• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Mad ex demands more money"

Collapse

  • darmstadt
    replied
    Originally posted by Mordac View Post
    The FT was a mouthpiece for the EU throughout the referendum campaign and since. Chances are anything the FT says on the subject of "negotiations" is is at least endorsed by the EU, and it's quite possible they were fed the story to make it seem more credible than it really is.
    So by this reckoning everything that the Mail, Express, Telegraph, et. al. who were all, and still are it seems, mouthpieces for the Leave campaign makes everything they say credible?

    Leave a comment:


  • Mordac
    replied
    Originally posted by darmstadt View Post
    That 92 billion is what the FT have figured out is the bill not the EU. Not an official figure at all so **** knows why everyone keeps banging on about it...



    (I have heard that it will in fact be more with daily interest )
    The FT was a mouthpiece for the EU throughout the referendum campaign and since. Chances are anything the FT says on the subject of "negotiations" is is at least endorsed by the EU, and it's quite possible they were fed the story to make it seem more credible than it really is.

    Leave a comment:


  • darmstadt
    replied
    Originally posted by squarepeg View Post
    That £92bn is probably pre-tax ;-)
    That 92 billion is what the FT have figured out is the bill not the EU. Not an official figure at all so **** knows why everyone keeps banging on about it...



    (I have heard that it will in fact be more with daily interest )

    Leave a comment:


  • squarepeg
    replied
    That £92bn is probably pre-tax ;-)

    Leave a comment:


  • SeededLoaf
    replied
    Disappointed. From the thread title I thought this was another contractor's ex wife on the grab

    But oh no it's about bl00dy brexit.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mordac
    replied
    Originally posted by scooterscot View Post
    Scotland has been saying this for years. Our oil money has been used to fund failed Westminster ideology throughout the decades, failed wars... I demand a refund
    FTFY

    (I'll let you have that with the alteration - I'm presuming you've been away so long you have forgotten which party leader put us in Iraq and Afghanistan.)

    Leave a comment:


  • scooterscot
    replied
    Originally posted by Mordac View Post
    We joined a trading block, and now we've decided to leave we find it's actually an extortion racket.
    Scotland has been saying this for years. Our oil money has been used to fund failed Tory ideology throughout the decades, failed wars... I demand a refund

    Leave a comment:


  • Mordac
    replied
    Originally posted by BlasterBates View Post
    I think we're all now agreed with the new bill at 100 billion, the original bill will seem like a bargain if they can get it.

    This is what O'Leary meant when he said everyone would wipe the floor with Britain.

    We joined a trading block, and now we've decided to leave we find it's actually an extortion racket. Of course their rhetoric isn't actually directed at the UK, it's aimed at the voters of France, and every other member state which might be contemplating a referendum of their own.

    Beyond 2019, we have some spending commitments up to 2020 (potentially our annual net contribution), and possibly some smaller commitments beyond that. The "bill" post 2019 should therefore be somewhere between £10bn and £20bn max. We would need to continue making pension contributions, or offer to "buy back" the pensions for UK MEPs and civil servants. We can deduct any UK assets, and negotiate a proportion of EU assets based on historic UK contributions.
    I doubt it will be too long before there is an unofficial boycott of certain EU products - I've already started with the French (no French Brie, wine or croissants from now on).
    Italy will be tricky - getting the missus to give up Prosecco will be harder than getting Trump off Twitter.
    Germany could be a real problem if any of our kitchen appliances fail between now and the conclusion of discussions.

    Buy British! (Unless it's crap, in which case buy something else).

    Leave a comment:


  • BlasterBates
    replied
    Originally posted by vetran View Post
    FTFY.
    I think we're all now agreed with the new bill at 100 billion, the original bill will seem like a bargain if they can get it.

    This is what O'Leary meant when he said everyone would wipe the floor with Britain.

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied
    Originally posted by BlasterBates View Post
    The original bill was Fantasy but TM decided not to bend over, so they've doubled the imaginary bill.

    FTFY.

    Leave a comment:


  • SueEllen
    replied
    Originally posted by VectraMan View Post
    Indeed. TM will now negotiate it down to €75bn and call it a victory.
    Otherwise she will get the Kinnocks and Mandeslime attacking her due to not getting their pensions.

    Leave a comment:


  • VectraMan
    replied
    Originally posted by BlasterBates View Post
    The original bill was 50 billion but TM decided to play hard ball, so they've doubled it.

    Indeed. TM will now negotiate it down to €75bn and call it a victory.

    Leave a comment:


  • BlasterBates
    replied
    The original bill was 50 billion but TM decided to play hard ball, so they've doubled it.

    Leave a comment:


  • BrilloPad
    replied
    Originally posted by scooterscot View Post
    If the UK does not pay its EU future obligations, the UK credit rating will be trashed and the economy will suffer another blow. Expect interest rates will go through the roof!
    KUATB

    http://forums.contractoruk.com/gener...ml#post2410455

    Leave a comment:


  • scooterscot
    replied
    If the UK does not pay its EU future obligations, the UK credit rating will be trashed and the economy will suffer another blow. Expect interest rates will go through the roof!

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X