51/49 is the safest way to go.
Do you pay your wife a salary?
Part of the reason is so that you can demonstrate that you've got sufficient power within YourCo to be a sole signatory on a contract. They've no doubt been stiffed over by some dodgy contractor in the past who wanted to get out of a contract and went down the "well actually, I've not got a controlling interest in the business so you cannot hold me to it anyway" route. Easier to change their Ts & Cs and not pay them their remaining invoices than fight it.
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Majority shareholder
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Majority shareholder"
Collapse
-
We;ve got threads on this going as far back as 2013.
https://www.google.com/search?q=majo...hrome&ie=UTF-8
Do as CP says and off you go.
Leave a comment:
-
Ask them to change it. If they refuse, ask your wife if she'd be willing to transfer 1% back to you and if she agrees, problem solved. File the necessary paperwork, update the company records and report it on your next confirmation statement.
Leave a comment:
-
Majority shareholder
My agency is trying to force me into signing a new contract due to the new IR35 legislation. I am outside IR35and there are lots of new clauses one of which is that the representative (me) needs to have a majority shareholding in the Ltd Company. Does anyone have any idea why this might be there? Is this an IR35 thing or just some new clause they have decided to put into the contract? This is an issue for me as my wife and I have 50/50 shares. This was all set up by my accountant and there was no mention of a 50/50 split ever being an issue.Tags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Autumn Budget 2026: FCSA’s 5 contractor asks of John Healey Today 04:15
- Andy Burnham's Zoom gripe doesn’t apply to IT contractors, say recruiters Yesterday 03:41
- Check your Loan Recall paperwork for the Isle of Man: it could matter Aug 25 03:27
- Budget 2026: Contractor advisers ask for ‘IR35 reset’ Aug 24 04:57
- Why might an umbrella company fail to pay its total tax bill to HMRC? Aug 18 06:08
- Contractors, here are the late payment fixes that the Lords just turned down Aug 17 08:03
- How will HMRC's Direct Debit plan affect contractors paying VAT and PAYE? Aug 13 23:54
- HMRC's new 'reckless' tax offence: an IR35 game-changer for contractors? Aug 13 13:50
- “I’m not a Machiavellian overlord”: Adrian Sacco breaks his silence on the Contractor Loan Recalls Aug 13 06:50
- ‘Bounce back’ in IT contractor demand in July 2026, even if ‘one swallow doesn’t make a summer’ Aug 12 07:50

Leave a comment: