Originally posted by psychocandy
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Estimated percentage of contrator gig adverts inside\outside IR35"
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by Qdos Consulting View PostWell, roughly 75% of the contracts we review fail first time around.
That doesn't mean that the contract is inside or outside, though - it just means that there is crap paperwork in place.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Qdos Consulting View PostWell, roughly 75% of the contracts we review fail first time around.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by northernladuk View PostAnd that's just the contracts. Hate you think how many of these fail in the actual working practices.
Does anyone seriously believe their substitution clauses are realistic.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Qdos Consulting View PostWell, roughly 75% of the contracts we review fail first time around.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Qdos Consulting View PostWell, roughly 75% of the contracts we review fail first time around.
Leave a comment:
-
Well, roughly 75% of the contracts we review fail first time around.
Leave a comment:
-
Estimated percentage of contrator gig adverts inside\outside IR35
I'm still learning about the contracting world so bear with me on this one.
Let's say you took 1000 adverts for typical 6month\12month IT contracts for IT infrastructure\SQL\SCCM\.NET stack and you asked a company like QDOS to do a full IR35 on the contracts.
For the more experienced contractors out there, or for those that get regular IR35 reviews by legal professionals - what percentage of these do you think would be advised by the legal professionals as inside IR35, and how many outside?
The reason I ask this is to get a feel if contracts out there are really diverse and could fall in either category, or if a majority all have similar traits - ie end clients will try to keep their contacts written outside IR35, or inside IR35.
Thanks
CTags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- New umbrella company JSL rules: a 2026 guide for contractors Yesterday 22:50
- Top 5 contractor compliance challenges, as 2025-26 nears Oct 3 08:53
- Joint and Several Liability ‘won’t retire HMRC's naughty list’ Oct 2 05:28
- What contractors can take from the Industria Umbrella Ltd case Sep 30 23:05
- Is ‘Open To Work’ on LinkedIn due an IR35 dropdown menu? Sep 30 05:57
- IR35: Control — updated for 2025-26 Sep 28 21:28
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 20:17
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 08:17
- ‘Subdued’ IT contractor jobs market took third tumble in a row in August Sep 25 08:07
- Are CVs medieval or just being misused? Sep 24 05:05
Leave a comment: