Originally posted by cannon999
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Incompetent EU retailers not ready for brexit."
Collapse
-
Originally posted by vetran View PostI have as explained above, do try to keep up.Originally posted by vetranThe british aren't complaining about it, its a consequence of Brexit and its therefore news.
You mean the EU has an Ambassador but no central tax authority? Seems a bit cart before the horse.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by vetran View PostI have as explained above, do try to keep up.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by vetran View PostThe british aren't complaining about it, its a consequence of Brexit and its therefore news.
You mean the EU has an Ambassador but no central tax authority? Seems a bit cart before the horse.
British shoppers today complained about being hit with punishing 'Brexit fees' on purchases from Europe, which could add more than third to the cost of a new outfit.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by darmstadt View PostNo tulip sherlock, we're laughing at you as it seems to be only British people moaning about this. It's what you voted for. You do realise that UK companies have to register with 27 different extra countries now
The british aren't complaining about it, its a consequence of Brexit and its therefore news.
You mean the EU has an Ambassador but no central tax authority? Seems a bit cart before the horse.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by dsc View PostPrices going up is a fecking benefit? and you are calling other stupid? Have you ever bought clothes made entirely in the UK? Lets say made from Scottish wool and actually put together in the UK? Next thing you'll be telling others how a diet made up entirely of British potatoes is the best thing ever. I think you are confusing the UK with China who can manufacture whatever they want fairly cheaply. And sure, yes, now all manufacturing will simply kick off magically in the UK overnight for everything and you'll have your great sovereign Britain yet again.
Most low end retail clothes are made in low cost countries such as India & Bangladesh though Boohoo & so on allegedly like to pay low wages in the UK.
Strangely most high end clothes are also made in low cost countries but sometimes have finishing touches attached in a European country a bit like cars where the seats are fitted in the UK being called made in Britain.
Where do you think You NIKE, Addidas, Peter storm, Levis etc are made?
We do make some clothes in the UK I have some Gortex Jackets and wool jumpers marked made in the UK but they aren't from Primark or Burton. But their stuff normally comes from low cost countries direct.
Clothing
Why just potatoes we can grow lots of vegetables in our climate. With Hydroponics you can grow most things. Other parts of the world also supply fruit & veg.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by vetran View PostActually Barmy has it half right, it is both ways despite the opening of the story being one sided. Imagine not being able to understand a Wail story. It is about not being in a single market and its obvious to anyone with half a brain. The British side is mainly about returns being too costly to repatriate as they are still goods.
1. UK people ordering from the EU retailers are being asked to pay additional customs fees, handling and VAT because EU retailers are not properly registered with HMRC (that is a UK body). These companies will also have to file the correct paperwork and possibly pay fees to repatriate their goods.
2. EU people ordering from the UK are being asked to pay vat and handling fees when they buy goods from the UK. On assumes the UK retailers haven't registered with the EU's equivalent of HMRC. These companies will have to file the correct paperwork and fees to repatriate the goods just as you would if you sell to all the other countries.
This is normal when you don't have a customs union. If you order something from Australia or Mexico exactly the same applies. This is the brexit we voted for. I just thought I would have a laugh at you remoaners and present detail number 1 as a one sided part of the argument, in your usual triumphant style and you get all confused.
This quote may be helpful
See incompetent EU orgs don't register with HMRC. You cherry picked the argument that supported you just like you normally do.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by vetran View PostActually Barmy has it half right, it is both ways despite the opening of the story being one sided. Imagine not being able to understand a Wail story. It is about not being in a single market and its obvious to anyone with half a brain. The British side is mainly about returns being too costly to repatriate as they are still goods.
1. UK people ordering from the EU retailers are being asked to pay additional customs fees, handling and VAT because EU retailers are not properly registered with HMRC (that is a UK body). These companies will also have to file the correct paperwork and possibly pay fees to repatriate their goods.
2. EU people ordering from the UK are being asked to pay vat and handling fees when they buy goods from the UK. On assumes the UK retailers haven't registered with the EU's equivalent of HMRC. These companies will have to file the correct paperwork and fees to repatriate the goods just as you would if you sell to all the other countries.
This is normal when you don't have a customs union. If you order something from Australia or Mexico exactly the same applies. This is the brexit we voted for. I just thought I would have a laugh at you remoaners and present detail number 1 as a one sided part of the argument, in your usual triumphant style and you get all confused.
This quote may be helpful
See incompetent EU orgs don't register with HMRC. You cherry picked the argument that supported you just like you normally do.
Leave a comment:
-
wrong again
Originally posted by darmstadt View PostNot too sure that vetran has got the gist of this but it's what he voted for:
These are not EU retailers but UK retailers who have sent stuff to customers in the EU as it quite clearly says...This is the same for any 3rd country that charges are incurred, it's just that with Britain once being in the single market hasn't realised that this now applies to them. If someone in France orders something from the USA, they'll have to pay those charges but they are already included in the price as it's been like that for a long time. Maybe British retailers could have foreseen this...
Actually Barmy has it half right, it is both ways despite the opening of the story being one sided. Imagine not being able to understand a Wail story. It is about not being in a single market and its obvious to anyone with half a brain. The British side is mainly about returns being too costly to repatriate as they are still goods.
1. UK people ordering from the EU retailers are being asked to pay additional customs fees, handling and VAT because EU retailers are not properly registered with HMRC (that is a UK body). These companies will also have to file the correct paperwork and possibly pay fees to repatriate their goods.
2. EU people ordering from the UK are being asked to pay vat and handling fees when they buy goods from the UK. On assumes the UK retailers haven't registered with the EU's equivalent of HMRC. These companies will have to file the correct paperwork and fees to repatriate the goods just as you would if you sell to all the other countries.
This is normal when you don't have a customs union. If you order something from Australia or Mexico exactly the same applies. This is the brexit we voted for. I just thought I would have a laugh at you remoaners and present detail number 1 as a one sided part of the argument, in your usual triumphant style and you get all confused.
This quote may be helpful'Some EU-based stores have stopped selling to the UK entirely because of the mess.'
..
It is believed that the issues can be ironed out over the next few months as more EU retailers register with HMRC.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by cannon999 View PostWho gives a tulip about overpriced clothes?
Prices going up by a third is a benefit of brexit, do you still not see that stupid remainer? It will encourage UK companies to manufacture clothes so that this country can actually look after itself instead of relying on exports for everything.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by darmstadt View PostNot too sure that vetran has got the gist of this but it's what he voted for:
These are not EU retailers but UK retailers who have sent stuff to customers in the EU as it quite clearly says...This is the same for any 3rd country that charges are incurred, it's just that with Britain once being in the single market hasn't realised that this now applies to them. If someone in France orders something from the USA, they'll have to pay those charges but they are already included in the price as it's been like that for a long time. Maybe British retailers could have foreseen this...
Leave a comment:
-
Not too sure that vetran has got the gist of this but it's what he voted for:
High Street retailers and luxury brands could BURN items ordered in EU rather than bringing them back to Britain to avoid cost and hassle of Brexit red tape - as internet shoppers see prices rise by a THIRD on EU products
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by darmstadt View PostSurely you mean imports? Did you write this while in an incandescent rage, your face turning purple and steam coming out of your ears? Out of interest, where are the British cotton fields?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by cannon999 View PostWho gives a tulip about overpriced clothes?
Prices going up by a third is a benefit of brexit, do you still not see that stupid remainer? It will encourage UK companies to manufacture clothes so that this country can actually look after itself instead of relying on exports for everything.
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Streamline Your Retirement with iSIPP: A Solution for Contractor Pensions Sep 1 09:13
- Making the most of pension lump sums: overview for contractors Sep 1 08:36
- Umbrella company tribunal cases are opening up; are your wages subject to unlawful deductions, too? Aug 31 08:38
- Contractors, relabelling 'labour' as 'services' to appear 'fully contracted out' won't dupe IR35 inspectors Aug 31 08:30
- How often does HMRC check tax returns? Aug 30 08:27
- Work-life balance as an IT contractor: 5 top tips from a tech recruiter Aug 30 08:20
- Autumn Statement 2023 tipped to prioritise mental health, in a boost for UK workplaces Aug 29 08:33
- Final reminder for contractors to respond to the umbrella consultation (closing today) Aug 29 08:09
- Top 5 most in demand cyber security contract roles Aug 25 08:38
- Changes to the right to request flexible working are incoming, but how will contractors be affected? Aug 24 08:25
Leave a comment: