Morning all
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
test please delete
Collapse
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by BrilloPad View PostYou should be more worried if NAT thought you were not an idiot.…Maybe we ain’t that young anymoreComment
-
-
Originally posted by zeitghost View Post
I shall continue to delete my bigoted views until they're all gone and then NAT can go **** himself & the horse he rode in on.
You should take small pleasures in winding NAT up."You’re just a bad memory who doesn’t know when to go away" JRComment
-
Originally posted by WTFH View PostNAT doesn’t think you’re an idiot.
Sadly I was sworn to secrecy......Comment
-
Originally posted by PhiltheGreek View Post<-Royal
Just popped in to see if the issue was sorted.
Can we not come up with a way of really annoying admin until he sorts it? I am tagging every general thread with "****** killing General". I believe cleaning up rogue tags is very painful.
I suggest a general-non-****** forum. Anyone posting in there about ***** gets bans of 1 day, 2 days, 4 days, etcetc.Comment
-
Originally posted by BrilloPad View PostHe said Jehovah! Stone him!
Can we not come up with a way of really annoying admin until he sorts it? I am tagging every general thread with "****** killing General". I believe cleaning up rogue tags is very painful.
I suggest a general-non-****** forum. Anyone posting in there about ***** gets bans of 1 day, 2 days, 4 days, etcetc.
A solution was suggested that everyone who started a thread about it should be banned, or everyone that turned a thread (not about it) into one about it should also be banned, but then there would be very few threads left in General…Maybe we ain’t that young anymoreComment
-
Originally posted by WTFH View PostCleaning the tags is very painful.
A solution was suggested that everyone who started a thread about it should be banned, or everyone that turned a thread (not about it) into one about it should also be banned, but then there would be very few threads left in General
I believe you would get far more visitors to the new forum. A lot of people have left due to the childish insults.
To be clear, I admit to being as guilty or more guilty than most.....Comment
-
-
Originally posted by WTFH View PostCleaning the tags is very painful.
A solution was suggested that everyone who started a thread about it should be banned, or everyone that turned a thread (not about it) into one about it should also be banned, but then there would be very few threads left in General"You’re just a bad memory who doesn’t know when to go away" JRComment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Secondary NI threshold sinking to £5,000: a limited company director’s explainer Today 09:51
- Reeves sets Spring Statement 2025 for March 26th Yesterday 09:18
- Spot the hidden contractor Dec 20 10:43
- Accounting for Contractors Dec 19 15:30
- Chartered Accountants with MarchMutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants with March Mutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants Dec 19 15:05
- Unfairly barred from contracting? Petrofac just paid the price Dec 19 09:43
- An IR35 case law look back: contractor must-knows for 2025-26 Dec 18 09:30
- A contractor’s Autumn Budget financial review Dec 17 10:59
Comment