Another Consulting Overseas Victim?

[moggy]

Paul Courtney Bishopp did seem to favour the name Sandfield didn't he? Did anyone unearth any detail as to why?

Could it have been the name of the school that he attended, the name of the street that he lived on or perhaps the name of one of his holiday homes?

hmmm

[NickNick]

Paul Courtney Bishopp did seem to favour the name Sandfield didn't he? Did anyone unearth any detail as to why?

Could it have been the name of the school that he attended, the name of the street that he lived on or perhaps the name of one of his holiday homes?

Only 2 of the 40 odd companies that he's been a director of have that name.
Sandfield Systems and Sandfield Consulting.
PAUL COURTNEY BISHOPP director information. Free director information.

[wePaid4PortcullisHouse]

SANDFIELD

Are you ruling out the possibility that he came up with the Sandfield Consultants name then? Just a massive co-incidence?

[moggy]

Are you ruling out the possibility that he came up with the Sandfield Consultants name then? Just a massive co-incidence?

seems like you're the one looking to make assumptions or lead people to certain conclusions.

Which is it?

[wePaid4PortcullisHouse]

Crikey I feel like I am being interviewed by the Special Patrol Group.

Just an innocent question.

[cojak]

Crikey I feel like I am being interviewed by the Special Patrol Group.

Just an innocent question.

Riiigggghhhttttt....

[wePaid4PortcullisHouse]

Ha ha.

Ok, I'll be honest. I do think that Paul Courtney Bishop came up with that name.

[Ruskin]

Any further information out there?

Hi all,

Following the Boyle vs. HMRC fiasco ruling it seems like the options are running out. I, for one, am now looking at damage limitation. This is not a nice exercise with a 50k+ tax bill waiting around the corner.

I wonder if anyone has any more info with regards to 2 questions:

1) Mr. Boyle lost if the first tier tribunal. Is/can he appeal the decision and go to a second tier tribunal?

2) Is anyone aware of any action being taken against the directors of Consulting Overseas / Sandfield?

All the best

[LisaContractorUmbrella]

Hi all,

Following the Boyle vs. HMRC fiasco ruling it seems like the options are running out. I, for one, am now looking at damage limitation. This is not a nice exercise with a 50k+ tax bill waiting around the corner.

I wonder if anyone has any more info with regards to 2 questions:

1) Mr. Boyle lost if the first tier tribunal. Is/can he appeal the decision and go to a second tier tribunal?

2) Is anyone aware of any action being taken against the directors of Consulting Overseas / Sandfield?

All the best

The FTT stated that, even if they were wrong to state that the loans were emoluments of his employment, Mr Boyle should be liable to tax under the transfer of assets provisions so there would not be any further grounds for appeal

[z4thras]

The FTT stated that, even if they were wrong to state that the loans were emoluments of his employment, Mr Boyle should be liable to tax under the transfer of assets provisions so there would not be any further grounds for appeal

And should the HMRC v Murray Group appeal be dismissed, wasn't it HMRC who agreed in this EBT case that loans were not emoluments, which could be in direct conflict of the Boyle Case.