• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Contracting for a current permie employer always IR35 caught?"

Collapse

  • northernladuk
    replied
    Originally posted by Old Greg View Post
    When I started contracting I did a Friday to Monday, in that I joined a team of contractors who I had previously been working with as a permie secondee from a different organisation. So slightly different from the typical Friday to Monday scenario, and I was confident I was outside IR35.
    Yeah but you used to invoice in Guinea's for professional services back then.

    Leave a comment:


  • Old Greg
    replied
    When I started contracting I did a Friday to Monday, in that I joined a team of contractors who I had previously been working with as a permie secondee from a different organisation. So slightly different from the typical Friday to Monday scenario, and I was confident I was outside IR35.

    Leave a comment:


  • missinggreenfields
    replied
    I'd take professional employment advice if I was in his shoes - how can he be made redundant if there is work at the company for him to do?

    If he's not genuinely redundant (and it doesn't sound like he is) then the tax treatment of his redundancy pay is very different and he'll need to declare the income or hope that he doesn't get caught.

    Leave a comment:


  • DallasDad
    replied
    I had a 12 month no returning to HP clause in my severance package and that included returning as a contractor
    So that is the first thing said PM should investigate.

    Leave a comment:


  • SueEllen
    replied
    Originally posted by b0redom View Post
    Thanks guys, as I expected, probably not worth risking declaring outside IR35 especially given he'll likely get a huge payrise from being a permie anyway.
    Very risky for the company.

    In theory he could sue them for constructive dismissal or discrimination as there is a position in the company he has the skills to do.

    When your position is made redundant the company has to check there isn't a role you have the skills to do, and it doesn't have to be the same position.

    I know some larger companies refuse to engage ex-employers for anything from 6 to 12 months even if the employee resigns to ensure they can't be sued.

    Leave a comment:


  • LondonManc
    replied
    Originally posted by northernladuk View Post
    Where this might be true I'd say being in the back foot is a massive understatement and even with all the things mentioned in the last paragraph solidly in place the one risk you can't sign away is the ex employee continuing to act like one and make himself part and parcel. Personally I'd start if with the thinking you're definitely inside and attempt to work up from that.
    Unfortunate but true. They'll be treated as part and parcel so may as well slap an extra £50 on their day rate to cover expenses and tax.

    Leave a comment:


  • northernladuk
    replied
    Originally posted by TheCyclingProgrammer View Post
    Not always IMO, but you're starting off on the back foot with regards to showing you're not part or parcel of the organisation and not treated like any other employee.

    However if the role is different and the contract has tight scope then treat it like any other role. Contract review, working practices etc.
    Where this might be true I'd say being in the back foot is a massive understatement and even with all the things mentioned in the last paragraph solidly in place the one risk you can't sign away is the ex employee continuing to act like one and make himself part and parcel. Personally I'd start if with the thinking you're definitely inside and attempt to work up from that.

    Leave a comment:


  • b0redom
    replied
    Thanks guys, as I expected, probably not worth risking declaring outside IR35 especially given he'll likely get a huge payrise from being a permie anyway.

    Leave a comment:


  • LondonManc
    replied
    As TCP says, they'll have to be ultra-careful on IR35 because it's the Friday to Monday contractors that it was put in place for. There's nothing wrong with being inside IR35, though, because it's only one contract.

    Leave a comment:


  • TheCyclingProgrammer
    replied
    Not always IMO, but you're starting off on the back foot with regards to showing you're not part or parcel of the organisation and not treated like any other employee.

    However if the role is different and the contract has tight scope then treat it like any other role. Contract review, working practices etc.

    Leave a comment:


  • Contracting for a current permie employer always IR35 caught?

    Hi,
    At the place I'm contracting, one of the permies has been made redundant. He's a PM and it's likely that another account in a different part of the business may have a contract role for a PM come up shortly after he leaves.

    Is it always the case that people leaving a company, and then rejoining shortly afterwards are IR35 caught, even if their position is made redundant? If their position is redundant and then they come back to do a different job as long as the right clauses are there, I don't see how they would automatically be caught?

    Regards...

    b0redom
Working...
X