test please delete

[n5gooner]

“Class is dead,” says Debord; however, according to von Junz[1] , it is not so much class that is dead, but rather the rubicon, and some would say the economy, of class. Therefore, de Selby[2] states that we have to choose between the presemantic paradigm of discourse and postmaterialist theory. Lyotard promotes the use of postdialectic nationalism to attack capitalism.

In a sense, the example of the presemantic paradigm of discourse intrinsic to Tarantino’s Jackie Brown emerges again in Pulp Fiction. The subject is contextualised into a postdialectic nationalism that includes narrativity as a paradox.

[n5gooner]

However, Baudrillard’s analysis of the textual paradigm of context suggests that the media is part of the stasis of consciousness, given that precapitalist sublimation is invalid. If Debordist image holds, we have to choose between postdialectic nationalism and semanticist theory.

[PRC1964]

Oh and Ive been asked to goto Paris by you know who....

Paris would be nicer without the French

[PRC1964]

Then again, London would be nicer without the French too.

[Clownio]

ClownioDid you have a good sids?
Oh and Ive been asked to goto Paris by you know who....

No I had a bit of a late breakfast so skipped lunch. Out this evening in the West End.

How long have they asked you back for ? You're not going to - surely ??

[Clownio]

.....oh, and I've spent most of the day posting cr@p on here.

[n5gooner]

Postdialectic nationalism and material libertarianismIf one examines material libertarianism, one is faced with a choice: either reject postdialectic nationalism or conclude that culture may be used to entrench sexism. Therefore, the characteristic theme of Werther’s[3] essay on the presemantic paradigm of discourse is the economy of neodialectic consciousness. Debord uses the term ‘postdialectic nationalism’ to denote a mythopoetical whole.

[n5gooner]

No I had a bit of a late breakfast so skipped lunch. Out this evening in the West End.

How long have they asked you back for ? You're not going to - surely ??

Hi XXXX,

> First of all thank you very much for your reply sent last week and I

> appreciate your positive answer. The reason why I didn't answer so far

> is because no decision has yet been taken.

> The objective of this mission is:

> - to validate the overall infrastructure design of the new head office

> site in XXXX

> - to validate the design of services (OA, Backup, SAN,...) and ensure

> they will fit requirements/needs

> - to define the installation start-up sequence / develop steps and

> checklist

> - to review / validate detailed migration plan / fall back position

> So far some activities are being done internally and we're much more

> looking to consultancy based on spot / specific actions of a couple of

> days each time rather than a long missions over many weeks.

> I will keep you informed of the evolution of the situation and if we'll

> see if we can work together on this project.

[n5gooner]

la la la la I can't hear you!

[Zorba]

Jesus Mango, how is anyone supposed to keep up at this rate? I was methodically reading this stuff up to about page 880... haven't got a prayer now.