Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Just been contacted by Paige at IP-say wanting a "headshot" by the end of the day for the elections mailing. Gave Mr ms an excuse to get out all his expensive seldom-used photography kit. Stuck on some slap and got some piccies - waiting to see how they come out.
On my top half I'm wearing a blouse. On my bottom half (not in shot), stockings, suspenders, high-heels and crotchless panties. You reckon that'll get me some votes?
you trying to over excite Mr MS - do you have him well insured?
Good luck
Always forgive your enemies; nothing annoys them so much.
Indeed. A friend of mine has an ongoing IR35 investigation, which is being handled by the PCG/IPSE. HMRC started by sending several pages of questions, demanding all kinds of information under pain of terrible consequences. The expert dealing with her case got the info from her to answer the first question, then simply struck out all of the rest of them and sent them back to HMRC with the comment "None of this information is relevant to your investigation."
Indeed. A friend of mine has an ongoing IR35 investigation, which is being handled by the PCG/IPSE. HMRC started by sending several pages of questions, demanding all kinds of information under pain of terrible consequences. The expert dealing with her case got the info from her to answer the first question, then simply struck out all of the rest of them and sent them back to HMRC with the comment "None of this information is relevant to your investigation."
She's optimistic about the eventual outcome
Good stuff. The more people who join IPSE, the greater their influence to prevent nonsense like this in the first place. I'm not convinced by their current direction (which is why I'm standing) but I can see the logic behind it - and I still reckon we're a lot better off with them than if they did't exist.
Comment