Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Given that the original referendum didn't have three options:
1. Hard Brexit
2. Soft Brexit
3. No Brexit
Because the snowflake brexit supporters wouldn't know what to vote for unless it was written on the side of a bus
Then why not just have "Accept deal" and "Reject deal"?
Personally, if there was an option under "Reject deal" about leaving the EU, then it should include having competent negotiators from each of the departments most affected: foreign office, home office, trade & industry, defence, etc. It would also be good if the negotiators were cross-party. But that will never happen. We are a democracy where you can't just buy votes, and the DUP will have the final say.
I think you'll find most of the snowflakes voted to remain. It was us racist bastards who didn't. According to you, anyway...
Don't see a second referendum, Britain is trundling towards the exit. The transition deal is a master stroke as it gets the UK out of the door before everything turns to sh*te.
Neither do the Tories, hence why negotiations are going nowhere and the likelihood of a hard brexit, hard border, return to the troubles is an ever-increasing possibility.
Both Labour and the Conservatives stood at the last election with a manifesto commitment to implement the result of the first one.
LibDems had a policy of re-running the vote, but they didn't do so well ...
UKIP got wiped out because they have served their purpose.
Article 50 has been invoked and the EU withdrawal bill has passed the commons, it's not clear whether A50 that can be unilaterally undone. The UK is leaving the EU on 29th March 2019. Deal or No-deal.
The Tories have spent vast amounts of political capital on this ... they are not just going to reverse their position and say "Hey, you wanna another chance to think about it?"
Labour still don't have a clear BREXIT position ( Corbyn has never been an EU supporter, he see's it as a mechanism for big-business and it puts restrictions on State aid )
There is no mechanism to stop it. It is going to happen.
For a second ref. You'd need to following:
Negotiations to have completed, with some sort of deal.
The government to completely change its position.
Legislation to be passed to allow a second ref. Then an argument about the question and then a 4 - 6 week period to actually hold the thing and because the negotiations won't finish until the last minute there won't be enough time.
Keep hearing calls for a referendum on the final Brexit deal. Simple question. Do these people want a balanced vote, ie:
1 Accept deal
2 Reject deal and stay in EU
3 Reject deal and leave EU
One suspects not. These "democrats" will not want the 3rd choice on the ballot paper.
Given that the original referendum didn't have three options:
1. Hard Brexit
2. Soft Brexit
3. No Brexit
Because the snowflake brexit supporters wouldn't know what to vote for unless it was written on the side of a bus
Then why not just have "Accept deal" and "Reject deal"?
Personally, if there was an option under "Reject deal" about leaving the EU, then it should include having competent negotiators from each of the departments most affected: foreign office, home office, trade & industry, defence, etc. It would also be good if the negotiators were cross-party. But that will never happen. We are a democracy where you can't just buy votes, and the DUP will have the final say.
Leave a comment: