Originally posted by Christop
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
AM Limited COP8 HMRC Investigation Letter..
Collapse
X
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by Christop View PostOk, had a chat with a lady in AML and she gave me the following information
I am in a PBT scheme
We are not Dotas as we are self employed so should not be under the immediate spotlight
If the new bill passes I guess they will get around to us but who knows when, not quite sure how to take this within the bigger picture.Blog? What blog...?Comment
-
Originally posted by malvolio View PostOne really has to admire an optimist...Comment
-
Originally posted by ChristopSo, in theory if you earn 108k a year before tax and received 78k in loans and a further 10k in wages which was taxed, the taxable excess would be on the loans?
What accounts for the 20k difference between the 108 and the 78+10? That wasn't all fees was it?Comment
-
varunksinghvarunksingh
- Thanks (Given):
- 0
- Thanks (Received):
- 0
- Likes (Given):
- 0
- Likes (Received):
- 0
Originally posted by Christop View PostOk, had a chat with a lady in AML and she gave me the following information
I am in a PBT scheme
We are not Dotas as we are self employed so should not be under the immediate spotlight
If the new bill passes I guess they will get around to us but who knows when, not quite sure how to take this within the bigger picture.Comment
-
Originally posted by Christop View PostI think I need to be at the moment, not saying they won't chase me but that I may not be the first in line, this would at least give me time to liquidise assets and prepare for the worstBlog? What blog...?Comment
-
Originally posted by malvolio View PostVery true; it would be foolish to think they aren't going to bite at some point. Being SE will not help of itself, ,especially if they start hanging unrelated cases together on the back of one win. HMRC are taking a very simplistic view of the situation.
https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/the_boyle_caseComment
-
So, what happens now? Do we just sit and wait for the demands to arrive? I have emailed AML but not had any response yet.....Comment
-
Originally posted by ads1980 View PostSo, what happens now? Do we just sit and wait for the demands to arrive? I have emailed AML but not had any response yet.....Comment
-
AML budget update
I'm also very concerned about the proposed HRMC new powers. I received this update from AML today
------------
AML Budget Update
In last week’s Budget, HMRC announced that they intend, in certain cases, to try and press ahead with the introduction of new rules that allow them to issue demands for payments on account of disputed tax liabilities. The Accelerated Payment rules have been heavily criticized by all the leading tax, legal and accountancy bodies.
In particular, the proposals would allow HMRC to issue payment notices to individuals who have an open assessment in relation to a DOTAS registered arrangement. This could affect individuals who were employed by AML up until 5 April 2011.
Our view, supported by leading Tax Counsel, is that the proposals are illegal under UK and EU Law and are simply contrary to public policy in that they give unchecked powers to HMRC.
At this stage we do not know if HMRC would use these powers to make any tax demands from former AML employees. However, AML fully intends to challenge the proposals once the Finance Bill is published. There are over 70,000 people affected by these proposals and there is strong industry belief that these proposals breach EU law and they will be withdrawn.
If they are not withdrawn AML intends to challenge any notices issued under the new rules and has instructed lawyers to prepare a case for Judicial Review.
As always AML stands behind its planning and will take every step necessary to ensure it is successfully defended from challenge by HMRC. Once the detailed legislation is published, we will contact you again with further updates.
You should note that AML PCC, which has been in place since April 2011, is unaffected by the new proposals and complies with the latest Onshore and Offshore Intermediaries rules.
---------
It's good to know that AML are taking this seriously and will hopefully out up a fight on behalf of AML users.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Streamline Your Retirement with iSIPP: A Solution for Contractor Pensions Sep 1 09:13
- Making the most of pension lump sums: overview for contractors Sep 1 08:36
- Umbrella company tribunal cases are opening up; are your wages subject to unlawful deductions, too? Aug 31 08:38
- Contractors, relabelling 'labour' as 'services' to appear 'fully contracted out' won't dupe IR35 inspectors Aug 31 08:30
- How often does HMRC check tax returns? Aug 30 08:27
- Work-life balance as an IT contractor: 5 top tips from a tech recruiter Aug 30 08:20
- Autumn Statement 2023 tipped to prioritise mental health, in a boost for UK workplaces Aug 29 08:33
- Final reminder for contractors to respond to the umbrella consultation (closing today) Aug 29 08:09
- Top 5 most in demand cyber security contract roles Aug 25 08:38
- Changes to the right to request flexible working are incoming, but how will contractors be affected? Aug 24 08:25
Comment