• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Reply to: Dividend Confusion

Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Dividend Confusion"

Collapse

  • ASB
    replied
    Originally posted by nato View Post
    Thanks everyone. I think there has just been a miscommunication between me and the accountant and I after your advice I now feel I am firmer ground to argue the point.

    I certainly do have dividend certificates so I shall put those together and forward them.
    For the first 8 months 100% pc of the dividend properly declared, minuted etc were yours. After that is was 66/34 for those subsequently declared.

    Knowing the exact timings and amounts would enable a calculation to be done.

    I suspect that tcp has hit the nail on the head.

    Knowing who produced the vouchers and whether they are in your physical possession could clear a lot up. (Your post suggests it is all done correctly).

    Often they seem to be discovered down the back of the sofa a bit after the event. Councidentally with the contemperaneous minutes.

    Edit: you never "take" dividends. The company votes them and pays them as it sees fit. It may well be that they are simply journalised to shareholders current accounts but that is the result of the process. Not the process.
    Last edited by ASB; 1 December 2016, 21:51.

    Leave a comment:


  • SueEllen
    replied
    Originally posted by nato View Post
    Thanks everyone. I think there has just been a miscommunication between me and the accountant and I after your advice I now feel I am firmer ground to argue the point.

    I certainly do have dividend certificates so I shall put those together and forward them.
    If you explained it like your original post I'm not surprised there is a miscommunication.

    Leave a comment:


  • nato
    replied
    Thanks everyone. I think there has just been a miscommunication between me and the accountant and I after your advice I now feel I am firmer ground to argue the point.

    I certainly do have dividend certificates so I shall put those together and forward them.

    Leave a comment:


  • DoobDude
    replied
    Another example of where having an accountant leads to more work, when all you have is a simple contracting limited company.

    Self assessment, the clue is in the wording. Do it yourself.

    Leave a comment:


  • TheCyclingProgrammer
    replied
    Is your accountant one of those that treats all interim payments as directors loans and then tidies it all up with one big dividend at the end of the year?

    Leave a comment:


  • Lance
    replied
    Originally posted by nato View Post
    The share split is 66/34 and has been applied as such.

    However the accountant has applied it to the total yearly dividend take and not just the dividends taken since my wife was appointed.
    send your accountant the dividend certificates that were issued after the company board met.
    You do have those don't you? If not then ask your accountant how to do them.

    Leave a comment:


  • malvolio
    replied
    Originally posted by nato View Post
    The share split is 66/34 and has been applied as such.

    However the accountant has applied it to the total yearly dividend take and not just the dividends taken since my wife was appointed.
    So tell your accountant how much money has been issued to and your wife as dividend income. How it is derived is irrelevant.

    Leave a comment:


  • Scruff
    replied
    Your Accountant is the person to ask. They should be split according to the dates of the Dividends' declaration, as per the minutes of the Meetings.

    Leave a comment:


  • nato
    replied
    The share split is 66/34 and has been applied as such.

    However the accountant has applied it to the total yearly dividend take and not just the dividends taken since my wife was appointed.

    Leave a comment:


  • SueEllen
    replied
    Your post doesn't make sense.

    What is the shareholding split between you and your wife in percentages?

    What is the shareholding split the accountant declared in percentages?

    If you cannot explain it to us on a forum (which includes accountants) then there is no way your accountant understands what you have done.

    Leave a comment:


  • nato
    started a topic Dividend Confusion

    Dividend Confusion

    I'll get straight to the point.

    Started the ltd co last year and ran for 8 months as sole director (business started 2 months after co. opening) taking dividends as necessary.
    At Christmas I brought on my wife as a director with a relative share ratio and then split the following dividends as such.
    However I have now received both mine and my wife's Self Assessments from the accountant and they have taken the company's total dividends and split as the share ratio above.
    This means my wife will be declaring more shares than she has actually had and I will be declaring less.

    I appreciate that from a pure tax income this won't make a difference to HMRC but to my simple logic why wouldn't we just declare the dividend payments exactly as they were made as this won't take me or my wife into higher tax brackets?

    Hopefully all that makes sense but having asked the accountant a few times about why they have done it this way I can't seem to make sense of it so any help is welcome as this is my first year of operating and I want to make sure the t's and i's are sorted.

    Thanks in advance.
Working...
X