Hands up

Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

LisaContractorUmbrella replied

22 May 2012, 14:45
Originally posted by malvolio View Post

We're missing a trick here. If they want easily-disposable workers, why not use contractors? St Vince of Cable can't then complain about people losing their rights.

OTOH of course, he's the idiot that's presided over the export of our industry to India.

Where they probably have no rights at all. So, that worked well then
Leave a comment:
moggy replied

22 May 2012, 14:38
Originally posted by LisaContractorUmbrella View Post

Extort? So presumably the persuasion to use their services is of the gun to the head variety?

no people take those sorts of loans because they enjoy it.
Leave a comment:
LisaContractorUmbrella replied

22 May 2012, 14:34
Originally posted by moggy View Post

intelligent wealthy business man is allowed to extort from customers at wonga at 4000% rates of interest... hmmm fleece them all I say...

Extort? So presumably the persuasion to use their services is of the gun to the head variety?
Leave a comment:
malvolio replied

22 May 2012, 14:33
We're missing a trick here. If they want easily-disposable workers, why not use contractors? St Vince of Cable can't then complain about people losing their rights.

OTOH of course, he's the idiot that's presided over the export of our industry to India.
Leave a comment:
moggy replied

22 May 2012, 13:58
intelligent wealthy business man is allowed to extort from customers at wonga at 4000% rates of interest... hmmm fleece them all I say...
Leave a comment:
SimonMac replied

22 May 2012, 13:50
Originally posted by v8gaz View Post

Are you sure you're cut out for this linking lark
Leave a comment:
v8gaz replied

22 May 2012, 13:41
Originally posted by northernladuk View Post

It says...

Good stuff is
Bad stuff is
Will govt listen is

HTH

Are you sure you're cut out for this linking lark
Leave a comment:
LisaContractorUmbrella replied

22 May 2012, 13:22
Dummies Guide:

Intelligent, successful, wealthy businessman suggests to Government that less employment regulations inc. not implementing AWR and simplifying agency legislation would be a great idea that would improve the economy. Proposals include not having to go through hoops to get rid of someone who is rubbish at their job.

HTH
Leave a comment:
northernladuk replied

22 May 2012, 13:05
Originally posted by SimonMac View Post

Is there a Dummies Guide?

It says...

Good stuff is
Bad stuff is
Will govt listen is

HTH

Last edited by northernladuk; 22 May 2012, 18:22. Reason: Bloody smilie website making me look stupid!!
Leave a comment:
SimonMac replied

22 May 2012, 13:01
Is there a Dummies Guide?
Leave a comment:
LisaContractorUmbrella started a topic Hands up

22 May 2012, 12:54
Hands up

Sensible bloke that Beecroft BIS media information for journalists and the press - Image Library - Beecroft Report on Employment Law - BIS

Hands up anyone that thinks the Government will take a blind bit of notice
Tags: None