• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

HMRC enquiries for EBT schemes through SANZAR

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    HMRC enquiries for EBT schemes through SANZAR

    Originally posted by LisaContractorUmbrella View Post
    Maybe but HMRC have to play by their own rules and if an assessment has already been raised and will therefore presumably be payable I think it wouldn't hurt to at least approach them about it
    My concern would be that hmrc will happily take it to tribunal after tribunal until they won for pure vendictiveness
    merely at clientco for the entertainment

    Comment


      Originally posted by eek View Post
      My concern would be that hmrc will happily take it to tribunal after tribunal until they won for pure vendictiveness
      If the tax debt was going to be settled what would be the point - my feeling is that this could only be used when the debt was acknowledged and paid. A settlement with HMRC doesn't just have to go one way. Whilst I agree that they can appear vindictive I think most of the court cases they instigate are designed to set a precedent - the tax debt itself might be small but if the outcome will establish a principal they'll go for it
      Connect with me on LinkedIn

      Follow us on Twitter.

      ContractorUK Best Forum Advisor 2015

      Comment


        Originally posted by malvolio View Post
        It's a tricky one, isn't it. There are arguments both ways.

        However, since you are trying to defend your position of being a regular taxpayer despite using a vehicle that Hector believes to be a sham tax avoidance one, pressing for additional tax relief on the grounds you weren't allowed to claim it from the sham company seems a little like waving a large red flag...
        I don't think any more red flags need to be waved. My accountant rekons you can claim them - as he pretty qualified I would tend to take his opinion.

        Comment


          This is what i found it from MD (Paul Mihailovi) of Sanzar in 2007.

          See message 22 from MD of Sanzar in 2007.

          http://forums.contractoruk.com/accou...company-3.html

          Comment


            So.. I decided to call them

            Appreciate your thoughts / comments on this.

            Called the settlement helpline.. Just to get a figure (funny how fast they answer the phone - see how long it rings out when you're after a rebate!). They said that the figure on the letter they sent me a while back stating what tax they thought was due was estimated.

            "in most Sanzar cases we have just seen amount claimed as earnings and multiplied it by 5 or 7 to tell you what we think you owe in tax." WTF, So, whats the point of submitting a P11D which shows what ammount have been taken in loans if they are not going to use that figure?

            Further more they requested copies of all bank statements to demonstrate earnings as they said P11D can not be trusted.

            So I said I'd like to purchase tax certs to halt interest. They said as it's estimated amount they cant give me a correct amount to buy on certs until I "close my challenge on the amount" which then means my tax is due.. Err no thanks.

            So i think I'm going to get the bank statements myself, calc the tax due, add the interest due and buy certs.

            EVEN MORE WORRYING - The person also said that buying certs DOES NOT hold the interest on the amoutn owed.. again, WTF. So there are clearly some training issues in that department, watch out. Quite how they can still charge me interest when they have the money is very much beyond me.

            Comment


              Originally posted by PC1976 View Post
              So i think I'm going to get the bank statements myself, calc the tax due, add the interest due and buy certs.

              EVEN MORE WORRYING - The person also said that buying certs DOES NOT hold the interest on the amoutn owed.. again, WTF. So there are clearly some training issues in that department, watch out. Quite how they can still charge me interest when they have the money is very much beyond me.
              Remember you only need to purchase a CTD to cover the tax, not the interest already accrued. This is because HMRC only charge simple interest, not compound.

              Eg.

              Tax (potentially) due on the loans is £50k. Interest accrued to date is £10k.

              You only need to take out a CTD for £50k to prevent any further interest.

              HMRC have confirmed that CTDs can be used to pay APNs should you ever receive them.

              Comment


                Thanks for that. Assuming I just purchase them online will it automatically be aligned against outstanding (potentially) owed tax? Sorry I am a bit useless in these matter hence where I am.

                They also said if I wanted to send them all of my statements from
                08 - current they would work out what tax I need to pay on other schemes. Thanks that's good of them. Also went to great lengths to explain they will take all to court and have good record of winning blah blah

                Cheers

                Comment


                  Originally posted by PC1976 View Post
                  Thanks for that. Assuming I just purchase them online will it automatically be aligned against outstanding (potentially) owed tax? Sorry I am a bit useless in these matter hence where I am.
                  I wasn't aware that you could purchase CTDs on-line.

                  They can be used to pay any tax bill. They are not tied to any particular liability.

                  Comment


                    Ok no probs. was my assumption and prob incorrect. Ta

                    Comment


                      So the interest is charged as your account is perceived to be in debt hence when you put money in there that stops future interest?

                      So I still don't think I quite understand how lets say if I owed 20k from 2008 the it's 20k + 5 years interest. How come I don't need CTDs to cover the potential amount overall. Thanks

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X