Originally posted by opc
View Post
In your examples, I think there is a distinction between trades which have their own standard premises who occasionally go onsite (mechanics, lawyers etc.) and those who are almost always onsite (plumbers, builders etc.). Those who are normally onsite would be expected to build their travelling time into their cost. The vast majority of contractors fit into the second category, but you seem to be indicating you are in the first.
But it changes very little contractually. ClientCo could simply argue that while you are travelling, you are not able to do any productive work and therefore they are not going to pay for it, unless it is specifically stated in the contract.
They could also argue that occasional onsite visits are simply part of the overall service you provide and if you feel that strongly about it, then decline the next renewal.
To sum it all up, there is no legal obligation for them to pay you for this time, nor is there an overriding industry precedent.
But you can always ask and see what they say...
HTH
Leave a comment: