Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
This change won't get backdated, ISTR that was in the original announcement
If I understand it correctly, big if there, it can only be backdated if the new rules are a result of a review of existing legislation and not brought about as a result of new legislation.
The managed service companies that Gordo referrs to have largely ignored IR35, some dont do contract reviews or even bother to ask, they just put all contractors irrelevant of level/job etc, into a minimum wage and dividend product. Composite companies are the biggest culprits. This is what gordo has the problem with. If everyone who was caught by IR35 since 2000 had paid the correct tax then we probably wouldnt be even talking about this new tax law!!!
However, step outside IT and there are a lot of engineers, surveyors, locums, architects, temp medical staff and a pile of other professionals working through MSCs who have never had the umbrella/OwnCo option. They are the ones you need to talk to... but you will probably find they know nothing about it.
im one of those engineers he mentions. A Highways engineer to be percise.
I use to have a brolly but i've gone to my own ltd co
Yes, but it's not about IR35, it's about people setting up artificial arrangements to avoid tax. While we know avoidance is perfectly legal, Gorgon does not like people taking the michael out of the system and has devised a way to stop it without tramping on the existing Limnited Company structure.
Despite the marketing hype, it is clearly not in the spirit of the law to take a 20% reduction in gross tax paid merely by asking someone else to set up a pretend company in which you have no interest. That is the HMG argument, and that is why the course they have taken is so punitive.
Overall for me I was actually better off with a limited than the MSC, % retained in limited is about 69% through the MSC it was about 67%. I agree alot did abuse the set up in that for their working arrangements would of meant 100% PAYE through a ltd. If it comes to it I will give them the money back and include a nice close up of my ass
Long and short of it for me is I agree that should stamp them out, its the back dating of tax Im not to comftable with (if they do it). Im lucky I can pay what I owe, but alot of people wont be able to. Yeah Im just p*ssed it might cost me, even though I didnt think I was doing anything wrong.
Agreed to a point, but I also feel MSC themselves are somewhat to blame, in the way they sold the schemes. I dont believe its fair to say also all users of the schemes would of been inside IR35 had they not used them, alot would of been outside, just because they wanted to pay someone else to do the paper work for them doesnt mean they werent in business for themselves. And for the record I never claimed dispensation etc
Yes, but it's not about IR35, it's about people setting up artificial arrangements to avoid tax. While we know avoidance is perfectly legal, Gorgon does not like people taking the michael out of the system and has devised a way to stop it without tramping on the existing Limnited Company structure.
Despite the marketing hype, it is clearly not in the spirit of the law to take a 20% reduction in gross tax paid merely by asking someone else to set up a pretend company in which you have no interest. That is the HMG argument, and that is why the course they have taken is so punitive.
Depends who you talk to, but from an IT perspective...
Us LtdCo people are laughing our socks off at all those who have ignored our advice, we believe that genuine brolly users are unaffected, and we think that MSC users who are merely trying to skim taxation are getting what they deserve - they pretend to be freelance but take none of the responsibililties so why should they get the tax breaks?
MSC users will see it as an unparalleled attack on their freedom and yet another stealth tax by taking away the God-given rights to expenses and divis because they really are in business on their own account and just want to outsource all the hard bits, like banking.
Brolly users won't understand what all the fuss is about
However, step outside IT and there are a lot of engineers, surveyors, locums, architects, temp medical staff and a pile of other professionals working through MSCs who have never had the umbrella/OwnCo option. They are the ones you need to talk to... but you will probably find they know nothing about it.
Agreed to a point, but I also feel MSC themselves are somewhat to blame, in the way they sold the schemes. I dont believe its fair to say also all users of the schemes would of been inside IR35 had they not used them, alot would of been outside, just because they wanted to pay someone else to do the paper work for them doesnt mean they werent in business for themselves. And for the record I never claimed dispensation etc
I agree with malvolio, except to add that it isn't just 'other professions' that have jumped (been pushed) onto the MSC bandwaggon, but blue collar workers onm 7-10 quid ph as well.
This latter group should really be working agency PAYE (with the agency picking up the payroll costs) like they always used to.
Depends who you talk to, but from an IT perspective...
Us LtdCo people are laughing our socks off at all those who have ignored our advice, we believe that genuine brolly users are unaffected, and we think that MSC users who are merely trying to skim taxation are getting what they deserve - they pretend to be freelance but take none of the responsibililties so why should they get the tax breaks?
MSC users will see it as an unparalleled attack on their freedom and yet another stealth tax by taking away the God-given rights to expenses and divis because they really are in business on their own account and just want to outsource all the hard bits, like banking.
Brolly users won't understand what all the fuss is about
However, step outside IT and there are a lot of engineers, surveyors, locums, architects, temp medical staff and a pile of other professionals working through MSCs who have never had the umbrella/OwnCo option. They are the ones you need to talk to... but you will probably find they know nothing about it.
I'm a journalist working on an article about the taxation changes for contractors using managed services companies. I'd like to get some opinions on what UK IT contractors think of the changes and how you'll be dealing with them -- by switching to an umbrella or to a limited company or another alternative.
My deadline's this afternoon, so if you're willing to speak to me, drop me a line.
Thanks
Last edited by nicolekobie; 19 January 2007, 17:36.
Leave a comment: