• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Finally a real country that will defend their fishermen!"

Collapse

  • Cirrus
    replied
    You don't seem to realise what happened last Friday...

    Originally posted by tazdevil View Post
    The UK needs to get real and stop pretending they can stand up to a bully the size of the EU
    FTFY

    Leave a comment:


  • Mordac
    replied
    Originally posted by WTFH View Post
    It seems you have a poor understanding of fishing.

    The UK fishing quotas are mostly owned by private investors who sell them. Over half our quotas have been sold to foreign fishing vessels.

    A number of UK fishing ports went down the pan when the quotas were sold, but the CFP is blamed for that.
    The UK’s representative on fishing at the EU refused to take part, debate or vote, saying it was a waste of time. As such he wasted his democratic mandate, then used his waste as an explanation of why things didn’t go his way.
    Quotas and territorial fishing rights are two very different things. The CFP is a complete mess, widely ignored and run by idiots. See EU ministers vote to allow overfishing despite legal deadline to heed scientists’ advice | The Independent
    Farage was right, debating the CFP is a total waste of time. We have an opportunity to walk away, and I hope we take it.

    Leave a comment:


  • tazdevil
    replied
    It's very poor form to come out demanding before getting down to actual negotiations. Barnier et al know that trade negotiations are just that negotiations and that if they want to fish in our waters they'll need to come to an agreement as we will with them for our boats to fish in their waters. Shouting orders and hinting that they'll burn our boats in French ports isn't a good way to negotiate anything because it just puts peoples backs up and will guarantee they won't get what they want. The EU needs to get real and stop pretending they can bully us

    Leave a comment:


  • GhostofTarbera
    replied
    Revealed: the millionaires hoarding UK fishing rights - Unearthed


    Sent from my iPhone using Contractor UK Forum

    Leave a comment:


  • WTFH
    replied
    Originally posted by original PM View Post
    Well no you see we have left the EU therefore the UK's fishing waters are now that - the UK's fishing waters.

    If non UK people want to use them then they need to agree a deal with the UK.

    A number of Uk fishing ports went down the pan when the common fisheries policy came into being.

    Also it is not really the best..

    more info here

    Common Fisheries Policy - Wikipedia

    Seems in this case the EU want to have their cake and eat it

    or our fish

    or something
    It seems you have a poor understanding of fishing.

    The UK fishing quotas are mostly owned by private investors who sell them. Over half our quotas have been sold to foreign fishing vessels.

    A number of UK fishing ports went down the pan when the quotas were sold, but the CFP is blamed for that.
    The UK’s representative on fishing at the EU refused to take part, debate or vote, saying it was a waste of time. As such he wasted his democratic mandate, then used his waste as an explanation of why things didn’t go his way.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mordac
    replied
    Originally posted by sal View Post
    I understand that fisheries are a hot topic. Still don't get it how anyone in their right mind would let this which forms like 0.05% of GDP jeopardise other areas like financial services with 15%+ of GDP.
    That figure would have been much higher, but for the theft/surrender of UK territorial waters in 1973. As for financial services, the EU have already legislated against London (by refusing ECB banking licenses to banks which only have token operations in the EU) but that may well backfire, with non-EU banks moving non-Euro settlement operations out of the EU, specifically to London, where the vast majority of that business already happens. Attempting to regulate a competitor out of business is standard EU tactics, but in this case they may well end up hurting their own financial centres more than London.

    Leave a comment:


  • original PM
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    “ Here's the EU's demand for access to Britain's fishing waters in black and white

    'The objective on fisheries should be to uphold Union fishing activities.

    'It should aim to avoid economic dislocation for Union fishermen that have traditionally fished in UK waters'”

    Brexit: Barnier publishes EU's draft negotiating guidelines for trade talks with UK - live news | Politics | The Guardian
    Well no you see we have left the EU therefore the UK's fishing waters are now that - the UK's fishing waters.

    If non UK people want to use them then they need to agree a deal with the UK.

    A number of Uk fishing ports went down the pan when the common fisheries policy came into being.

    Also it is not really the best..

    more info here

    Common Fisheries Policy - Wikipedia

    Seems in this case the EU want to have their cake and eat it

    or our fish

    or something

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by sal View Post
    I understand that fisheries are a hot topic. Still don't get it how anyone in their right mind would let this which forms like 0.05% of GDP jeopardise other areas like financial services with 15%+ of GDP.
    Fisheries more important to EU, which gives a tulip about "small" sectors, so Boris is only happy to leverage it in order to gain more concessions.

    Leave a comment:


  • wattaj
    replied
    Originally posted by sal View Post
    I understand that fisheries are a hot topic. Still don't get it how anyone in their right mind would let this which forms like 0.05% of GDP jeopardise other areas like financial services with 15%+ of GDP.
    Andrew Neil made the same point to a bemused Tory drone on Politics Live last week... it was a glorious take-down.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mordac
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    “ Here's the EU's demand for access to Britain's fishing waters in black and white

    'The objective on fisheries should be to uphold Union fishing activities.

    'It should aim to avoid economic dislocation for Union fishermen that have traditionally fished in UK waters'”

    Brexit: Barnier publishes EU's draft negotiating guidelines for trade talks with UK - live news | Politics | The Guardian
    Well done for acknowledging that the EU is a country. Some folks on here think it's still a trading block made up of independent nations.
    And while we're at it, they can do one.

    Leave a comment:


  • Eirikur
    replied
    Originally posted by sal View Post
    I understand that fisheries are a hot topic. Still don't get it how anyone in their right mind would let this which forms like 0.05% of GDP jeopardise other areas like financial services with 15%+ of GDP.
    Brexiteers and a right mind?

    Leave a comment:


  • Zigenare
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    “ Here's the EU's demand for access to Britain's fishing waters in black and white

    'The objective on fisheries should be to uphold Union fishing activities.

    'It should aim to avoid economic dislocation for Union fishermen that have traditionally fished in UK waters'”

    Brexit: Barnier publishes EU's draft negotiating guidelines for trade talks with UK - live news | Politics | The Guardian
    The EU can "aim" for whatever it wants - it ain't happening.

    Leave a comment:


  • sal
    replied
    I understand that fisheries are a hot topic. Still don't get it how anyone in their right mind would let this which forms like 0.05% of GDP jeopardise other areas like financial services with 15%+ of GDP.

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    started a topic Finally a real country that will defend their fishermen!

    Finally a real country that will defend their fishermen!

    “ Here's the EU's demand for access to Britain's fishing waters in black and white

    'The objective on fisheries should be to uphold Union fishing activities.

    'It should aim to avoid economic dislocation for Union fishermen that have traditionally fished in UK waters'”

    Brexit: Barnier publishes EU's draft negotiating guidelines for trade talks with UK - live news | Politics | The Guardian

Working...
X