• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Can you avoid CGT on a second home by not letting it out?"

Collapse

  • BrilloPad
    replied
    Originally posted by FrontEnder View Post
    Even if it was possible, it seems pointless to lose out on rent to avoid paying tax.
    If it were possible, it might be worthwhile. CGT is calculated from when you bought the property. So in her case 1992. House prices increased exponentially since then. A shame its not the house price from when she moved out.

    Originally posted by WordIsBond View Post
    Q: I have a friend who has some talent, but is not using it to work. To avoid VAT. Is there any truth in this?
    A: Yes, actually. Since he doesn't work, he has no money, so buys less stuff, so doesn't pay much VAT. A brilliant move on his part, and HMRC can't do a thing about it.
    Not a good comparison.

    Leave a comment:


  • Troll
    replied
    Originally posted by Chart Accountancy View Post
    The property will be included in the parent's death estate at market value, so that acquired at death at the market value. .
    Slightly more complex than that as at first parents death in 1996 1/2 was transferred to the children

    Originally posted by Chart Accountancy View Post
    This will be your main residence so that it will be covered by the PRR so no CGT if you lived there until your parent died
    .
    No I left home in the 1980's and bought own property

    Originally posted by Chart Accountancy View Post
    . However the second property will not be covered. When you purchase your second property, you can make election for it to be treated as your main property, in this case the first property will not be covered by the PRR when sold.
    OK but my current house is my main residence

    Originally posted by Chart Accountancy View Post
    If you left the property and lived in your own when you inherited the property from your parents,then this will be subject to CGT as when acquired it will be your second property and not your main residence.
    That's the bit I'm trying to work out the CGT on - so it will be based on the Market value at time of first parent death (1996) when 50% was transferred to the children and time of sale plus? value of second parents 50% between his purchase in 1965 and death? or is his 50% not applicable for CGT?

    Leave a comment:


  • WordIsBond
    replied
    Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post
    I have a friend(!) who has a second home, however is not letting it out. To avoid CGT. Is there any truth in this?
    Q: I have a friend who has some talent, but is not using it to work. To avoid VAT. Is there any truth in this?
    A: Yes, actually. Since he doesn't work, he has no money, so buys less stuff, so doesn't pay much VAT. A brilliant move on his part, and HMRC can't do a thing about it.

    Leave a comment:


  • Chart Accountancy
    replied
    Originally posted by Troll View Post
    So what happens in the case where you part inherit with siblings the ancestral mansion - you lived there until the early 80's bought your own property in the interim and now just want to sell after the last parent has passed & it's never been rented
    Do you calculate the CGT - from when you left home or from when the parents bought the property?
    The property will be included in the parent's death estate at market value, so that acquired at death at the market value. This will be your main residence so that it will be covered by the PRR so no CGT if you lived there until your parent died. However the second property will not be covered. When you purchase your second property, you can make election for it to be treated as your main property, in this case the first property will not be covered by the PRR when sold. If you left the property and lived in your own when you inherited the property from your parents,then this will be subject to CGT as when acquired it will be your second property and not your main residence.
    Last edited by Chart Accountancy; 12 April 2017, 14:59.

    Leave a comment:


  • northernladuk
    replied
    You lived in your parents house. Isnt that completely different to it being yours?

    Leave a comment:


  • Troll
    replied
    Originally posted by Chart Accountancy View Post
    The private residence relief only applies for the years you lived in the house plus the last 18 months of ownership even if you didn't live there. Therefore, even if the second home is switched and it is now the main residence, the relief will be restricted to the number of years lived in the property so that there will be a gain which can be reduced by PRR based on the number of years lived in the property.
    So what happens in the case where you part inherit with siblings the ancestral mansion - you lived there until the early 80's bought your own property in the interim and now just want to sell after the last parent has passed & it's never been rented
    Do you calculate the CGT - from when you left home or from when the parents bought the property?

    Leave a comment:


  • Lance
    replied
    Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post
    I have a friend(!) who has a second home, however is not letting it out. To avoid CGT. Is there any truth in this?
    Nope.

    Leave a comment:


  • Chart Accountancy
    replied
    Originally posted by kaiser78 View Post
    You can flip your second home with your first home to avoid paying CGT. This is how a large number of MPs were exposed in the expenses scandal a couple of years ago.

    And there is the CGT allowance band + other exemptions that help to zeroise any potential CGT in addition.
    The private residence relief only applies for the years you lived in the house plus the last 18 months of ownership even if you didn't live there. Therefore, even if the second home is switched and it is now the main residence, the relief will be restricted to the number of years lived in the property so that there will be a gain which can be reduced by PRR based on the number of years lived in the property.

    There is also a letting relief that can be claimed, if you lived in the property during the period of ownership but it is again restricted to the number of years of being main residence (plus the last 18 months).The relief is the lower of £40,000 or the private residence relief available and restricted to the amount of the gain realised.

    Leave a comment:


  • Jessica@WhiteFieldTax
    replied
    Originally posted by FrontEnder View Post
    Even if it was possible, it seems pointless to lose out on rent to avoid paying tax.

    You're only paying CGT on the rise in value of the property when you sell it. You're missing out on thousands from rent every year.

    Maybe this would be viable if you bought a property that rocketed in price in a very short space of time.
    Correct. Tail wagging dog

    Leave a comment:


  • Jessica@WhiteFieldTax
    replied
    Originally posted by kaiser78 View Post
    You can flip your second home with your first home to avoid paying CGT. This is how a large number of MPs were exposed in the expenses scandal a couple of years ago.

    And there is the CGT allowance band + other exemptions that help to zeroise any potential CGT in addition.
    Correct. But those are mitigations rather than changing OPs friends basic inaccurate premise

    Leave a comment:


  • Jessica@WhiteFieldTax
    replied
    Originally posted by WTFH View Post
    What if you lived in one and your wife lived in the other?
    Not unless you are separated and can prove so. Otherwise one family home.

    Leave a comment:


  • Chart Accountancy
    replied
    Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post
    I have a friend(!) who has a second home, however is not letting it out. To avoid CGT. Is there any truth in this?
    Not really, you can only have the principal private residence relief on your main residence. For the second home, if not owned jointly with a spouse, an interest to the spouse can be transferred so that both will use the CGT allowance i.e 2 X£11,300. When the acquisition costs and selling costs are added, the Capital Gain realised less the allowance can be reduced significantly. However, if you think even if some tax is paid, it is better to have a gain and pay some tax but gain overall on the sale of the property, but generally taxes will push the house prices up so that if possible, a higher selling price can be achieved to cover some of the CGT.

    Leave a comment:


  • kaiser78
    replied
    You can flip your second home with your first home to avoid paying CGT. This is how a large number of MPs were exposed in the expenses scandal a couple of years ago.

    And there is the CGT allowance band + other exemptions that help to zeroise any potential CGT in addition.

    Leave a comment:


  • FrontEnder
    replied
    Even if it was possible, it seems pointless to lose out on rent to avoid paying tax.

    You're only paying CGT on the rise in value of the property when you sell it. You're missing out on thousands from rent every year.

    Maybe this would be viable if you bought a property that rocketed in price in a very short space of time.

    Leave a comment:


  • WTFH
    replied
    What if you lived in one and your wife lived in the other?

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X