• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Reply to: Japan Trade deal!

Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Japan Trade deal!"

Collapse

  • darmstadt
    replied
    Originally posted by zerosum View Post
    Decent skewering of the deal here, Truss looks about as happy as Johnson/Gove the morning after the Ref; https://twitter.com/EmilyThornberry/...171888133?s=20
    She's also one of those who have swapped sides to further her own aims:

    Leave a comment:


  • zerosum
    replied
    Decent skewering of the deal here, Truss looks about as happy as Johnson/Gove the morning after the Ref; https://twitter.com/EmilyThornberry/...171888133?s=20

    Leave a comment:


  • darmstadt
    replied
    These Free Trade Zones aren't all they're cracked up to be: China imposes swingeing tariffs on Australian wine in 'devastating blow' to exporters | International trade | The Guardian

    Leave a comment:


  • darmstadt
    replied
    Should be finalised sometime in October...slowly more details are emerging and this might cause concern to some people:

    Under the new deal, the UK and Japan have agreed to the “free flow of data” by not enforcing localisation requirements. This will allow Japanese conglomerates like Sony, and British fintech firms, such as Revolut and Transferwise, to operate from offshore servers.

    The two countries also said that they would not mandate disclosure of source code of their software or algorithms, or share encryption information.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mordac
    replied
    Originally posted by DealorNoDeal View Post
    We haven't had to negotiate trade deals for several decades, so we may not have very experienced negotiators. Maybe we should consider outsourcing this. Maybe the EU could lend us their team?
    After what was probably the shortest meeting on record, we've gone with Australia.

    Leave a comment:


  • GhostofTarbera
    replied
    Originally posted by DealorNoDeal View Post
    We haven't had to negotiate trade deals for several decades, so we may not have very experienced negotiators. Maybe we should consider outsourcing this. Maybe the EU could lend us their team?
    Surly we just send in the Royal Navy to blockade their ports


    Sent from my iPhone using Contractor UK Forum

    Leave a comment:


  • DealorNoDeal
    replied
    Originally posted by Paddy View Post
    Basically, the UK has agreed much stricter state aid rules than what the EU insist upon and the UK rejected with the EU. The UK - Japan deal leaves the UK much worse off than the current EU - Japan deal. Another triumph for Brex-shi***s.
    We haven't had to negotiate trade deals for several decades, so we may not have very experienced negotiators. Maybe we should consider outsourcing this. Maybe the EU could lend us their team?

    Leave a comment:


  • PCTNN
    replied
    Wait, does it mean that Japan holds some cards?

    Or, the UK doesn't hold any?

    Which one is it?

    Leave a comment:


  • darmstadt
    replied
    Put succinctly:

    “What’s intriguing is in these international agreements it is really normal for both parties to put restrictions on the other country, so that they know that country won’t pull a fast one, and start dumping things or subsidising their own industries.

    “So when it comes to things like state aid and food standards, you show your cards and you tell the other party in that agreement how you’re going to manage those things.”

    "And when it’s Japan, it seems OK for us to say ‘this is what we’ll do on state aid, happy to sign up for that. This is what we’ll do on food, let’s sign up for that’."

    “As soon as it’s the European Union, those reasonable negotiated agreements between countries turn out to be ‘an assault on our democracy’ and ‘how dare they ask us to know how we’re going to manage food standards’.


    “You have to remember the UK was the country that managed to generate BSE by having bad food standards.


    “It’s not surprising that any country - EU, Japan or any country we negotiate with - will ask what our food standards will be and not want food to come into their country or bloc unless they know what they are.”


    “I think we should be more comfortable in setting out things like our state aid, or our food standards, and just accept that is the normal part of international treaties and once you’ve signed them they have to be binding.”

    Leave a comment:


  • Paddy
    replied
    Basically, the UK has agreed much stricter state aid rules than what the EU insist upon and the UK rejected with the EU. The UK - Japan deal leaves the UK much worse off than the current EU - Japan deal. Another triumph for Brex-shi***s.

    Leave a comment:


  • Whorty
    replied
    Originally posted by darmstadt View Post
    If you Google 'japan trade deal state aid' and click on the FTP link, for some reason it's not behind a paywall

    A little bit here: https://www.forexlive.com/news/!/uks...e-aid-20200913

    And here: UK negotiating position in Brexit talks seriously undermined after agreeing to tough state aid rules in Japan deal, legal experts claim | The New European
    Not being funny, but most people are pretty lazy (me included) so if you want people to read something it's best to make it easy for them rather than linking to a paywall article, then suggesting they do a search to find a different article.

    I'm sure your article is a good one, but very few will read it which will lose the message you're trying to get across.

    Leave a comment:


  • darmstadt
    replied
    Originally posted by Whorty View Post
    Behind a paywall! Really not worth sharing articles with no explanation what is there if most of us can't read the content.
    If you Google 'japan trade deal state aid' and click on the FTP link, for some reason it's not behind a paywall

    A little bit here: https://www.forexlive.com/news/!/uks...e-aid-20200913

    And here: UK negotiating position in Brexit talks seriously undermined after agreeing to tough state aid rules in Japan deal, legal experts claim | The New European

    Leave a comment:


  • Old Greg
    replied
    Originally posted by Whorty View Post
    Behind a paywall! Really not worth sharing articles with no explanation what is there if most of us can't read the content.
    And the headline alone has too many hard words for most Brexiteers:

    Japan trade deal commits UK to stricter state aid curbs than in EU talks

    Leave a comment:


  • Whorty
    replied
    Originally posted by darmstadt View Post
    Behind a paywall! Really not worth sharing articles with no explanation what is there if most of us can't read the content.

    Leave a comment:


  • darmstadt
    replied
    Hmmmm: Subscribe to read | Financial Times

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X