Originally posted by meridian
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "What do Brexiters want after we leave the EU?"
Collapse
-
I can't ultimately disagree with you, but I find it ironic that the EU is happy to hand out multi-billion Euro fines to companies for breaching competition rules, and bans governments from providing state aid to industry, and yet fails spectacularly to apply those same principles to the way they run their own operations.
-
There’s certainly scope to reform CAP more, but you can’t argue that it hasn’t been reformed and then agree that in pure budget terms it’s reduced the proportional budget by nearly 50%. There have been other reforms on top, and more to come no doubt.Originally posted by Mordac View PostTechnically yes. Only 40% of the EU budget goes towards subsidising inefficient farming methods, keeping prices artificially high and punishing 3rd world producers with tariffs, thereby further protecting the already subsidised farmers. That's either progress (it used to be 70%), or just dicking about, depending on your view.
The CFP is just plain ridiculous. Quotas mean that if you catch the wrong type of fish, you have to chuck the whole lot overboard (unless you're Spanish, in which case you ignore the quotas). How does that preserve stocks? How is a trawler captain supposed to know what is going to end up in his nets?
If you want dicking around, compare the CAP reductions to the entire fishing industry economic contribution. CFP is a nice drum to beat for the nationalists, but ultimately meaningless in the whole scheme of the U.K. economy.
Leave a comment:
-
Technically yes. Only 40% of the EU budget goes towards subsidising inefficient farming methods, keeping prices artificially high and punishing 3rd world producers with tariffs, thereby further protecting the already subsidised farmers. That's either progress (it used to be 70%), or just dicking about, depending on your view.Originally posted by Old Greg View PostThe CAP has been reformed.
The CFP is just plain ridiculous. Quotas mean that if you catch the wrong type of fish, you have to chuck the whole lot overboard (unless you're Spanish, in which case you ignore the quotas). How does that preserve stocks? How is a trawler captain supposed to know what is going to end up in his nets?
Leave a comment:
-
I agree, which is why I think the best option now is to leave the EU and join EFTA (which gives us the option to join the EEA), which already has a trade deal with China. That is the closest option to the best of both worlds, EU affiliation including access to the single market, and the ability to make trade deals (if we are able to find some able negotiators, which we clearly don't have currently) with the rest of the world. If we choose not to join the EEA, we don't have to accept total free movement, as I understand it.Originally posted by meridian View PostThat’s a distinct possibility. But if we’re not taken seriously by the EU, why would we be taken seriously by prospective trading partners such as China, the USA, India, etc.
Plus it solves the Irish border problem.
I'm guessing the catch is, if it were that simple, why isn't the Government pushing for this? Can the EU block our application to rejoin EFTA? Presumably not, as EFTA is completely separate and independent of the EU.
Leave a comment:
-
Megathread of the horrifically evil laws the EU have imposed against our will. A grand total of 72 out of 4514.
Jim Grace #FBPE on Twitter: "Brace for mega thread on "ALL THEM RULES INNIT"
There is a type of of brexiter who is motivated not by xenophobia, or Empire nostalgia, or buccaneering trade fantasies, but instead by "all them EU rules". Sadly they can never name a single one. So I have done some research..."
Highlights include:
EU: Ban on livestock growth-boosters with hormonal, thyrostatic or beta-agonist effects (carcinogenic residue in meat).
UK: Aw come on - a little bit of cancer never hurt no-one.
EU: Don't add tartaric acid to wine. And here's how tariffs on grapejuice from 3rd countries should be calculated.
UK: We LIKE adding dodgy things to wine. And the French, Spanish and Italian winemakers should do what WE say!
Leave a comment:
-
That just shows how deep the conspiracy runs.Originally posted by meridian View PostThat’s a distinct possibility. But if we’re not taken seriously by the EU, why would we be taken seriously by prospective trading partners such as China, the USA, India, etc.
Is that why there’s an entire section on the history of CAP reforms in Wikipedia?
Common Agricultural Policy - Wikipedia
Leave a comment:
-
Reading this reaffirms my going 'short' position on the UK housing market when the right-wing loons want to take the country back to 1819. Them prices will do me nicely
Although I don't know if I have any shillings.
Leave a comment:
-
That’s a distinct possibility. But if we’re not taken seriously by the EU, why would we be taken seriously by prospective trading partners such as China, the USA, India, etc.Originally posted by Mordac View PostAfter what's happened in the last 3 years, I doubt that anything we say will ever be taken seriously again.
Is that why there’s an entire section on the history of CAP reforms in Wikipedia?Not that they ever listened when we proposed reforming the CAP and CFP.
Common Agricultural Policy - Wikipedia
Leave a comment:
-
I'm calling the people the Indy polled stupid. I'm sure they were specially selected to give yes answers to those utterly ridiculous questions. The Indy is a rag of the lowest order, and yet, Remainers post links to it every dayOriginally posted by AtW View PostAre you calling Brexiteers stupid?
I'd say that makes Remainers stupid.
Leave a comment:
-
After what's happened in the last 3 years, I doubt that anything we say will ever be taken seriously again. Not that they ever listened when we proposed reforming the CAP and CFP.Originally posted by meridian View Postbut at all times we would be in the inside influencing it.
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers


Leave a comment: