Thanks all.
Client pays direct and so it never touches my books.
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: BIK for travel after 2 years
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "BIK for travel after 2 years"
Collapse
-
Back in 1995 I was commuting on a weekly basis to a client in France. I found in one of the IR brochures that home to office commuting was an allowable expense, if the office was in another country.
It would be interesting to see whether this still stands, and exactly what constitutes "another country".
Leave a comment:
-
If the client is paying directly, as you seem to be saying, the money never goes anywhere near YourCo's bank account so it can't become part of your taxation landscape (to coin a phrase
). So it can't be a BIK, nor does the 24 month rule apply.
If, however, YourCo is reimbursed for money spent, then the usual rules kick in again. From the OP, I don't think tha's the case though
Leave a comment:
-
Depends upon your working practices.
The 24 months rule kicks in when a temporary place of work becomes no longer judged (by HMRC) to be temporary. Cue references to other threads.
For example, if you're living in London (say) and fly on a regular basis to Belfast (say) then Belfast becomes your 'permanent' (hate that word) place of work after 24months/when you know it's going to exceed 24 months/other threads.
However, if you're living and working in London (say) and your client asks you to work in multiple locations, none of which individually accounts for more than 40% of your time, you can forget about the 24-month rule (well, not forget about it, but you may still claim the expenses without tax implications).
Hope you fall into the latter case.
Not sure of the implications of the client paying for flights directly......
RS
Leave a comment:
-
Can't see how. BIK is if the expense is "not wholly incurred during the course of normal business".
Unless this flight is for your holiday then you don't need to worry about it.
Leave a comment:
-
BIK for travel after 2 years
If your client pays for flights, does this become a BIK after being onsite for 2 years?
Note: client pays directly so I don't invoice for them (if it makes any difference).
TIA
PLTags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers

Leave a comment: