Originally posted by northernladuk
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Are MSP also considered inside?
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
-
Originally posted by PeterSim View PostWhat do you do for a living you sound like a right ****.'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!!Comment
-
Originally posted by PeterSim View PostObviously I know that IR35 doesn't apply to permanent employees. You are confusing matters.
The question is whether permanent staff of consultancies (or is I call them MSP/PSC) contracted out to clients on fixed term contracts will be included in the IR35 audit done so by clients. I can't make it any clearer.
What you are describing doesn't make sense to me. Your description is that a person is employed twice for the same piece of work, once by you and once by the client.
If that's the case, then the person is doubly not affected by IR35."I can put any old tat in my sig, put quotes around it and attribute to someone of whom I've heard, to make it sound true."
- Voltaire/Benjamin Franklin/Anne Frank...Comment
-
Originally posted by PeterSim View PostObviously I know that IR35 doesn't apply to permanent employees. You are confusing matters.
The question is whether permanent staff of consultancies (or is I call them MSP/PSC) contracted out to clients on fixed term contracts will be included in the IR35 audit done so by clients. I can't make it any clearer.
For example BT has a permie staff member, BT pick up a role at a law firm doing software upgrades. They place said BT employee on site at the client for 35 hours a week, he is paid by BT. From the perspective of the internal direct employee IT staff of the law firm he is a contractor. Whether he is contracting through BT or his own limited company, there is no difference. So if they are not being included in IR35 then they should be. All I am saying.
Well if that's all you're saying then that's OK 'cos it's your opinion and you're entitled to it.
Thread closed."I can put any old tat in my sig, put quotes around it and attribute to someone of whom I've heard, to make it sound true."
- Voltaire/Benjamin Franklin/Anne Frank...Comment
Topic is closed
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Which IT contractor skills will be top five in 2025? Jan 2 09:08
- Secondary NI threshold sinking to £5,000: a limited company director’s explainer Dec 24 09:51
- Reeves sets Spring Statement 2025 for March 26th Dec 23 09:18
- Spot the hidden contractor Dec 20 10:43
- Accounting for Contractors Dec 19 15:30
- Chartered Accountants with MarchMutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants with March Mutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants Dec 19 15:05
- Unfairly barred from contracting? Petrofac just paid the price Dec 19 09:43
- An IR35 case law look back: contractor must-knows for 2025-26 Dec 18 09:30
Comment