Originally posted by Lance
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Draft Employment Status Manual Updates
Collapse
X
-
-
Originally posted by Lance View PostThat’s passive aggressive.
I apologise if I offended you by thanking people for sharing information. I didn't realise that giving thanks is now on the snowflake list.Comment
-
Comment
-
Originally posted by ladymuck View PostThanks!
ESM10015 is interesting, it is not clear how\if disagreements could be arbitrated if the client company fails to understand (or wilfully ignores) a correction\evidence for an alternative determination. The disagreement can also be brought at any point in the engagement, which could span more than one tax year and result in the incorrect taxes being paid back. Any such discussions would probably risk the relationships between PSC and Clients\Agents too. A cheeky PSC could well raise an Employment Tribunal and an IR35 disagreement at the end of a lengthy engagement, and use the evidence from both to fight each claim.
Reading it all, I'm starting to see why large users of contractors are starting to shut their doors - they just can't handle the complexity and risk. We'll have to see how the labour market responds I guess but the disruption in the meantime is going to be painful.Comment
-
Originally posted by IRMe View PostYou are welcome, you can have that in a friendly or an aggressive way of your choice.
ESM10015 is interesting, it is not clear how\if disagreements could be arbitrated if the client company fails to understand (or wilfully ignores) a correction\evidence for an alternative determination. The disagreement can also be brought at any point in the engagement, which could span more than one tax year and result in the incorrect taxes being paid back. Any such discussions would probably risk the relationships between PSC and Clients\Agents too. A cheeky PSC could well raise an Employment Tribunal and an IR35 disagreement at the end of a lengthy engagement, and use the evidence from both to fight each claim.
Reading it all, I'm starting to see why large users of contractors are starting to shut their doors - they just can't handle the complexity and risk. We'll have to see how the labour market responds I guess but the disruption in the meantime is going to be painful.When freedom comes along, don't PISH in the water supply.....Comment
-
Originally posted by TestMangler View PostThat's kinda half been done already, a number of years ago.......the guy generally gets ridiculed for it, but that's CUK for youComment
-
Originally posted by JohntheBike View Postat least the guy has been consistent in saying no employee taxes without employee benefits!When freedom comes along, don't PISH in the water supply.....Comment
-
Originally posted by TestMangler View PostFWIW I agreed with what you were doing at the time. Just a shame HMRC didn't try to take you for IR35 at the same time or just after. (A shame for us, not you :-) )
thanks for the words of support. Many others have also supported my position.Comment
-
Originally posted by JohntheBike View Postthey were going to, but were told (from high) to back off when I lost my ET. Which is why I keep claiming (even in today's posts) that HMRC are unlikely to challenge anyone who has an ET judgement about the engagement.
thanks for the words of support. Many others have also supported my position.'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!!Comment
-
Originally posted by northernladuk View PostMaking a claim thst something is unlikely 15+ years later... Yeah really helpful.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Why party conference season 2025 is a self-employment policy litmus test Today 09:53
- Labour decommissions Freelance Commissioner idea Yesterday 08:56
- Is it legal to work remotely from Europe via a UK company? Sep 5 22:44
- Is it legal to work remotely from Europe via a UK company? Sep 5 10:44
- Autumn Budget 2025 set for Nov 26, ‘putting contractors on watch’ Sep 4 15:13
- November 2025 Companies House ID rules contractors must follow Sep 3 19:12
- When agencies sink with your contractor invoice: a legal guide Sep 2 17:14
- Reeves ‘to raise VAT registration threshold to £100,000’ Sep 1 06:37
- When your agency shuts: a recruiter’s 5 tips if you’re unpaid Aug 29 06:57
- What the 2025 employment status review means for contractors Aug 28 06:39
Comment