Originally posted by CloudWalker
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on ""wholly and exclusively for business reasons" with two businesses?"
Collapse
-
Originally posted by Batcher View PostDuring my IR35 investigation, HMRC actually asked if the laptop I had purchased for the IT Consultancy Ltd company I was a director of was required for the running of the company. How was I supposed to run an IT company without any IT?
When I first started up and registered for VAT, the VATman sent me a "How To" video. I had to go out and buy a VCR through the company so I could watch it
Leave a comment:
-
During my IR35 investigation, HMRC actually asked if the laptop I had purchased for the IT Consultancy Ltd company I was a director of was required for the running of the company. How was I supposed to run an IT company without any IT?
When I first started up and registered for VAT, the VATman sent me a "How To" video. I had to go out and buy a VCR through the company so I could watch it
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by JRCT View PostI have misunderstood this one somewhere along the line. It hasn't applied to me thus far, so not really an issue I've needed to worry about, but I definitely remember, when I first started contracting, reading an example of a business journey to Edinburgh followed by a trip to Dundee to visit an aunt which rendered the whole journey unclaimable.
I can't remember whether the link was to HMRC, maybe someone will recognise the Dundee reference and remind me where I've got my wires crossed on this.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Clare@InTouch View PostInteresting, I've not heard that. I would have imagined that as assets get written off via AIA in year 1 they wouldn't care either way as the tax outcome is exactly the same.......?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by malvolio View PostNot true; you can claim relevant expenses for the first leg of the trip.
Get your head around corporate vs personal expenditure.
I can't remember whether the link was to HMRC, maybe someone will recognise the Dundee reference and remind me where I've got my wires crossed on this.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by TheCyclingProgrammer View PostNow there's an interesting idea. Buy the laptop through Company 1 and then lease it to Company 2 for a reasonable, but nominal fee.
But it wouldn't save you any tax overall as the tax saving for Company 2 would be offset by the tax in the income received by Company 1. It would remove any ambiguity though.
But probably a bit of pointless paper exercise?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by d000hg View PostBecause that's pretty bloody stupid if you have to carry two laptops around with you when you travel? Not to mention a bit wasteful.
One company could grant another permission to use its assets perhaps, if it were something other than a laptop? Maybe even for a nominal fee?
But it wouldn't save you any tax overall as the tax saving for Company 2 would be offset by the tax in the income received by Company 1. It would remove any ambiguity though.
But probably a bit of pointless paper exercise?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by malvolio View PostIf both need a laptop, why don't they both each buy their own?
One company could grant another permission to use its assets perhaps, if it were something other than a laptop? Maybe even for a nominal fee?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by JRCT View PostBut how is that different to me going from home to client 1, then from client 1 to visit my auntie marjorie in Stockport and then home?
In that scenario, I wouldn't be able to claim any of that journey.
Travel expenses: general: introduction: expenses do not have to be wholly and exclusively incurred: example
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by LisaContractorUmbrella View PostLast I heard from our dear friends at HMRC a laptop couldn't be expensed as there was an intrinsic duality of purpose - that's not saying that it couldn't be bought through the business but just that it would be recorded as an asset purchase - would you say that's right Clare?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by LisaContractorUmbrella View PostLast I heard from our dear friends at HMRC a laptop couldn't be expensed as there was an intrinsic duality of purpose - that's not saying that it couldn't be bought through the business but just that it would be recorded as an asset purchase - would you say that's right Clare?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by JRCT View PostBut how is that different to me going from home to client 1, then from client 1 to visit my auntie marjorie in Stockport and then home?
In that scenario, I wouldn't be able to claim any of that journey.
Get your head around corporate vs personal expenditure.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by TheCyclingProgrammer View PostActually I'd say the journey to Client 1 is wholly and exclusively for Ltd 1 and the journey from Client 1 to Client 2 and then home is for Ltd 2.
In that scenario, I wouldn't be able to claim any of that journey.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Clare@InTouch View PostWith a laptop you can have some personal use of it, so you could buy it on one company and use it on the other without any issues.
Other assets may be more complex as they wouldn't always have the "insignificant private use is ok" bit.
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Secondary NI threshold sinking to £5,000: a limited company director’s explainer Dec 24 09:51
- Reeves sets Spring Statement 2025 for March 26th Dec 23 09:18
- Spot the hidden contractor Dec 20 10:43
- Accounting for Contractors Dec 19 15:30
- Chartered Accountants with MarchMutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants with March Mutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants Dec 19 15:05
- Unfairly barred from contracting? Petrofac just paid the price Dec 19 09:43
- An IR35 case law look back: contractor must-knows for 2025-26 Dec 18 09:30
- A contractor’s Autumn Budget financial review Dec 17 10:59
Leave a comment: