Originally posted by ba55meister
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Another HTMRC intermediary reporting question"
Collapse
-
Originally posted by TheCyclingProgrammer View PostI mentioned it to my current client out of mutual concern (I.e. This could be a PITA for both of us) and they weren't aware of it. They never came back to me with their own conclusions but they havent asked me for any of the reporting info so they aren't complying AFAIK.
I imagine outside of recruitment agencies, non compliance will be widespread.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by ba55meister View PostThe legislation states that every company that (a) has a contract with a client (b) provides more than one worker’s services to a client because of your contract with that client
So for example if a company (a digital agency or a software house) provides IT services to the end client and they hire clients directly or through recruitment agencies they still have to collect the data about contractors they hire and report to HMRC. Is that correct?
There was quite a bit of discussion on here on what actually constitutes as supplying a worker. If a client hires MyCo and I supply a sub-contracted substitute then it's reasonably clear that I would have to report that substitutes details to HMRC. But if I simply sub-contract an element of the work (e.g. some design work for a web project) but the designer only deals with me then it's not clear if that's reportable as I'm not really supplying them as a worker, they are simply supplying their services to MyCo.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by eek View PostNo, I think he is talking about the digital marketing companies who employ freelancers in various forms.
I doubt these regulations were advertised that well outside of recruitment agents but from memory as tcp says there were no exception written in the rules. If we employ a substitute and don't pay them by paye I'm sure we are supposed to report it
It's certainly not that well advertised outside of agencies I'm sure. I mentioned it to my current client out of mutual concern (I.e. This could be a PITA for both of us) and they weren't aware of it. They never came back to me with their own conclusions but they havent asked me for any of the reporting info so they aren't complying AFAIK.
I imagine outside of recruitment agencies, non compliance will be widespread.
Leave a comment:
-
The legislation states that every company that (a) has a contract with a client (b) provides more than one worker’s services to a client because of your contract with that client
So for example if a company (a digital agency or a software house) provides IT services to the end client and they hire clients directly or through recruitment agencies they still have to collect the data about contractors they hire and report to HMRC. Is that correct?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by darrylmg View PostIs the OP talking about those websites where you can hire a contractor and the site takes a % ?
I doubt these regulations were advertised that well outside of recruitment agents but from memory as tcp says there were no exception written in the rules. If we employ a substitute and don't pay them by paye I'm sure we are supposed to report it
Leave a comment:
-
What NLUK says but from what I remember, very likely a YES.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by ba55meister View PostDo digital agencies need to supply HMRC with the information on of contractors working for the agency?
Leave a comment:
-
Another HTMRC intermediary reporting question
Do digital agencies need to supply HMRC with the information on of contractors working for the agency?Tags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Streamline Your Retirement with iSIPP: A Solution for Contractor Pensions Sep 1 09:13
- Making the most of pension lump sums: overview for contractors Sep 1 08:36
- Umbrella company tribunal cases are opening up; are your wages subject to unlawful deductions, too? Aug 31 08:38
- Contractors, relabelling 'labour' as 'services' to appear 'fully contracted out' won't dupe IR35 inspectors Aug 31 08:30
- How often does HMRC check tax returns? Aug 30 08:27
- Work-life balance as an IT contractor: 5 top tips from a tech recruiter Aug 30 08:20
- Autumn Statement 2023 tipped to prioritise mental health, in a boost for UK workplaces Aug 29 08:33
- Final reminder for contractors to respond to the umbrella consultation (closing today) Aug 29 08:09
- Top 5 most in demand cyber security contract roles Aug 25 08:38
- Changes to the right to request flexible working are incoming, but how will contractors be affected? Aug 24 08:25
Leave a comment: