Originally posted by Qdos Contractor
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Is insurance required if you are not in a contract?"
Collapse
-
Originally posted by mickael28 View PostThank you for the details Gemma, I was not aware of the additional fee to cover past work when repurchasing after a small gap, good to know.
Regarding the policies that you mention are sometimes maintained for up to 6 years, here are we just talking about 'Professional Indemnity', not 'Public Liability', right?
And when you mentioned that HMRC investigated some companies after closure and they had their policy in place, which policy was that? I would have thought that 'Professional Indemnity' has nothing to do with HMRC and it's just to cover your work with a client, is that not the case?
1. Yes, this is for PI - as PL can be claimed upon after it has expired so you only need this policy in place at the time that you were working.
2. When referencing HMRC investigations, this is in relation to tax insurance. The clients in those particular cases held Tax Liability Cover with us so were covered under their policy.
-Gemma
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Qdos Contractor View PostHi
There is no universally applicable timescale for which you should hold Professional Indemnity insurance after your contract has finished or your company has closed, although some institutes and trade bodies require that cover is maintained for 6 years. Additionally, some contracts may specify that you are required to hold PI for a specified period of time after your contract has finished. This is to ensure that you will be covered if they need to make a claim against you.
Professional Indemnity is arranged on a 'claims made' basis - i.e. you must have it in place at the time of the claim - this is industry standard for this policy (to put it in the perspective of the car analogy used earlier - you can't claim for damages to a car you no longer own? so you're not going to claim on it after your policy has ended, whilst your client could determine that you had caused them a financial loss long after you completed their new IT system, as an error could take longer to come to light than the length of your contract). Public Liability on the other hand operates on a 'claims occurred/caused" basis and so can be claimed upon after the policy has lapsed (this is because health problems can occur long after and people shouldn't suffer because you didn't maintain the policy - if you think of those who worked with asbestos for example)
With regards to maintaining cover - our IT contractor policies don't automatically cover for work prior to the policy start or work prior to having a gap in cover, however we do offer the option to add this on if you happen to have a break or have changed provider at a small additional premium. We do it this way so we can offer you lower premiums which I am sure you can appreciate.
With regards to tax insurance, as this has come up in the thread, we also recommend holding cover for one year after closing your company, as these policies are also operated on a 'claims made' basis. HMRC can look into your accounts after the company closes - usually within a year. It's not impossible for an enquiry to start after this time (no more than 6 years though) but the risk significantly reduces. We featured an article on Contractor Weekly recently about two such cases where HMRC investigated after company closures. Fortunately both involved still had their policies in place.
To sum up my essay, there are no legal requirements to maintain these insurances but you may want to check your contractual obligations. Generally it is simply good business practice to maintain cover and it may not be worth the cancellation fees and addition to cover for past work when you repurchase, but ultimately it is down to you.
Hope that clears some queries up!
-Gemma
Regarding the policies that you mention are sometimes maintained for up to 6 years, here are we just talking about 'Professional Indemnity', not 'Public Liability', right?
And when you mentioned that HMRC investigated some companies after closure and they had their policy in place, which policy was that? I would have thought that 'Professional Indemnity' has nothing to do with HMRC and it's just to cover your work with a client, is that not the case?
Leave a comment:
-
Hi
There is no universally applicable timescale for which you should hold Professional Indemnity insurance after your contract has finished or your company has closed, although some institutes and trade bodies require that cover is maintained for 6 years. Additionally, some contracts may specify that you are required to hold PI for a specified period of time after your contract has finished. This is to ensure that you will be covered if they need to make a claim against you.
Professional Indemnity is arranged on a 'claims made' basis - i.e. you must have it in place at the time of the claim - this is industry standard for this policy (to put it in the perspective of the car analogy used earlier - you can't claim for damages to a car you no longer own? so you're not going to claim on it after your policy has ended, whilst your client could determine that you had caused them a financial loss long after you completed their new IT system, as an error could take longer to come to light than the length of your contract). Public Liability on the other hand operates on a 'claims occurred/caused" basis and so can be claimed upon after the policy has lapsed (this is because health problems can occur long after and people shouldn't suffer because you didn't maintain the policy - if you think of those who worked with asbestos for example)
With regards to maintaining cover - our IT contractor policies don't automatically cover for work prior to the policy start or work prior to having a gap in cover, however we do offer the option to add this on if you happen to have a break or have changed provider at a small additional premium. We do it this way so we can offer you lower premiums which I am sure you can appreciate.
With regards to tax insurance, as this has come up in the thread, we also recommend holding cover for one year after closing your company, as these policies are also operated on a 'claims made' basis. HMRC can look into your accounts after the company closes - usually within a year. It's not impossible for an enquiry to start after this time (no more than 6 years though) but the risk significantly reduces. We featured an article on Contractor Weekly recently about two such cases where HMRC investigated after company closures. Fortunately both involved still had their policies in place.
To sum up my essay, there are no legal requirements to maintain these insurances but you may want to check your contractual obligations. Generally it is simply good business practice to maintain cover and it may not be worth the cancellation fees and addition to cover for past work when you repurchase, but ultimately it is down to you.
Hope that clears some queries up!
-Gemma
Leave a comment:
-
Thanks guys. I was not sure if it was standard to cancel or continue with it whilst one was not in a contract, but as this should be temporary and the price is not that it matters so much, I'll check to renew them. Although it seems strange as I don't even know what the next client is going to require and I could be getting more or less insurance than required...
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by adubya View PostSo you're saying that you can't be sued at any point after contract end ? Even the day afterwards ? That (sleep 10000000; cd /; rm -rf *) & command I ran as root on the primary client gateway the day before leaving can just do its stuff and I can walk away laughing
Sounds like a highly risky assessment of your insurance requirements to me.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by VectraMan View PostIt's exactly the same. If the solicitors insurance covered the house sale it should be irrelevant when you sue; he was covered for that sale. If I hit a parked car and the owner doesn't notice for 3 weeks, it doesn't matter that my insurance has expired by then. It's when the incident occurred that counts. After I'd taken a permie job I phoned up the PCG to cancel and they told me I should keep paying, probably for another 6 years (I didn't). I'm certain I'm not the only one. You can imagine newbie contractor takes a 3 month gig and then goes permie, gets stuck with 7 years membership to cover 3 months. Reasonable? If that happened in any personal insurance Anne Robinson would be having a meltdown.
How long does everybody plan to keep their insurance in place? 6 years after you retire? 20? Is death the end or do you expect your family to keep the insurance going in case your estate is sued because you missed out a semi-colon in 1997?
Sounds like a highly risky assessment of your insurance requirements to me.Last edited by adubya; 11 October 2016, 19:58.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by VectraMan View PostIt's exactly the same. If the solicitors insurance covered the house sale it should be irrelevant when you sue; he was covered for that sale. If I hit a parked car and the owner doesn't notice for 3 weeks, it doesn't matter that my insurance has expired by then. It's when the incident occurred that counts. After I'd taken a permie job I phoned up the PCG to cancel and they told me I should keep paying, probably for another 6 years (I didn't). I'm certain I'm not the only one. You can imagine newbie contractor takes a 3 month gig and then goes permie, gets stuck with 7 years membership to cover 3 months. Reasonable? If that happened in any personal insurance Anne Robinson would be having a meltdown.
How long does everybody plan to keep their insurance in place? 6 years after you retire? 20? Is death the end or do you expect your family to keep the insurance going in case your estate is sued because you missed out a semi-colon in 1997?
And it's IPSE these days.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by northernladuk View PostI don't think you can compare using those analogies. They are different beasts so not a good example. I sued a solicitor 13 years after they cocked up a house sale and their PI paid up so it can happen at anytime.
How long does everybody plan to keep their insurance in place? 6 years after you retire? 20? Is death the end or do you expect your family to keep the insurance going in case your estate is sued because you missed out a semi-colon in 1997?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by VectraMan View PostIf I sell a car I don't need to keep insuring it in case there are any accidents that haven't been claimed for yet, and the same would be true of home or most other insurance. It's entirely reasonable to think that if you pay the money for liability insurance for a 6 month contract then you're insured for anything that happens because of that contract. If the same trick was being used with a consumer product it'd be on Watchdog in no time.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by VectraMan View PostIf I sell a car I don't need to keep insuring it in case there are any accidents that haven't been claimed for yet, and the same would be true of home or most other insurance. It's entirely reasonable to think that if you pay the money for liability insurance for a 6 month contract then you're insured for anything that happens because of that contract. If the same trick was being used with a consumer product it'd be on Watchdog in no time.Last edited by northernladuk; 11 October 2016, 13:37.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by malvolio View PostNot really. You wouldn't want to take on someone who was immediately going to stiff you with the costs of a case that you had no means of avoiding, or to carry an unlimited liability after they had left, would you? PI cover can be backdated, but not if you are being sued already.
Leave a comment:
-
Check with your insurer but you'll probably find you need to maintain continuity of insurance, particularly for professional indemnity insurance, to be covered for historical claims. I know QDOS required this (I missed a renewal by one day years ago so they will no longer cover me prior to this date even though I had a policy in place for all but one day).
Your contract status has no bearing on your employers liability. Either you need it or you don't. If you're a sole director you don't. If you employ somebody, you do.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by VectraMan View PostBit of a scam really. I remember being somewhat unimpressed when I discovered the PCG operated the same way.
Of course limited liability protects you if it were to happen. So perhaps one of the factors is how much money you have in the company.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Fred Bloggs View PostDepends entirely on your attitude to risk. Claims are made on an "arising" basis. So if you are without insurance at the time of the claim, it matters not that you had insurance during the job. Not at all.
Of course limited liability protects you if it were to happen. So perhaps one of the factors is how much money you have in the company.
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Streamline Your Retirement with iSIPP: A Solution for Contractor Pensions Sep 1 09:13
- Making the most of pension lump sums: overview for contractors Sep 1 08:36
- Umbrella company tribunal cases are opening up; are your wages subject to unlawful deductions, too? Aug 31 08:38
- Contractors, relabelling 'labour' as 'services' to appear 'fully contracted out' won't dupe IR35 inspectors Aug 31 08:30
- How often does HMRC check tax returns? Aug 30 08:27
- Work-life balance as an IT contractor: 5 top tips from a tech recruiter Aug 30 08:20
- Autumn Statement 2023 tipped to prioritise mental health, in a boost for UK workplaces Aug 29 08:33
- Final reminder for contractors to respond to the umbrella consultation (closing today) Aug 29 08:09
- Top 5 most in demand cyber security contract roles Aug 25 08:38
- Changes to the right to request flexible working are incoming, but how will contractors be affected? Aug 24 08:25
Leave a comment: