia or Mexico exactly the same applies. This is the brexit we voted for. I just thought I would have a laugh at you remoaners and present detail number 1 as a one sided part of the argument, in your usual triumphant style and you get all confused.

This quote may be helpful

See incompetent EU orgs don't register with HMRC. You cherry picked the argument that supported you just like you normally do.

And you think you can laugh at people ? Ho Lee Fuk......

[vetran]

wrong again

Not too sure that vetran has got the gist of this but it's what he voted for:



These are not EU retailers but UK retailers who have sent stuff to customers in the EU as it quite clearly says...This is the same for any 3rd country that charges are incurred, it's just that with Britain once being in the single market hasn't realised that this now applies to them. If someone in France orders something from the USA, they'll have to pay those charges but they are already included in the price as it's been like that for a long time. Maybe British retailers could have foreseen this...

Actually Barmy has it half right, it is both ways despite the opening of the story being one sided. Imagine not being able to understand a Wail story. It is about not being in a single market and its obvious to anyone with half a brain. The British side is mainly about returns being too costly to repatriate as they are still goods.

1. UK people ordering from the EU retailers are being asked to pay additional customs fees, handling and VAT because EU retailers are not properly registered with HMRC (that is a UK body). These companies will also have to file the correct paperwork and possibly pay fees to repatriate their goods.

2. EU people ordering from the UK are being asked to pay vat and handling fees when they buy goods from the UK. On assumes the UK retailers haven't registered with the EU's equivalent of HMRC. These companies will have to file the correct paperwork and fees to repatriate the goods just as you would if you sell to all the other countries.

This is normal when you don't have a customs union. If you order something from Australia or Mexico exactly the same applies. This is the brexit we voted for. I just thought I would have a laugh at you remoaners and present detail number 1 as a one sided part of the argument, in your usual triumphant style and you get all confused.

This quote may be helpful

'Some EU-based stores have stopped selling to the UK entirely because of the mess.'
..
It is believed that the issues can be ironed out over the next few months as more EU retailers register with HMRC.

See incompetent EU orgs don't register with HMRC. You cherry picked the argument that supported you just like you normally do.

[dsc]

Who gives a tulip about overpriced clothes?

Prices going up by a third is a benefit of brexit, do you still not see that stupid remainer? It will encourage UK companies to manufacture clothes so that this country can actually look after itself instead of relying on exports for everything.

Prices going up is a fecking benefit? and you are calling other stupid? Have you ever bought clothes made entirely in the UK? Lets say made from Scottish wool and actually put together in the UK? Next thing you'll be telling others how a diet made up entirely of British potatoes is the best thing ever. I think you are confusing the UK with China who can manufacture whatever they want fairly cheaply. And sure, yes, now all manufacturing will simply kick off magically in the UK overnight for everything and you'll have your great sovereign Britain yet again.

[clearedforlanding]

Not too sure that vetran has got the gist of this but it's what he voted for:



These are not EU retailers but UK retailers who have sent stuff to customers in the EU as it quite clearly says...This is the same for any 3rd country that charges are incurred, it's just that with Britain once being in the single market hasn't realised that this now applies to them. If someone in France orders something from the USA, they'll have to pay those charges but they are already included in the price as it's been like that for a long time. Maybe British retailers could have foreseen this...

Thanks Darmy for explaining to those that cannot read.

[darmstadt]

Not too sure that vetran has got the gist of this but it's what he voted for:

High Street retailers and luxury brands could BURN items ordered in EU rather than bringing them back to Britain to avoid cost and hassle of Brexit red tape - as internet shoppers see prices rise by a THIRD on EU products

These are not EU retailers but UK retailers who have sent stuff to customers in the EU as it quite clearly says...This is the same for any 3rd country that charges are incurred, it's just that with Britain once being in the single market hasn't realised that this now applies to them. If someone in France orders something from the USA, they'll have to pay those charges but they are already included in the price as it's been like that for a long time. Maybe British retailers could have foreseen this...

[cannon999]

Surely you mean imports? Did you write this while in an incandescent rage, your face turning purple and steam coming out of your ears? Out of interest, where are the British cotton fields?

Yes.. exactly - where? Maybe because we don't have them due to imports being too cheap for British grown products to be able to compete?

[darmstadt]

Who gives a tulip about overpriced clothes?

Prices going up by a third is a benefit of brexit, do you still not see that stupid remainer? It will encourage UK companies to manufacture clothes so that this country can actually look after itself instead of relying on exports for everything.

Surely you mean imports? Did you write this while in an incandescent rage, your face turning purple and steam coming out of your ears? Out of interest, where are the British cotton fields?