Originally posted by goldilockz
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "What are the chances of actually being investigated?"
Collapse
-
But for a company with zero/ few expenses, I'm not sure it would be worthwhile with all the extra legwork involved in a limited company rather than umbrella company? I may be wrong though.Originally posted by SueEllen View PostNope.
You get a 5% allowance for expenses being within IR35 under a limited company as long as you don't work for the public sector.
Leave a comment:
-
Yes, but also operating inside IR35, I might as well go with an umbrella company surely?Originally posted by VectraMan View PostYou could always just be inside IR35. Nothing to worry about then.

Leave a comment:
-
You could always just be inside IR35. Nothing to worry about then.Originally posted by goldilockz View PostThanks to you all for the information. With regards to getting QDOS involved, would you recommend paying for tax enquiry insurance:
https://www.qdoscontractor.com/ir35/ir35-insurance
I want to take all the necessary precautions going into this limited company business!
Leave a comment:
-
Great, thank you. I'll look into this.Originally posted by malvolio View PostSo join IPSE and take out their Plus membership.
Leave a comment:
-
Thanks SueEllen.Originally posted by SueEllen View PostHow long have you been a limited company? If it's over a year so you have submitted company accounts then yes regardless.
If it is under as long as you are diligent in doing your VAT then you should be OK until you have submitted company accounts.
You should check out Hiscox and IPSE as well as QDOS. You should also ask your accountant if they have any cover that would cover you.
I have literally been a limited company for one week! That's why I'm trying to find the best option and cover my back as much as possible. I could do without the sleepless nights!
Leave a comment:
-
So join IPSE and take out their Plus membership.Originally posted by goldilockz View PostThanks to you all for the information. With regards to getting QDOS involved, would you recommend paying for tax enquiry insurance:
https://www.qdoscontractor.com/ir35/ir35-insurance
I want to take all the necessary precautions going into this limited company business!
Leave a comment:
-
How long have you been a limited company? If it's over a year so you have submitted company accounts then yes regardless.Originally posted by goldilockz View PostThanks to you all for the information. With regards to getting QDOS involved, would you recommend paying for tax enquiry insurance:
https://www.qdoscontractor.com/ir35/ir35-insurance
I want to take all the necessary precautions going into this limited company business!
If it is under as long as you are diligent in doing your VAT then you should be OK until you have submitted company accounts.
You should check out Hiscox and IPSE as well as QDOS. You should also ask your accountant if they have any cover that would cover you.
Leave a comment:
-
Exactly, and well worth the couple of hundred £ to get yourself covered. Personally I have IPSE+ membership but for no other reason that the insurance.Originally posted by northernladuk View PostWhich might be true but consider the fall out of being one of the few.
If the information in the thread was to continue to take it seriously and spend a bit of time and a little bit of money on proper diligence then yes, that is still very valid.
Leave a comment:
-
Thanks to you all for the information. With regards to getting QDOS involved, would you recommend paying for tax enquiry insurance:Originally posted by Cirrus View PostYour chances of investigation are low but what counts is if fate picks on you then you get QDOS or whoever engaged as soon as the Revenue come sniffing anywhere near you. They defend you vigorously and in most cases the Revenue slip up or more likely give up. It's not pleasant and it can drag out for a long time but they do seem to be very good at frustrating the Revenue - ruthlessly exploiting all their weaknesses.
I suspect the Revenue make their money, not by catching people but rather by the deterrent effect of somewhat token actions.
https://www.qdoscontractor.com/ir35/ir35-insurance
I want to take all the necessary precautions going into this limited company business!
Leave a comment:
-
Which might be true but consider the fall out of being one of the few.Originally posted by BlasterBates View PostThe chances of being investigated are still small and it looks like HMRC won't be pursuing individual contractors in any great numbers as they've switched their focus to agencies and clients making them enforce IR35 at least in the public sector. We'll need to see if they decide to extend this clampdown into the private sector, but that won't be for at least a year, and they maybe satisfied simply having clamped down on the public sector.
If the information in the thread was to continue to take it seriously and spend a bit of time and a little bit of money on proper diligence then yes, that is still very valid.
Leave a comment:
-
Your chances of investigation are low but what counts is if fate picks on you then you get QDOS or whoever engaged as soon as the Revenue come sniffing anywhere near you. They defend you vigorously and in most cases the Revenue slip up or more likely give up. It's not pleasant and it can drag out for a long time but they do seem to be very good at frustrating the Revenue - ruthlessly exploiting all their weaknesses.Originally posted by goldilockz View Postwould they likely avoid investigation?
I suspect the Revenue make their money, not by catching people but rather by the deterrent effect of somewhat token actions.
Leave a comment:
-
It depends if more companies are taken to court to argue people, their workers, are employees.Originally posted by BlasterBates View PostThe chances of being investigated are still small and it looks like HMRC won't be pursuing individual contractors in any great numbers as they've switched their focus to agencies and clients making them enforce IR35 at least in the public sector. We'll need to see if they decide to extend this clampdown into the private sector, but that won't be for at least a year, and they maybe satisfied simply having clamped down on the public sector.
I suspect at some point someone will take a pop at a government department.
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers

Leave a comment: