• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Problematic flights to conference and expenses"

Collapse

  • Old Greg
    replied
    Originally posted by northernladuk View Post
    Which one.. or is that a non question?
    Schrödinger's Darren.

    Leave a comment:


  • northernladuk
    replied
    Originally posted by Old Greg View Post
    He used Darren as his travel agent.
    Which one.. or is that a non question?

    Leave a comment:


  • Old Greg
    replied
    Originally posted by Batcher View Post
    Did he go on the trip? Has he been investigated by HMRC?

    I hate stories with crap endings!
    He used Darren as his travel agent.

    Leave a comment:


  • Batcher
    replied
    Did he go on the trip? Has he been investigated by HMRC?

    I hate stories with crap endings!

    Leave a comment:


  • northernladuk
    replied
    Originally posted by Old Greg View Post
    Glad that's been put to bed.
    Originally posted by Darren at Fox-Bartfield View Post
    No
    The gentleman doth protesteh too much. Smells fishy.

    Leave a comment:


  • Old Greg
    replied
    Originally posted by BillHicksRIP View Post
    Just checking, you're not Darren Upton, are you?
    Originally posted by Darren at Fox-Bartfield View Post
    No
    Glad that's been put to bed.

    Leave a comment:


  • Darren at Fox-Bartfield
    replied
    Accountant

    No

    Leave a comment:


  • BillHicksRIP
    replied
    Originally posted by Darren at DynamoAccounts View Post
    We did a newsletter article on training costs a couple of months ago (link) that may be of interest following a tribunal case.
    Just checking, you're not Darren Upton, are you?

    Leave a comment:


  • Pondlife
    replied
    What you, as director, spend company money on and what yourco can offset against corp tax can be different things entirely. And whether either of those first two constitute a BIK to yourself is another matter again.

    Leave a comment:


  • MrMarkyMark
    replied
    Originally posted by concord View Post
    Thanks for posting that link.

    The company is paying for the conference but the article seems to be talking about a deduction on a personal tax return? Also, while the conference is putting on a day of training, I didn't purchase that.

    As I said, I'm the director and I've determined this is in best interest of the company. No issues with finances.
    There's the answer you were looking for, go for it

    Leave a comment:


  • concord
    replied
    Thanks for posting that link.

    The company is paying for the conference but the article seems to be talking about a deduction on a personal tax return? Also, while the conference is putting on a day of training, I didn't purchase that.

    As I said, I'm the director and I've determined this is in best interest of the company. No issues with finances.

    Leave a comment:


  • Lance
    replied
    Originally posted by concord View Post

    More important is this document someone posted above: https://www.gov.uk/hmrc-internal-man...anual/eim31960

    I always thought conferences were fine but according to that page "it needs to be demonstrated that attendance was necessary to carry out the duties of the employment of the person attending."
    Have a board meeting and mandate an employee to go.

    Leave a comment:


  • Darren at Fox-Bartfield
    replied
    Training Costs

    Originally posted by concord View Post
    https://www.gov.uk/hmrc-internal-man...nual/eim31960: "Expenditure incurred by an employee to improve his or her qualifications for doing the job, or to keep his or her knowledge up to date, are not deductible"

    https://www.gov.uk/hmrc-internal-man...nual/eim31990: "The neurologist’s employer encourages her to attend and the conference is directly relevant to her work. ... No deduction can be permitted for the cost of attending the conference. Attendance at the conference is not necessary expenditure"

    To be honest, I'm not 100% what those documents are. They are marked "internal". The way I see it is that I'm the director and I decide what the duties are, and they are in line with what promotes the long term success of the business.
    We did a newsletter article on training costs a couple of months ago (link) that may be of interest following a tribunal case.

    Leave a comment:


  • concord
    replied
    I'm not anticipating any issues but those documents are interesting.

    https://www.gov.uk/hmrc-internal-man...nual/eim31960: "Expenditure incurred by an employee to improve his or her qualifications for doing the job, or to keep his or her knowledge up to date, are not deductible"

    https://www.gov.uk/hmrc-internal-man...nual/eim31990: "The neurologist’s employer encourages her to attend and the conference is directly relevant to her work. ... No deduction can be permitted for the cost of attending the conference. Attendance at the conference is not necessary expenditure"

    To be honest, I'm not 100% what those documents are. They are marked "internal". The way I see it is that I'm the director and I decide what the duties are, and they are in line with what promotes the long term success of the business.
    Last edited by concord; 19 August 2016, 08:35.

    Leave a comment:


  • Yorkie62
    replied
    [QUOTE=concord;2300370]

    More important is this document someone posted above: https://www.gov.uk/hmrc-internal-man...anual/eim31960

    I always thought conferences were fine but according to that page "it needs to be demonstrated that attendance was necessary to carry out the duties of the employment of the person attending."
    /QUOTE]

    Personally I don't see what the problem with attending conferences is under these rules. As a systems engineering consultant and a member of INCOSE, and someone who has a seat on one of the INCOSE UK working groups I attend both conferences and working group meeting's as a business expense. It about keeping you skills upto date in the particular sector you work in and comes under the general umbrella of training.
    However I suspect that HMRC might take a differect view point if I were to try to claim attendance at the Adult Entertainment conference NLUK eluded too. Unless of course I could prove that my next gig might be in that industry sector.

    As long as it is pertanent to the sector you work in there should be no problems.

    Of course there has to be the usual caveats. Can your Ltd Co afford this as an expense, etc.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X