• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Reply to: Lambard Wealth

Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Lambard Wealth"

Collapse

  • cojak
    replied
    Originally posted by TykeMerc View Post
    I think you will have more than one dance partner too, anyone using a scheme deserves what they get, the very visible writing has been on the wall for a long time.

    Might be an idea if the mods altered the thread title to reflect the real name of the scam artists and the fact they're trying to hide behind the Lombard name.
    Good idea

    Leave a comment:


  • LondonManc
    replied
    Greed is inherent in humans.

    Margin = Revenue - Costs.


    If revenue is fixed for six months, attack costs:
    Travel more cheaply (off peak trains, coach, drive, etc.)
    Eat more cheaply ()
    Stay somewhere cheaper (rent a room rather than hotel stay for example)

    If it's sounding too good to be true, it usually is.

    Leave a comment:


  • No2politics
    replied
    If you want to take home a larger amount of money focus on increasing your daily rate. Also make sure u are taking advantage of all allowable things. Income split if u can.

    Leave a comment:


  • LisaContractorUmbrella
    replied
    Originally posted by DonkeyRhubarb View Post
    Absolutely.

    The other thing I expect promoters will do is not act as an "agent" and, instead, get users to file their own tax returns. It will be a nightmare for HMRC to detect scheme usage.
    I bet we will also see a number of new 'consultancies' emerging

    Leave a comment:


  • LisaContractorUmbrella
    replied
    Originally posted by TykeMerc View Post
    I think you will have more than one dance partner too, anyone using a scheme deserves what they get, the very visible writing has been on the wall for a long time.

    Might be an idea if the mods altered the thread title to reflect the real name of the scam artists and the fact they're trying to hide behind the Lombard name.
    I'm sure if we ask them nicely.......

    Leave a comment:


  • DonkeyRhubarb
    replied
    Originally posted by Fred Bloggs View Post
    Totally agree. Many of the schemes already state no need to declare DOTAS so if you put down a salary of say £20k on your tax return and pay PAYE on it, then put £80k or more through a scheme, aren't HMRC going to struggle to identify scheme users?
    Absolutely.

    The other thing I expect promoters will do is not act as an "agent" and, instead, get users to file their own tax returns.

    Basically, there won't be anything on the returns to flag scheme usage other than a lowish salary.
    Last edited by DonkeyRhubarb; 30 November 2015, 13:41.

    Leave a comment:


  • TykeMerc
    replied
    Originally posted by LisaContractorUmbrella View Post
    We can but hope and if it does I, for one, will be doing the I told you so dance
    I think you will have more than one dance partner too, anyone using a scheme deserves what they get, the very visible writing has been on the wall for a long time.

    Might be an idea if the mods altered the thread title to reflect the real name of the scam artists and the fact they're trying to hide behind the Lombard name.

    Leave a comment:


  • LisaContractorUmbrella
    replied
    Originally posted by DonkeyRhubarb View Post
    HMRC probably think they've addressed the scheme problem with APNs, FNs etc.

    And, initially, it will look like that because nothing will be disclosed/declared. DOTAS registrations have already dried up.

    It may come back to bite them on the bottom, though, if all they've done is drive it underground.
    We can but hope and if it does I, for one, will be doing the I told you so dance

    Leave a comment:


  • LisaContractorUmbrella
    replied
    Originally posted by NotAllThere View Post
    Love it

    Leave a comment:


  • Fred Bloggs
    replied
    Originally posted by DonkeyRhubarb View Post
    HMRC probably think they've addressed the scheme problem with APNs, FNs etc.

    And, initially, it will look like that because nothing will be disclosed/declared. DOTAS registrations have already dried up.

    It may come back to bite them on the bottom, though, if all they've done is drive it underground.
    Totally agree. Many of the schemes already state no need to declare DOTAS so if you put down a salary of say £20k on your tax return and pay PAYE on it, then put £80k or more through a scheme, aren't HMRC going to struggle to identify scheme users?

    Leave a comment:


  • LondonManc
    replied
    Originally posted by NotAllThere View Post
    Is there a "cretin being bent over and shafted by HMRC" emoticon?

    Leave a comment:


  • NotAllThere
    replied
    Originally posted by LisaContractorUmbrella View Post
    And would HMRC believe us when we said this would happen - would they hell You just know that we are going to see a new round of schemes which will purport to 'avoid' all the new legislation coming in - do we have a 'banging head against brick wall' emoticon??

    Leave a comment:


  • DonkeyRhubarb
    replied
    Originally posted by LisaContractorUmbrella View Post
    And would HMRC believe us when we said this would happen - would they hell You just know that we are going to see a new round of schemes which will purport to 'avoid' all the new legislation coming in - do we have a 'banging head against brick wall' emoticon??
    HMRC probably think they've addressed the scheme problem with APNs, FNs etc.

    And, initially, it will look like that because nothing will be disclosed/declared. DOTAS registrations have already dried up.

    It may come back to bite them on the bottom, though, if all they've done is drive it underground.
    Last edited by DonkeyRhubarb; 30 November 2015, 12:54.

    Leave a comment:


  • LisaContractorUmbrella
    replied
    Originally posted by DonkeyRhubarb View Post
    I expect many ̶s̶c̶a̶m̶ scheme promoters are rubbing their hands together with the latest onslaught on contractors.
    And would HMRC believe us when we said this would happen - would they hell You just know that we are going to see a new round of schemes which will purport to 'avoid' all the new legislation coming in - do we have a 'banging head against brick wall' emoticon??

    Leave a comment:


  • DonkeyRhubarb
    replied
    IR35, in 2001, created the initial market for these schemes.

    Son of IR35, next year, will spawn a whole new wave.

    I expect the latest incarnations will try to go under the radar - no DOTAS disclosure (to avoid APNs) and nothing declared on tax returns. They will sail very close to the wind ie. evasion.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X