Originally posted by eek
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "LTD company for occasional freelance work. Is it going to cost more than I will earn"
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by eek View PostNope the fact it's fixed price trumps everything - as the financial risk is passed to the contractor - that's a clear outside verdict even on CEST
I agree, not sure I would bet my house on it being fixed price based on the information though. It might simply have been an estimate to provide the valuation against the limited company costs.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Manic View PostNot enough information to know. You all know simply having an SoW for adhoc work is not enough. The working practices are key here along with any direction and control.
Leave a comment:
-
I'd suggest a LTD. This is not umbrella land. Would need a separate umbrella contract for every piece of work. An umbrella could likely be more paperwork than a LTD rather than less.
I'd also suggest finding a local accountant to help rather than our usual suggestions.
And don't bother with VAT. All the accountant needs to handle is payroll and company returns so should costs less. If they want more than £1k then use on of the usual ones in the threads here.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by northernladuk View PostI know assumptions can be a dangerous thing but reading the OPs post what do you think it will be? Is he working like a disuised permie? Would the agency have offered LTD if it was inside?
Edited to say - NLUK, you are normally **** hot on stuff like this
Leave a comment:
-
Not enough information to know. You all know simply having an SoW for adhoc work is not enough. The working practices are key here along with any direction and control.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Manic View PostQuestion not asked yet which will have a big impact. Will the work fall inside IR35 legislation?
Leave a comment:
-
Question not asked yet which will have a big impact. Will the work fall inside IR35 legislation?
Leave a comment:
-
Back in the day we used to say that 30K was the threshold where using a LTD started to eclipse a brolly dependent on some factors. The expense policy changed so I'd expect that figure to change slightly but there hasn't been enough movement in taxation for this figure to be much different I don't think. So based on that I'd say deffo brolly.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by eek View PostIt's only a problem if you try to be clever - running your own accounts isn't much of a hassle using Freeagent (I know you don't use it). If all the OP needs is money coming in and out via dividends and they can avoid paying a salary there is little effort involved.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by ladymuck View PostAnd when the OP comes back to ask for help, I can imagine the ribbing they'll get...Last edited by eek; 17 December 2020, 09:37.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by ladymuck View PostUmbrellas don't tend to like sporadic work but it's worth describing the scenario to a couple and see what they say.
Will the agency run a payroll for you? Sounds like they won't or they'd be offering it.
I'd be hesitant to set up a LtdCo for this but that may end up being your only option.
And that's possible if you get a Mettle (Natwest) bank account as Freeagent is free with that and they now do the CT600 for you.
But you would need to keep things incredibly simple - which might be possible if you are doing this on top of another job (so taking the money via dividends rather than payroll).
If you are doing it as your sole income it's going to be a problem.
Leave a comment:
-
Umbrellas don't tend to like sporadic work but it's worth describing the scenario to a couple and see what they say.
Will the agency run a payroll for you? Sounds like they won't or they'd be offering it.
I'd be hesitant to set up a LtdCo for this but that may end up being your only option.
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Labour’s plan to regulate umbrella companies: a closer look Nov 21 09:24
- When HMRC misses an FTT deadline but still wins another CJRS case Nov 20 09:20
- How 15% employer NICs will sting the umbrella company market Nov 19 09:16
- Contracting Awards 2024 hails 19 firms as best of the best Nov 18 09:13
- How to answer at interview, ‘What’s your greatest weakness?’ Nov 14 09:59
- Business Asset Disposal Relief changes in April 2025: Q&A Nov 13 09:37
- How debt transfer rules will hit umbrella companies in 2026 Nov 12 09:28
- IT contractor demand floundering despite Autumn Budget 2024 Nov 11 09:30
- An IR35 bill of £19m for National Resources Wales may be just the tip of its iceberg Nov 7 09:20
- Micro-entity accounts: Overview, and how to file with HMRC Nov 6 09:27
Leave a comment: