Originally posted by skematicgnu
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: IR35 - really that much different?
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "IR35 - really that much different?"
Collapse
-
-
Thanks for the replies, although one or two seem to have taken my question the wrong way. I didn't want to come across arrogant etc and i'm certainly not looking for an offshore account! I just wondered as a first time contractor what the difference is. Like i said in the original post, £700 is a lot of money.. the question was asked because i was under the impression the difference would be more.
Thanks anyway guys.
Leave a comment:
-
The calculators are also based on you working all year and taking out all the company money, which gives misleading answers.
As a rule of thumb, IR35 costs you 20% on your net take home. It also buggers up pension provision to some extent, and makes maintaining a war chest for bench time somewhat problematic. And, of course, you're paying taxes you more than likely aren't actually liable for.
Leave a comment:
-
£700 difference is based on a sole shareholder I assume! The difference in take-home between being caught or exempt will increase if you have a second shareholder because if you are caught by IR35 then you won't have much (if anything at all) to pay out as dividends after you have taken an IR35 level salary. The difference between the two gets larger as you increase your daily rate.
Remember that over the course of a year the difference will be several thousand and I'd imagine that you'd rather have it in your pocket than hand it over to HMRC!
Craig
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by skematicgnu View Postit doesn't seem to make a massive difference in take home pay? i was expecting 1000's!
Sorry if that is not enough for you, perhaps you could join one of these offshore tax avoidance schemes where you pay about 10% of your income to the scheme provider and 2% of your income as tax? There are lots of schemes to choose from.
Leave a comment:
-
£700 a month isn't a lot? it is around a £15k a year wage to a permie. It's a lot to me!!
Leave a comment:
-
It depends how the calculator works and what assumptions it makes. The value of expenses, pension contributions and salary can make a huge difference. If you want a definitive comparison based on real figures then try giving an accountant a call. They'll be able to do some more accurate figures for you.
If you have two shareholders that can make a massive difference, and that's something a calculator cannot take into account.
Leave a comment:
-
IR35 - really that much different?
Hi all,
I'm a newbie to the forum and to the world of contracting. After a few years in IT testing i decided to set up Ltd and go it alone. However, IR35 is something that at the moment i am having big issues getting my head around. I have read through the 'rules and regs' and i know what status i am, however after looking at all these different calculators online it doesn't seem to make a massive difference in take home pay?
For example, one calculator says that on a basis of £350 a day for 48 weeks a year, the difference would be about £700 a month if i worked outside rather than in.. I appreciate that that's a big number, but i was expecting 1000's!
Is this right or am i missing something?
Thanks in advance!Tags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Secondary NI threshold sinking to £5,000: a limited company director’s explainer Dec 24 09:51
- Reeves sets Spring Statement 2025 for March 26th Dec 23 09:18
- Spot the hidden contractor Dec 20 10:43
- Accounting for Contractors Dec 19 15:30
- Chartered Accountants with MarchMutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants with March Mutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants Dec 19 15:05
- Unfairly barred from contracting? Petrofac just paid the price Dec 19 09:43
- An IR35 case law look back: contractor must-knows for 2025-26 Dec 18 09:30
- A contractor’s Autumn Budget financial review Dec 17 10:59
Leave a comment: