Originally posted by mookiemoo
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
SDS direct from third party NOT client
Collapse
X
-
Not a defence but I suspect the use of gendered terminology is not because there is an assumption of a male behind this but more due the historic use of of 'he' to mean 'they' -
Agree, there's little or no risk. Don't walk, you're on the right track...Originally posted by mookiemoo View PostWhy? If I have an SDS prepared by QDOS and from the agency saying its outside, the risk is theirs not mine.
The answers are truthful - I'm not making up a work of fiction - so it would stand up in court anyway
If the client (foreign) and agency (UK) are in agreement, I dont see the risk.Comment
-
It's also convenience as English doesn't have a gender neutral word for a single third party person. (it's I did a, you did b, he/she did c, we did x, you (lot) did y, they did z).Originally posted by ladymuck View PostNot a defence but I suspect the use of gendered terminology is not because there is an assumption of a male behind this but more due the historic use of of 'he' to mean 'they'
He is also just easier to use on a site where probably 80% of the audience is male - and the only time the correct gender would be used was if I (or the poster) was talking about a poster (cojak, you, mudskipper, Halo Jones) who they knew were female.Last edited by eek; 5 March 2020, 19:07.merely at clientco for the entertainmentComment
-
To be fair you could be forgiven for getting it wrong..Originally posted by eek View Post(cojak, you, mudskipper, Halo Jones).
Edit.. See you all in a month
'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!!
Comment
-
I absolutely appreciate how fortunate I am that the client for this contract is actually having individual assessments done based on actual working practices in order to get an accurate SDS for each contract (when so many other clients are going ‘no PSC’ or blanket inside without proper assessment)Originally posted by CompoundOverload View PostOP - I'd take your chances with what you have and be thankful and think of others who might not be as fortunate as you (a client that has a bit of sense about them).
I was just worried that the end clients name isn’t on the actual SDS (why do all the work and then not put your name to it) and wanted opinions on whether the fact that the above process had been done, was enough of a defence (for me), if hector comes calling, in the absence of an SDS with the client’s name on
I think WordIsBond, you, and others have answered that for me Thank youComment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Andrew Griffith MP says Tories would reform IR35 Oct 7 00:41
- New umbrella company JSL rules: a 2026 guide for contractors Oct 5 22:50
- Top 5 contractor compliance challenges, as 2025-26 nears Oct 3 08:53
- Joint and Several Liability ‘won’t retire HMRC's naughty list’ Oct 2 05:28
- What contractors can take from the Industria Umbrella Ltd case Sep 30 23:05
- Is ‘Open To Work’ on LinkedIn due an IR35 dropdown menu? Sep 30 05:57
- IR35: Control — updated for 2025-26 Sep 28 21:28
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 20:17
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 08:17
- ‘Subdued’ IT contractor jobs market took third tumble in a row in August Sep 25 08:07

Comment