• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Buy to Let situation is sad"

Collapse

  • SueEllen
    replied
    Originally posted by Fred Bloggs View Post
    Switzerland is (rightly) picky who it lets in. Nobody goes their and gets free housing, dental, medical, education and income given out free of charge. Why do you think all those immigrants gather at Calais and not the Swiss border?
    If you watched any of the recent refugee programs the only ones who want to come here are the thicker ones.

    The ones with fluent English, degrees and skills in something useful want to go to another European country.

    So I suspect it's not the free housing, healthcare etc that is drawing them but the fact they are told you can get a job in the UK with few skills and the police will not hassle you all the time.

    Leave a comment:


  • Fred Bloggs
    replied
    Switzerland is (rightly) picky who it lets in. Nobody goes their and gets free housing, dental, medical, education and income given out free of charge. Why do you think all those immigrants gather at Calais and not the Swiss border?

    Leave a comment:


  • Einstein Jnr
    replied
    Switzerland has a population made up 25% of immigrants. UK is what, 12%?


    Correlation between number of immigrants and house prices? Number of immigrants in London is heading to 50% as average house prices have rocketed to over 520K. Compared with the rest of the country which has a much lower immigration density and much lower house prices.

    Leave a comment:


  • BrilloPad
    replied
    Originally posted by NotAllThere View Post
    The UK is in a mess because of the banks.


    Nothing to do with the morons who run the country then.....

    Leave a comment:


  • garnet
    replied
    May be not so sad situation. Look into liferent (Scotland only?).

    Leave a comment:


  • NotAllThere
    replied
    Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post
    Switzerland, like Japan, does not have a huge immigrant influx.

    In particular, it does not have influx of immigrants who are crims.
    Switzerland has a population made up 25% of immigrants. UK is what, 12%?
    Switzerland has accepted a higher number of refugees as a proportion of the total population than the average across Europe. The UK has accepted considerably fewer.
    Switzerland has low crime overall, but a disproportionate number of convictions are of immigrants.

    The main reason in the house price difference as quoted in the two currencies is the exchange rate.

    The Swiss franc strengthened greatly during the banking crisis as it was seen as a safe haven for investors. Switzerland was not so badly affected by the banking crisis, because, by and large, it does not have a credit economy. E.g. getting a mortgage isn't easy (you need 20% deposit, and interest payments must be less than 1/3 of your income at a notional interest rate of 5%). For BTL, you need 50% deposit.

    Nothing to do with immigrants, criminal or otherwise. The UK is in a mess because of the banks.

    Leave a comment:


  • northernladuk
    replied
    Originally posted by SlipTheJab View Post
    What could possibly go wrong
    Have to admit that was exactly my initial reaction as well but don't know enough about it.

    Leave a comment:


  • SlipTheJab
    replied
    Originally posted by NickNick View Post
    From the article:

    Fret not though, because there’s a solution via us and the largest provider of limited company buy-to-lets which allows the property to be owned by a wholly owned subsidiary of your contracting company. This not only allows contractors to benefit from the relief on mortgage interest, but also allows the deposit funds to be transferred in a manner which creates no further tax liability. In a nutshell, it reduces the costs of both funding and running the buy-to-let.
    What could possibly go wrong

    Leave a comment:


  • NickNick
    replied
    Originally posted by northernladuk View Post
    A what?
    From the article:

    Fret not though, because there’s a solution via us and the largest provider of limited company buy-to-lets which allows the property to be owned by a wholly owned subsidiary of your contracting company. This not only allows contractors to benefit from the relief on mortgage interest, but also allows the deposit funds to be transferred in a manner which creates no further tax liability. In a nutshell, it reduces the costs of both funding and running the buy-to-let.

    Leave a comment:


  • unixman
    replied
    Originally posted by foobar View Post
    The average Japanese who bought at the peak of the market in 1990 still has a house worth less than what they paid for it.
    I was referring to the UK market.

    Leave a comment:


  • northernladuk
    replied
    A what?

    Leave a comment:


  • KentDogWalker
    replied
    If anyone here has done a buy to let (via subsidiary company) I would like to talk to you)
    Last edited by KentDogWalker; 7 April 2016, 12:09.

    Leave a comment:


  • SueEllen
    replied
    Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post
    Switzerland, like Japan, does not have a huge immigrant influx.

    In particular, it does not have influx of immigrants who are crims.
    25% of Swiss residents are immigrants.

    And the fact that Japanese women tend not to want to have children explains why immigrants also don't want to move there.

    Leave a comment:


  • KentDogWalker
    replied
    Originally posted by unixman View Post
    Property will always be fine as long as you keep it for long enough - at least 5 to 10 years, say.

    I am one of the fools who has been saving for his whole life. Wish I had gone into BTL insted. Not for a quick profit, just long term security.

    At the moment, my savings allow me to be on the bench without drawing benefits I am entitled to, doing the gov a favour. Ok ok I still thing saving is good, but strewth.
    Yeah sounds good via the subsidiary approach, although I doubt you could transfer funds to the subsidiary to be invested in property as an expense (ie saving corp tax in the parent comany)?

    Leave a comment:


  • BrilloPad
    replied
    Originally posted by NotAllThere View Post
    There's never been regular extended fall in house prices in the UK. However, past performance is not an indication of future performance.

    In 1996, the average house price was about 500K CHF. Now it's about 400K CHF. See, it's happening already! Meanwhile my house was 450K GBP, and now it's about 800K GPB.

    I'd sell and move back, but the UK is cold and wet.
    Switzerland, like Japan, does not have a huge immigrant influx.

    In particular, it does not have influx of immigrants who are crims.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X