Originally posted by JeremyCK
View Post
The answer is that many UK companies just wouldn't deal with Manx registered companies. Now sure, if you're an established B2B company that regularly does business in the UK you might be in with a shot. But the reality is for a new micro-entity, it just isn't going to happen. The only thing that could perhaps get around it is to have a UK entity which is owned by a Manx entity.
Per Claude (AI):
Yes, using a UK company wholly owned by a Manx parent company could potentially get around some of the reluctance, but it comes with important caveats and risks:
How it could help:
- Appears as UK entity: A UK subsidiary is a separate legal entity governed under UK law, which provides credibility and commercial respectability UK: How can an overseas company establish a business presence in the UK? Is a UK "branch" the same as a UK subsidiary company?. From the client's perspective, they're contracting with a UK registered company.
- Meets basic requirements: Many companies require contractors to use UK registered limited companies and provide UK VAT certificates Payment to an off shore Company | AccountingWEB - a UK subsidiary would satisfy these requirements.
- Separate legal identity: A subsidiary is a separate legal entity to the overseas parent, which helps ring-fence liabilities.
However, there are significant risks and limitations:
IR35 still applies: Contractors trading via a UK-based limited company will find IR35 applies wherever in the world they are working Shout99 : Expert analysis: Isle of Man IR35 avoidance strategy flawed. The IR35 assessment would still be based on the working relationship, not the corporate structure.
HMRC scrutiny: HMRC has successfully challenged arrangements where UK subsidiaries were used to funnel payments to Isle of Man parents without proper tax deductions Supreme Court confirms UK parent company liability for acts or omissions of a foreign subsidiary: considerations for due diligence, restructurings and compliance. In one case, the tribunal found that a UK company making payments to its Isle of Man parent was required to make CIS deductions.
Additional compliance burden: UK subsidiaries come with various reporting requirements, annual accounts, corporation tax returns, and potential auditing requirements.
Substance requirements: The UK company would need genuine commercial substance and purpose beyond just being an intermediary. HMRC looks at the reality of arrangements, not just their legal form.
Potential for challenge: If the structure appears to be primarily for tax avoidance rather than genuine commercial reasons, it could be challenged as an artificial arrangement.
Bottom line: While a UK subsidiary structure might initially satisfy client requirements and get around the immediate reluctance to work with Isle of Man companies, it doesn't eliminate the underlying tax compliance issues that concern UK businesses. The IR35 rules would still apply, and HMRC has shown willingness to look through such structures where they appear to be primarily tax-motivated rather than commercially driven.
A contractor considering this approach would need specialist tax advice to ensure the structure has genuine commercial substance and complies with all relevant UK tax obligations.
Leave a comment: