Originally posted by RonBW
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Staying in the same public sector contract after April 2017
Collapse
X
Collapse
-
'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!! -
Originally posted by northernladuk View PostI'd say no. It's about the contract and working conditions. A middleman is largely irrelevant to the that. The partial win with JLJ contract was direct.Comment
-
Originally posted by pjt View Posteek, with this in mind do you think us who work direct may be less at risk from this retro tax grab?
My response is I am not sure if there is a requirement on the company you provide your services to, to report your NI details? If so then I assume similar if not then Eek statement on reporting may not affect you.
One ultimately for Eek to answer.Comment
-
Originally posted by pjt View PostLet me be clear here. My query is more around eeks comments on how HMRC will generate the list. He seems to be suggesting this will come from the agency reporting data combined with PS IR35 inside determinations. If direct I'm assuming their would be no agency reporting data therefore direct bods wouldn't be on the list.'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!!Comment
-
Originally posted by Semtex View PostI don't think your question has been answered as it seems to have strayed into IR35 legislation as opposed to the actual question of will being direct reduce the identification aspect pointed out by eek (i.e same agency reporting via NI numbers).
My response is I am not sure if there is a requirement on the company you provide your services to, to report your NI details? If so then I assume similar if not then Eek statement on reporting may not affect you.
One ultimately for Eek to answer.'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!!Comment
-
Originally posted by Semtex View PostMy response is I am not sure if there is a requirement on the company you provide your services to, to report your NI details? If so then I assume similar if not then Eek statement on reporting may not affect you.
One ultimately for Eek to answer.Comment
-
Originally posted by jamesbrown View PostThe intermediaries reporting requirement doesn't include PSCs working directly for an end client. It does provide a wealth of information and connections, so it could be used in targeting PSCs that supply through other intermediaries. Of course, it doesn't change anything about IR35 status, but that isn't the point (of a campaign designed to have uniformed PSCs concede or make mistakes early in the process). If you're reading this thread, you're already way ahead of the game. Your only, potentially fatal, mistake would be to stay in a contract that changes status in April without a change in WP that justified the change in status.'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!!Comment
-
Originally posted by northernladuk View PostWe need a closed thread sticky with this as the title at the top of each forum for awhile IMO.Comment
-
Originally posted by Semtex View PostOne ultimately for Eek to answer.First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win. But Gandhi never had to deal with HMRCComment
-
Originally posted by rob s View PostMeaning, presumably, that if you decided to stay, you'd want them to change the contract/agree a new title and SDC and MOO etc to, without question, put you 'inside ir35' to help defend your status up to the 5th?
People have to stop thinking minor manipulation of their situation will work to get around anything. It's about you in that seat. If you are still in it after the date you are done.'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!!Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Streamline Your Retirement with iSIPP: A Solution for Contractor Pensions Sep 1 09:13
- Making the most of pension lump sums: overview for contractors Sep 1 08:36
- Umbrella company tribunal cases are opening up; are your wages subject to unlawful deductions, too? Aug 31 08:38
- Contractors, relabelling 'labour' as 'services' to appear 'fully contracted out' won't dupe IR35 inspectors Aug 31 08:30
- How often does HMRC check tax returns? Aug 30 08:27
- Work-life balance as an IT contractor: 5 top tips from a tech recruiter Aug 30 08:20
- Autumn Statement 2023 tipped to prioritise mental health, in a boost for UK workplaces Aug 29 08:33
- Final reminder for contractors to respond to the umbrella consultation (closing today) Aug 29 08:09
- Top 5 most in demand cyber security contract roles Aug 25 08:38
- Changes to the right to request flexible working are incoming, but how will contractors be affected? Aug 24 08:25
Comment