The Hoey appeal has been listed on 28 March 2022, for 5 days.
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Hoey appeal listed
Collapse
X
-
-
I've dipped in to day 4 of the appeal (Hoey (claimant/appellant) & ors v Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs (defendant/respondent) - YouTube).
Am I right to feel that HMRC are getting a bit of a grilling and are fluffing it a bit?
About 2:45 into the stream there are some references to the "End User" and what responsibility they have for using TP services which may have challenging (challengeable) tax setups - One of these "End Users" I worked for was HMRC! One of the reasons I thought I was on safe ground with MTM/ Montpelier...
Anyone else work at HMRC or other Govt Depts? Does this matter?
-
I've been enjoying the Armadillo tweets even though I don't understand 99% of what's going on -
https://twitter.com/ArmadilloSupprt/...37561683431432Comment
-
Seems like the judges want to side with HMRC on the PAYE issue who say they have a discretion apparently allowed in a manual that no-one is allowed to see that contradicts what is in the public manual. Essentially the judges want to find in favour of HMRC because they don't like tax avoidance rather than based on the actual law.Comment
-
See the Costello case and the massive extension to what the definition of an MSC is...Originally posted by dammit chloe View PostSeems like the judges want to side with HMRC on the PAYE issue who say they have a discretion apparently allowed in a manual that no-one is allowed to see that contradicts what is in the public manual. Essentially the judges want to find in favour of HMRC because they don't like tax avoidance rather than based on the actual law.merely at clientco for the entertainmentComment
-
A crown court judge siding with the crown prosecutors? Whatever next eh?!Originally posted by dammit chloe View PostSeems like the judges want to side with HMRC on the PAYE issue who say they have a discretion apparently allowed in a manual that no-one is allowed to see that contradicts what is in the public manual. Essentially the judges want to find in favour of HMRC because they don't like tax avoidance rather than based on the actual law.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- How IR35 inflated an £8.5bn consultancy bill — and tests Burnham at the Budget Aug 28 07:47
- Autumn Budget 2026: FCSA’s 5 contractor asks of John Healey Aug 27 04:15
- Andy Burnham's Zoom gripe doesn’t apply to IT contractors, say recruiters Aug 26 03:41
- Check your Loan Recall paperwork for the Isle of Man: it could matter Aug 25 03:27
- Budget 2026: Contractor advisers ask for ‘IR35 reset’ Aug 24 04:57
- Why might an umbrella company fail to pay its total tax bill to HMRC? Aug 18 06:08
- Contractors, here are the late payment fixes that the Lords just turned down Aug 17 08:03
- How will HMRC's Direct Debit plan affect contractors paying VAT and PAYE? Aug 13 23:54
- HMRC's new 'reckless' tax offence: an IR35 game-changer for contractors? Aug 13 13:50
- “I’m not a Machiavellian overlord”: Adrian Sacco breaks his silence on the Contractor Loan Recalls Aug 13 06:50

Comment