Originally posted by northernladuk
View Post
However the legislation is explicit and a majority of legitimate recruitment companies know that if push comes to shove they would struggle to defend a legal claim based on statute, irrespective of what the contract may state.
The problems arise when the status isn't clear from the outset, the relationship breaks down in some way or the agent (or end client) is dishonest. Simply staying opted in does not provide a guarantee of payment in these circumstances.
From a credit risk perspective remaining opted in is preferable, but it needs to be coupled with the necessary due diligence and adherence to any agreed contractual terms.

Leave a comment: